全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Density Dependence of the Macroscale Superelastic Behavior of Porous Shape Memory Alloys: A Two-Dimensional Approach

DOI: 10.1155/2013/749296

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Porous Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs) are of particular interest for many industrial applications, as they combine intrinsic SMA (shape memory effect and superelasticity) and foam characteristics. The computational cost of direct porous material modeling is however extremely high, and so designing porous SMA structure poses a considerable challenge. In this study, an attempt is made to simulate the superelastic behavior of porous materials via the modeling of fully dense structures with material properties modified using a porous/bulk density ratio scaling relation. Using this approach, direct modeling of the porous microstructure is avoided, and only the macroscale response of the model is considered which contributes to a drastic reduction of the computational cost. Foam structures with a gradient of porosity are also studied, and the prediction made using the fully dense material model is shown to be in agreement with the mesoscale porous material model. 1. Introduction Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs) exhibit unusual mechanical properties such as shape memory and superelasticity, which make them very attractive for a wide range of industrial applications, from aerospace to medicine [1, 2]. For more than a decade, not only fully dense but also porous or foamed forms of SMA have been studied because of their additional benefits: low density, high permeability, and energy dissipation properties [3]. The level of foam porosity is selected as a function of the final use of a material while structural applications of porous SMA require low-to-medium porosity foams (pore volume fraction (PVF) ≤ 40%); biomedical applications, such as bone implants [4], need highly porous material with PVF of up to 70%. The properties of porous SMAs are strongly dependent on their porous microstructure, whose length scale is much smaller than that associated with the macroscale response of the whole material. From a numerical point of view, modeling this micro/macro behavior has a tremendous numerical cost. To alleviate the complexity of the micro/macroapproach, that is, the explicit representation of the porous microstructure, researchers have chosen different routes, such as micromechanical averaging techniques [6, 7] or Unit Cell approach [8, 9]. However, those strategies are based on assumptions (low porosity, regular pore distribution, spherically shaped pores, etc.) that are not fully compatible with the biomedical application foams [5] that we are studying in the present paper. To overcome the micro/macro numerical cost while reconciling the needs of biomedical foams, we have

References

[1]  D. Lagoudas, Shape Memory Alloys: Modeling and Engineering Applications, Springer, 2008.
[2]  V. Brailovski, S. Prokoshkin, P. Terriault, and F. Trochu, Shape Memory Alloys: Fundamentals, Modeling and Applications, école de Technologie Supérieure, 2003.
[3]  Y. Zhao, M. Taya, and H. Izui, “Study on energy absorbing composite structure made of concentric NiTi spring and porous NiTi,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 2497–2512, 2006.
[4]  O. Prymak, D. Bogdanski, M. K?ller et al., “Morphological characterization and in vitro biocompatibility of a porous nickel-titanium alloy,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 29, pp. 5801–5807, 2005.
[5]  V. Brailovski, S. Prokoshkin, M. Gauthier et al., “Bulk and porous metastable beta Ti-Nb-Zr(Ta) alloys for biomedical applications,” Materials Science and Engineering C, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 643–657, 2011.
[6]  P. B. Entchev and D. C. Lagoudas, “Modeling porous shape memory alloys using micromechanical averaging techniques,” Mechanics of Materials, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2002.
[7]  S. Nemat-Nasser, Y. Su, W.-G. Guo, and J. Isaacs, “Experimental characterization and micromechanical modeling of superelastic response of a porous NiTi shape-memory alloy,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 2320–2346, 2005.
[8]  S. Nemat-Nasser and M. Hori, Micromechanics: Overall Properties of Heterogeneous Materials, vol. 2, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999.
[9]  M. A. Qidwai, P. B. Entchev, D. C. Lagoudas, and V. G. DeGiorgi, “Modeling of the thermomechanical behavior of porous shape memory alloys,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 38, no. 48-49, pp. 8653–8671, 2001.
[10]  L. Gibson and M. Ashby, Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[11]  I. Ansys, Ansys Mechanical APDL and Mechanical Applications Theory Reference, Ansys, Inc., 13th edition, 2010.
[12]  F. Auricchio, R. L. Taylor, and J. Lubliner, “Shape-memory alloys: macromodelling and numerical simulations of the superelastic behavior,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 146, no. 3-4, pp. 281–312, 1997.
[13]  D. C. Lagoudas and P. B. Entchev, “Modeling of transformation-induced plasticity and its effect on the behavior of porous shape memory alloys—part I: constitutive model for fully dense SMAs,” Mechanics of Materials, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 865–892, 2004.
[14]  M. Panico and L. C. Brinson, “A three-dimensional phenomenological model for martensite reorientation in shape memory alloys,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 2491–2511, 2007.
[15]  F. Auricchio, A. Reali, and U. Stefanelli, “A three-dimensional model describing stress-induced solid phase transformation with permanent inelasticity,” International Journal of Plasticity, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 207–226, 2007.
[16]  T. Kanit, S. Forest, I. Galliet, V. Mounoury, and D. Jeulin, “Determination of the size of the representative volume element for random composites: statistical and numerical approach,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 40, no. 13-14, pp. 3647–3679, 2003.
[17]  I. M. Gitman, H. Askes, and L. J. Sluys, “Representative volume: existence and size determination,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 74, no. 16, pp. 2518–2534, 2007.
[18]  H. Shen and L. Brinson, “A numerical investigation of the effect of boundary conditions and representative volume element size for porous titanium,” Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, vol. 1, pp. 1179–1204, 2006.
[19]  A. P. Roberts and E. J. Garboczi, “Elastic properties of model random three-dimensional open-cell solids,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 33–55, 2002.
[20]  X. Wang, Y. Li, J. Xiong, and C. Wen, “Porous TiNbZr alloy scaffolds for biomedical applications,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 3616–3624, 2009.
[21]  V. G. DeGiorgi and M. A. Qidwai, “A computational mesoscale evaluation of material characteristics of porous shape memory alloys,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 435–443, 2002.
[22]  M. Panico and L. C. Brinson, “Computational modeling of porous shape memory alloys,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 45, no. 21, pp. 5613–5626, 2008.
[23]  W. Pompe, H. Worch, M. Epple et al., “Functionally graded materials for biomedical applications,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 362, no. 1-2, pp. 40–60, 2003.
[24]  H. Shen and L. C. Brinson, “Finite element modeling of porous titanium,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 320–335, 2007.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133