全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Volkman’s Contracture, Persistent Limb Ischaemia, and Amputation: A Complication of Brachial Artery Catheterisation for Haemodynamic Monitoring Using PiCCO

DOI: 10.1155/2013/474358

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

We report a case of a 64-year-old woman who was admitted to intensive care unit with multiorgan failure secondary to Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Haemodynamic monitoring using the transpulmonary thermodilution with pulse contour analysis system (PiCCO) was achieved via the left brachial artery. Two days later, a flexion deformity of the left hand was noted, and examination revealed left lower arm ischaemia. Removal of the catheter resulted in an immediate improvement of the contracture. However, distal pulses were still absent, and the arm remained ischaemic resulting in a below elbow amputation. This is the first documented case of a persistent limb ischaemia following the insertion of an arterial catheter for haemodynamic monitoring with PiCCO. We therefore highlight the need for regular assessment of limb perfusion after arterial catheterisation for haemodynamic monitoring with PiCCO. In addition, the brachial artery should be avoided, and femoral artery catheterisation is recommended. 1. Introduction Advanced haemodynamic monitoring is used extensively in intensive care to help assist with cardiovascular management of critically ill patients. Traditionally, advanced haemodynamic management involved the use of pulmonary artery catheters (PAC); however, this method is becoming less popular as the benefits of using this technique remain controversial [1, 2]. In addition, its use has been associated with complications such as arrhythmias, infection, thrombotic complications [3], and, rarely, rupture of the pulmonary artery [4, 5]. Transpulmonary thermodilution monitoring using the PiCCO system (PULSION Medical System, Munich, Germany) is being used as a popular alternative to PAC. It’s claimed benefits include minimal side effects, less invasiveness and is well validated against PAC. Data on the complications associated with this monitoring technique is limited; however, a recent prospective study which included over 500 patients in 14 different European intensive care units has shown that haemodynamic monitoring with PiCCO is safe, and serious complications are rare [6]. 2. Case Report A 64-year-old lady with recent history of traveling to Uganda was admitted to the hospital with Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Her comorbidities included hypertension and morbid obesity. The initial parasite count was 14%. Soon after her admission, her clinical condition deteriorated, and she developed multiple organ failure requiring ventilatory, renal supports, and advanced haemodynamic management. To help assist with cardiovascular and circulatory management,

References

[1]  R. S. Wiener and H. G. Welch, “Trends in the use of the pulmonary artery catheter in the United States, 1993–2004,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 298, no. 4, pp. 423–429, 2007.
[2]  G. A. Ospina-Tascón, R. L. Cordioli, and J.-L. Vincent, “What type of monitoring has been shown to improve outcomes in acutely ill patients?” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 800–820, 2008.
[3]  M. Hadian and M. R. Pinsky, “Evidence-based review of the use of the pulmonary artery catheter: impact data and complications,” Critical Care, vol. 10, no. 3, supplement, article S8, 2006.
[4]  T. F. Kelly Jr., G. C. Morris Jr., and E. S. Crawford, “Perforation of the pulmonary artery with Swan-Ganz catheters. Diagnosis and surgical management,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 193, no. 6, pp. 686–692, 1981.
[5]  G. Della Rocca and M. G. Costa, “Hemodynamic-volumetric monitoring,” Minerva Anestesiologica, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 229–232, 2004.
[6]  F. J. Belda, G. Aguilar, J. L. Teboul et al., “Complications related to less-invasive haemodynamic monitoring,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 482–486, 2011.
[7]  B. V. Scheer, A. Perel, and U. J. Pfeiffer, “Clinical review: complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine,” Critical Care, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 198–204, 2002.
[8]  T. R. Cousins and J. M. O'Donnell, “Arterial cannulation: a critical review,” American Association of Nurse Anesthetists Journal, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 267–271, 2004.
[9]  T. T. Horlocker and A. T. Bishop, “Compartment syndrome of the forearm and hand after brachial artery cannulation,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 1092–1094, 1995.
[10]  F. Thomas, J. P. Burke, and J. Parker, “The risk of infection related to radial vs femoral sites for arterial catheterizatin,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 807–812, 1983.
[11]  E. E. Frezza and H. Mezghebe, “Indications and complications of arterial catheter use in surgical or medical intensive care units: analysis of 4932 patients,” American Surgeon, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 127–131, 1998.
[12]  O. Traoré, J. Liotier, and B. Souweine, “Prospective study of arterial and central venous catheter colonization and of arterial- and central venous catheter-related bacteremia in intensive care units,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1276–1280, 2005.
[13]  K. Ghosh and S. Shetty, “Blood coagulation in falciparum malaria—a review,” Parasitology Research, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 571–576, 2008.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133