全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Fetoplacental Discrepancy with Normal Karyotype in Amniotic Fluid and Two Different Cell Lines in Placenta

DOI: 10.1155/2013/951710

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

We present a case of fetoplacental discrepancy in a second-trimester fetus with normal karyotype in amniotic fluid and two different Robertsonian translocations in placenta. A 41-year-old woman of Middle-Eastern origin, gravida 2, para 1, underwent amniocentesis at 16-week gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniotic fluid karyotype showed a normal 46,XX karyotype with a homozygous inv(9). Parental chromosome analysis showed both parents to be carriers of inv(9) and the parents are not consanguineous. Fetal ultrasound was normal. The mother presented to the clinic 4 weeks later with intrauterine fetal demise. Chromosome analysis from the placenta showed two different cell lines: a balanced (15;21) Roberstonian translocation in 11 cells and an unbalanced (21;21) Robertsonian translocation in 9 cells. The karyotype was interpreted as mos 45,XX,inv(9)(p11q13)x2,der(15;21)(q10;q10)[11]/46,XX,inv(9)(p11q13)x2,+21,der(21;21)(q10;q10). Mother was a carrier for the Cystic Fibrosis (delta F508), Factor V Leiden mutations, HbD-Los Angeles and HbQ-India variants. She also had a sibling with term stillbirth. Her husband’s history was unremarkable. Our case appears to be another example of confined placental mosaicism (CPM) with normal fetal karyotype. However, we could not confirm the possibility that CPM contributed to the IUFD in our case given the complex medical history of the mother. 1. Introduction Intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) is a major problem in obstetrics. The overall IUFD rates have been estimated to be approximately 1% [1]. In pregnancy, a successful outcome is highly dependent on adequate placental development with low-resistance fetomaternal circulation [2]. Abnormal placentation in pregnancy could be due to several factors including confined placental mosaicism (CPM) and increased maternal tendency to venous thrombosis. Karyotype disparities between cytotrophoblast and fetal cells occur in 1-2% of cases [3]. In most of them, chromosomal abnormalities are confined to the placenta and may be associated with a poor perinatal outcome [4, 5]. Most such chromosome abnormalities involve aneuploidies, and autosomal trisomy being most common with structural mosaicism is rare and often difficult to interpret [6]. The phenomenon of “confined placental mosaicism (CPM)” is defined as tissue-specific mosaicism involving a cytogenetic abnormality limited to the placenta and absent in the fetus arising from an early mitotic error [7, 8]. Three types of CPM have been described. First, trisomic cytotrophoblast and diploid stroma; second, diploid

References

[1]  R. Ferguson and S. A. Myers, “Population study of the risk of fetal death and its relationship to birthweight, gestational age, and race,” American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 267–272, 1994.
[2]  D. S. Dizon-Townson, L. Meline, L. M. Nelson, M. Varner, and K. Ward, “Fetal carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation are prone to miscarriage and placental infarction,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 402–405, 1997.
[3]  D. H. Ledbetter, J. M. Zachary, J. L. Simpson et al., “Cytogenetic results from the U.S. collaborative study on CVS,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 317–345, 1992.
[4]  A. S. P. M. Breed, A. Mantingh, R. Vosters, J. R. Beekhuis, J. M. M. Van Lith, and G. J. P. A. Anders, “Follow-up and pregnancy outcome after a diagnosis of mosaicism in CVS,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 577–580, 1991.
[5]  D. K. Kalousek, P. N. Howard-Peebles, S. B. Olson et al., “Confirmation of CVS mosaicism in term placentae and high frequency of intrauterine growth retardation association with confined placental mosaicism,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 743–750, 1991.
[6]  J. M. Hahnemann and L. O. Vejerslev, “Accuracy of cytogenetic findings on chorionic villus sampling (CVS)—diagnostic consequences of CVS mosaicism and non-mosaic discrepancy in centres contributing to EUCROMIC 1986–1992,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 801–820, 1997.
[7]  D. K. Kalousek and M. Vekemans, “Confined placental mosaicism,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 529–533, 1996.
[8]  I. Filges, A. Kang, V. Klug et al., “aCGH on chorionic villi mirrors the complexity of fetoplacental mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 473–478, 2011.
[9]  D. K. Kalousek, I. J. Barrett, and B. C. McGillivray, “Placental mosaicism and intrauterine survival of trisomies 13 and 18,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 338–343, 1989.
[10]  D. K. Kalousek, S. Langlois, I. Barrett et al., “Uniparental disomy for chromosome 16 in humans,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 8–16, 1993.
[11]  C. Farra, B. Guidicelli, M. C. Pellissier, N. Philip, and C. Piquet, “Fetoplacental chromosomal discrepancy,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 20, pp. 190–193, 2000.
[12]  R. M. Bertina, B. P. C. Koeleman, T. Koster et al., “Mutation in blood coagulation factor V associated with resistance to activated protein C,” Nature, vol. 369, no. 6475, pp. 64–67, 1994.
[13]  S. R. Poort, F. R. Rosendaal, P. H. Reitsma, and R. M. Bertina, “A common genetic variation in the 3'-untranslated region of the prothrombin gene is associated with elevated plasma prothrombin levels and an increase in venous thrombosis,” Blood, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 3698–3703, 1996.
[14]  L. G. Shaffer, M. L. Slovak, and L. J. Campbell, Eds., ISCN 2009. An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature, S. Karger, Basel, Switzerland, 2009.
[15]  W. S. Long, M. T. Mennuti, B. S. Emanuel, and E. H. Zackai, “Prenatal diagnosis of mosaicism 46,XX/46,XX,-21,+t(21q21q),” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 73–77, 1984.
[16]  G. Lissalde-Lavigne, P. Fabbro-Peray, E. Cochery-Nouvellon et al., “Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A polymorphisms as risk factors for miscarriage during a first intended pregnancy: the matched case-control “NOHA first” study,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 2178–2184, 2005.
[17]  E. Grandone, M. Margaglione, D. Colaizzo et al., “Factor V Leiden is associated with repeated and recurrent unexplained fetal losses,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 822–824, 1997.
[18]  B. Brenner, G. Sarig, Z. Weiner, J. Younis, Z. Blumenfeld, and N. Lanir, “Thrombophilic polymorphisms are common in women with fetal loss without apparent cause,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 6–9, 1999.
[19]  G. Sarig, J. S. Younis, R. Hoffman, N. Lanir, Z. Blumenfeld, and B. Brenner, “Thrombophilia is common in women with idiopathic pregnancy loss and is associated with late pregnancy wastage,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 342–347, 2002.
[20]  D. Warburton and B. Strobino, “Recurrent spontaneous abortion,” in Spontaneous and Recurrent Abortion, M. J. Bennet and D. K. Edmonds, Eds., pp. 77–89, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK, 1987.

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133