全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A Case of False Negative NIPT for Down Syndrome-Lessons Learned

DOI: 10.1155/2014/823504

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Down syndrome or trisomy 21 is the most common cause of prenatal chromosome abnormalities with approximately 50% of all reported chromosome conditions. With the successful introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down syndrome into routine prenatal care, it is important to understand the risks, benefits, and limitations in order to guide patients in making an informed decision. Herein, we describe the first published case report of a patient whose fetus tested “negative” for Trisomy 21 by NIPT but was diagnosed postnatally with trisomy 21. We present the importance of proper pretest and posttest genetic counseling to ensure prenatal patients are able to make informed decisions and are educated appropriately about NIPT. 1. Introduction It has been a little over two years since noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was introduced as part of prenatal care to screen high-risk patients for fetal aneuploidy in the United States. Since then, the clinical use of NIPT has become increasingly common as it provides women with a more sensitive noninvasive screening option with detection rates reported as high as 99% for Down syndrome (DS) or Trisomy 21 [1]. Other clinical noninvasive screening modalities for DS include the first trimester screen with a detection rate of 75–80% and the maternal serum screen which has a detection rate of 80% [1]. NIPT evaluates cell-free DNA (cfDNA) that circulates in maternal blood and can be done as early as 9-week gestation [2]. While NIPT has shown to be both highly sensitive and highly specific across numerous studies [1, 3–11], the only diagnostic tests offered prenatally for DS or other aneuploidies are amniocentesis and chorionic villus (CVS) sampling. Several professional organizations, including the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG), the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC), have released position statements to help guide prenatal practices on the indications for use of NIPT [12, 13]. The overarching agreement among these organizations indicates that NIPT should only be offered to high-risk women as defined by (1) maternal age 35 years or older at delivery, (2) fetal ultrasound findings indicative of possible aneuploidy, (3) previous history of prior pregnancy with trisomy, (4) known familial robertsonian translocation, or a (5) previous positive prenatal screen [12, 13]. They also recommend NIPT testing only be given in context with pretest and posttest genetic counseling [12, 13]. Further, the American College of Medical Genetics

References

[1]  D. W. Bianchi, L. D. Platt, J. D. Goldberg, A. Z. Abuhamad, A. J. Sehnert, and R. P. Rava, “Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 890–901, 2012.
[2]  B. Zimmermann, M. Hill, G. Gemelos, et al., “Noninvasive prenatal aneuploidy testing of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y, using targeted sequencing of polymorphic loci,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 32, no. 13, pp. 1233–1241, 2012.
[3]  T. K. Lau, F. Jiang, M. K. Chan, et al., “Non-invasive prenatal screening of fetal Down syndrome by maternal plasma DNA sequencing in twin pregnancies,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 434–437, 2013.
[4]  G. Ashoor, A. Syngelaki, M. Wagner, C. Birdir, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Chromosome-selective sequencing of maternal plasma cell-free DNA for first-trimester detection of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 206, no. 4, pp. 322.e1–322.e5, 2012.
[5]  S. Dan, W. Wang, J. Ren, et al., “Clinical application of massively parallel sequencing-based prenatal noninvasive fetal trisomy test for trisomies 21 and 18 in 11,105 pregnancies with mixed risk factors,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 32, no. 13, pp. 1225–1232, 2012.
[6]  K. H. Nicolaides, A. Syngelaki, G. Ashoor, C. Birdir, and G. Touzet, “Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies in a routinely screened first-trimester population,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 207, no. 5, pp. 374.e1–374.e6, 2012.
[7]  M. E. Norton, H. Brar, J. Weiss, et al., “Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) study: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 207, no. 2, pp. 137.e1–137.e8, 2012.
[8]  G. E. Palomaki, E. M. Kloza, G. M. Lambert-Messerlian et al., “DNA sequencing of maternal plasma to detect Down syndrome: an international clinical validation study,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 913–920, 2011.
[9]  A. B. Sparks, C. A. Struble, E. T. Wang, K. Song, and A. Oliphant, “Noninvasive prenatal detection and selective analysis of cell-free DNA obtained from maternal blood: evaluation for trisomy 21 and trisomy 18,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 206, no. 4, pp. 319.e1–319.e9, 2012.
[10]  A. B. Sparks, E. T. Wang, C. A. Struble et al., “Selective analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood for evaluation of fetal trisomy,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 3–9, 2012.
[11]  M. Smith and J. Visootsak, “Noninvasive screening tools for Down syndrome: a review,” International Journal of Women's Health, vol. 5, pp. 125–131, 2013.
[12]  American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics, “Committee opinion no. 545: noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 1532–1534, 2012.
[13]  P. L. Devers, A. Cronister, K. E. Ormond, et al., “Noninvasive prenatal testing/noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: the position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors,” Journal of Genetic Counseling, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 291–295, 2013.
[14]  A. R. Gregg, S. J. Gross, R. G. Best, et al., “ACMG statement on noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 395–398, 2013.
[15]  T. Futch, J. Spinosa, S. Bhatt, et al., “Initial clinical laboratory experience in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy from maternal plasma DNA samples,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 569–574, 2013.
[16]  K. H. Nicolaides, A. Syngelaki, M. Gil, V. Atanasova, and D. Markova, “Validation of targeted sequencing of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for non-invasive prenatal detection of aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 575–579, 2013.
[17]  M. Ehrich, C. Deciu, T. Zwiefelhofer et al., “Noninvasive detection of fetal trisomy 21 by sequencing of DNA in maternal blood: a study in a clinical setting,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 205.e1–205.e11, 2011.
[18]  M. Savage, “Merging into clinical practice: updates in non-invasive prenatal testing,” in Proceedings of the 31st NSGC Annual Education Conference, Boston, Mass, USA, 2012.
[19]  R. W. K. Chiu, K. C. A. Chan, Y. Gao et al., “Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy by massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA in maternal plasma,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 51, pp. 20458–20463, 2008.
[20]  Verinata Health, “Analytical Validation of the Verifi Prenatal Test: Enhanced Test Performance for Detecting Trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and the Option for Classification of Sex Chromosome Status,” Redwood City, Calif, USA, 2012.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133