全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Evaluation of Airway Scope at Improving the Success Rate of the First Intubation Attempt by Nonexpert Physicians: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study

DOI: 10.5402/2012/237949

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Purpose. The aim of the study was to assess the performance of Airway Scope (AWS) on the first attempt at intubation in manikins by nonexpert physicians. Methods. A randomized crossover trial involving seven scenarios. Participants: residents of a cardiovascular hospital. In group A, the AWS procedure was performed first followed by Machintouch Laryngoscopy (ML), while in group B the ML procedure was performed first and then the AWS. The primary outcome assessed was the success of first intubation attempt in a normal scenario. The secondary outcome assessments were success in six other scenarios, and also elapsed time and dental trauma caused in all scenarios. Results. There were 34 participants. All AWS-assisted intubations were successfully completed, but one ML-assisted intubation failed in the normal scenario ( ). The outcomes achieved by the AWS in scenarios involving cervical immobilization ( ), tongue edema ( ), pharyngeal obstruction ( ), and jaw trismus ( ) were superior to those obtained with the ML. Conclusions. Use of AWS-assisted intubation in manikin scenarios results in a significantly high intubation success rate on the first attempt by nonexpert physicians. These findings suggest this new device will be useful for nonexpert physicians in emergency situations. 1. Introduction Tracheal intubation outside the operation room is often performed by physicians who have less experience in airway management than anesthesiologists. The need for emergency airway management in a suboptimal environment can make intubation difficult, and this may affect patient safety. Direct laryngoscopy and intubation remain a challenge to nonexperts [1, 2]. Several different video laryngoscopy devices such as Airway Scope (AWS, Pentax, Tokyo, Japan) provide better laryngeal views than conventional laryngoscopy in controlled setting studies with anesthesiologists [3, 4]. The AWS consists of two components: a display-handle with a fibre-optic scope unit and a disposable blade (Intlock). The shape of the Intlock is designed to provide a view of the glottis without requiring alignment of the oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes. Therefore, AWS is thought to be a more useful tool for observing the glottis than a laryngoscope [5]. The aim of the present study was to assess AWS performance in the first tracheal intubation attempt by non-expert physicians. 2. Methods 2.1. Study Design This study was designed as an open randomized crossover manikin trial. The participants were divided into two groups (group A, in which the AWS was used for the first procedure followed by

References

[1]  P. Gerbeaux, “Should emergency medical service rescuers be trained to practice endotracheal intubation?” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1864–1865, 2005.
[2]  J. T. Mulcaster, J. Mills, O. R. Hung et al., “Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance,” Anesthesiology, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 23–27, 2003.
[3]  A. Suzuki, Y. Toyama, N. Katsumi et al., “The Pentax-AWS rigid indirect video laryngoscope: clinical assessment of performance in 320 cases,” Anaesthesia, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 641–647, 2008.
[4]  T. Asai, E. H. Liu, S. Matsumoto et al., “Use of the pentax-aws in 293 patients with difficult airways,” Anesthesiology, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 898–904, 2009.
[5]  J. Koyama, T. Aoyama, Y. Kusano, et al., “Description and first clinical application of AirWay Scope for tracheal intubation,” Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 247–250, 2006.
[6]  S. J. Senn, Cross-Over Trials in Clinical Research, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 2002.
[7]  P. Sarkar, G. Nicholson, and G. Hall, “Brief review: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angioedema: anesthetic implications,” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 994–1003, 2006.
[8]  A. Ovassapian, R. Glassenberg, G. I. Randel, A. Klock, P. S. Mesnick, and J. M. Klafta, “The unexpected difficult airway and lingual tonsil hyperplasia,” Anesthesiology, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 124–132, 2002.
[9]  T. C. Mort, “Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 607–613, 2004.
[10]  R. W. Neumar, C. W. Otto, M. S. Link et al., “Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care,” Circulation, vol. 122, pp. S729–S767, 2010.
[11]  K. Maruyama, T. Yamada, R. Kawakami, and K. Hara, “Randomized cross-over comparison of cervical-spine motion with the AirWay Scope or Macintosh laryngoscope with in-line stabilization: a video-fluoroscopic study,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 563–567, 2008.
[12]  T. Miki, G. Inagawa, T. Kikuchi, Y. Koyama, and T. Goto, “Evaluation of the Airway Scope, a new video laryngoscope, in tracheal intubation by naive operators: a manikin study,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1378–1381, 2007.
[13]  Y. Hirabayash, “Airway Scope versus Macintosh laryngoscope: a manikin study,” Emergency Medicine Journal, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 357–358, 2007.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413