全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Interhypothalamic Adhesion in a 9-Month-Old Male with Cleft Palate

DOI: 10.1155/2013/197415

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

A 9-month-old male infant with multiple congenital anomalies including cleft lip and palate was referred to us for a brain MR to exclude additional intracranial abnormalities. Imaging revealed an interhypothalamic adhesion, which we present as a possible forme fruste of holoprosencephaly. 1. Introduction Holoprosencephaly (HPE) represents a spectrum of disorders in which the prosencephalon, to varying degrees, fails to cleave into bilateral structures during embryologic development [1–4]. Though considered a disorder of telencephalic cleavage, it can also involve the diencephalon, which forms the thalamus and epithalamus [4]. The hypothalamus, now considered a derivative of the secondary prosencephalon, has been shown to be universally unionized in holoprosencephaly even in the mildest of forms [5]. HPE has been divided into three main types along its spectrum, in decreasing severity, as alobar, semilobar, and lobar. Other variants include syntelencephaly, solitary median maxillary central incisor syndrome, and congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis [1]. With the exception of syntelencephaly, the mildest forms of holoprosencephaly show only partial forebrain and diencephalic union. We present a case of a 9-month-old male status after cleft palate repair, referred to us to evaluate additional intracranial congenital anomalies. Brain MR revealed an interhypothalamic adhesion in addition to falx cerebri hypoplasia, hip- pocampal malrotation, and equivocal optic tract hypoplasia. 2. Case A 9-month-old male infant with multiple congenital anomalies, including a history of repaired unilateral complete cleft palate and lip, released club foot, and bilateral undescended testes, presented to our imaging service to exclude additional intracranial congenital abnormalities. The patient had previously undergone an extensive diagnostic workup that revealed a normal male genetic karyotype. As of this case writeup, the workup had not rendered a specific unifying diagnosis. A brain MRI was requested to search for congenital intracranial structural midline abnormalities. The examination was performed on a 1.5T MR (Signa HDxt Optima edition, General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Prescribed pulse sequences included sagittal T1WI fast spoiled gradient echo Brain Volume imaging (FSPGR BRAVO), axial T1 fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR), axial T2WI, axial T2 fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR), and coronal short tau inversion recovery (STIR). In addition, thin section coronal and axial T1WI FSPGR and coronal fast imaging employing steady-state

References

[1]  A. G. Osborn, Osborn’s Brain: Imaging, Pathology, and Anatomy, Wolters Kluwer-Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2012.
[2]  K. Swaiman, S. Ashwal, D. M. Ferriero, and D. Ferriero, Swaiman's Pediatric Neurology: Principles and Practice, Elsevier Saunders, 5th edition, 2012.
[3]  P. Tortori-Donati, A. Rossi, and R. Biancheri, “Brain malformations,” in Pediatric Neuroradiology: Brain, Head, Neck and Spine, P. Tortori-Donati and A. Rossi, Eds., pp. 86–94, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1st edition, 2009.
[4]  M. Dias and M. Partington, “Normal and abnormal embryology of the brain,” in Youmans Neurological Surgery, H. Winn, Ed., pp. 1883–1897, Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 6th edition, 2011.
[5]  E. M. Simon, R. Hevner, J. D. Pinter et al., “Assessment of the deep gray nuclei in holoprosencephaly,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1955–1961, 2000.
[6]  N. Sato, S. Hatakeyama, N. Shimizu, A. Hikima, J. Aoki, and K. Endo, “MR evaluation of the hippocampus in patients with congenital malformations of the brain,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 389–393, 2001.
[7]  A. Righini, S. Zirpoli, C. Parazzini et al., “Hippocampal infolding angle changes during brain development assessed by prenatal MR imaging,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2093–2097, 2006.
[8]  J. Huang, I. Y. Wah, R. K. Pooh, and K. W. Choy, “Molecular genetics in fetal neurology,” Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 341–346, 2012.
[9]  E. Roessler and M. Muenke, “The molecular genetics of holoprosencephaly,” American Journal of Medical Genetics C, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 52–61, 2010.
[10]  G. Alvarez-Bolado, F. A. Paul, and S. Blaess, “Sonic hedgehog lineage in the mouse hypothalamus: from progenitor domains to hypothalamic regions,” Neural Development, vol. 7, no. 1, article 4, 2012.
[11]  M. Fernandes and J. M. Hébert, “The ups and downs of holoprosencephaly: dorsal versus ventral patterning forces,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 413–423, 2008.
[12]  B. D. Solomon, A. Gropman, and M. Muenke, “Holoprosencephaly overview,” Gene Reviews, 2000.
[13]  M. M. Cohen Jr., “Holoprosencephaly: clinical, anatomic, and molecular dimensions,” Birth Defects Research A, vol. 76, no. 9, pp. 658–673, 2006.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413