全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Diurnal Temperature Range for Europe: A Search for Cosmic Ray Forbush Decrease Manifestations and the DTR Periodicities

DOI: 10.1155/2013/982539

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Following on previous work by others, which gave evidence for few days’ changes in the European Diurnal Temperature Range (DTR) apparently correlated with Cosmic Ray Forbush Decreases, we have made an independent study. We find no positive evidence. An analysis has also been made of the Fourier components of the time series of the DTR value (taken as deviations from a ±10 day running mean). Evidence for a number of interesting periods is found, including one at about 27 days, albeit with a variability with time. The same period of solar irradiance (particularly in the UV) is favoured as the explanation. 1. Introduction Uncertainty relating to the relevance of Cosmic Rays (CR) to climate change continues. Although some work (our own included—e.g., Erlykin et al. [1–3]) has cast doubts on the claims of Svensmark and Friis-Christensen [4] and others that there is a causal correlation of Low Cloud Cover (LCC, altitude <3.2?km, i.e., the “boundary layer”) with CR intensity, doubts remain. The supporters draw attention to the results from the CLOUD project [5] which give evidence for an effect of accelerator particles on nucleation rates. The supporters also draw attention to the Diurnal Temperature Range (DTR) data from European stations where there is an apparent correlation with Forbush Decreases (FD) according to Dragic et al. [6]. The work just referred to is in the spirit of studies by Lu and Sanche [7], and others, which claimed evidence for CR having an effect on Atmospheric Chlorofluorcarbon Dissociation and Ozone depletion in the Polar atmosphere. It is with the DTR work that we are concerned here. Although the DTR, which is the day-night temperature difference, is affected by a number of atmospheric parameters (cloud cover, precipitation, changes in agriculture, water vapour feedback, etc.) it is an important quantity to study for two reasons. (i)It can be measured in a straightforward way. (ii)It decreased on a global scale from the 1950s onwards, at the time when the mean Global temperature started to increase markedly (Global Warming). DTR has in it therefore a number of (often dependent) climate parameters and these could be, in principle, CR dependent (see [8] for details of DTR for Europe for the range 1950–2005). FD analyses are useful in that for the short time spans involved (days) phenomena other than CR might be expected to change only slowly so that CR effects dominate. 2. Previous FD Studies Searches for the correlation of FD with other atmospheric parameters have already been made. Specifically, Svensmark et al. [9] searched for, and

References

[1]  A. D. Erlykin, “An emission layer as a gravity wave detector,” Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, vol. 71, no. 17-18, pp. 1974–1981, 2009.
[2]  A. D. Erlykin, G. Gyalaic, K. Kudelac, T. Sloand, and A. W. Wolfendaleb, “Some aspects of ionization and the cloud cover, cosmic ray correlation problem,” Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, vol. 71, no. 8-9, pp. 823–829, 2009.
[3]  A. D. Erlykin, T. Sloanc, and A. W. Wolfendaleb, “The search for cosmic ray effects on clouds,” Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, vol. 71, no. 8-9, pp. 955–958, 2009.
[4]  H. Svensmark and E. Friis-Christensen, “Variation of cosmic ray flux and global cloud coverage—a missing link in solar-climate relationships,” Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 1225–1232, 1997.
[5]  J. Kirkby, J. Curtius, J. Almeida, et al., “Role of sulphuric acid, ammonia and galactic cosmic rays in atmospheric aerosol nucleation,” Nature, vol. 476, pp. 429–433, 2011.
[6]  A. Dragic, I. Ani?in, R. Banjanac, et al., “Forbush decreases—clouds relation in the neutron monitor era,” Astrophysics and Space Sciences Transactions, vol. 7, pp. 315–318, 2011.
[7]  Q. B. Lu and L. Sanche, “Effects of cosmic rays on atmospheric chlorofluorocarbon dissociation and ozone depletion,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, no. 7, Article ID 078501, 4 pages, 2001.
[8]  K. Makowski, M. Wild, and A. Ohmura, “Diurnal temperature range over Europe between 1950 and 2005,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 8, pp. 6483–6498, 2008.
[9]  H. Svensmark, T. Bandoll, and J. Svensmark, “Cosmic ray decreases affect atmospheric aerosols and clouds,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 36, Article ID L15101, 4 pages, 2009.
[10]  B. Laken, A. Wolfendale, and D. Kniveton, “Cosmic ray decreases and changes in the liquid water cloud fraction over the oceans,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 36, Article ID L23803, 2009.
[11]  M. Lockwood, “Solar influence on global and regional climates,” Surveys in Geophysics, vol. 3-4, pp. 503–534, 2012.
[12]  L. Dorman, Cosmic Rays, North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974.
[13]  A. Gil, R. Modzelewska, and M. V. Alania, “Features of the 27-day variations of the galactic cosmic ray intensity and anisotropy,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 39, no. 5, p. 1301, 2008.
[14]  J. Pap, W. K. Tobiska, and S. D. Bouwer, “Periodicities of solar irradiance and solar activity indices, I,” Solar Physics, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 165–189, 1990.
[15]  G. J. Rotman, “27-Day variations observed solar u.v. (120-300?nm) irradiance,” Planetary and Space Science, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1001–1007, 1983.
[16]  Oulu Neutron Monitor, http://cr0.izmiran.rssi.ru/oulu/main.htm.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413