全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Decrease Rate of the Renal Diameter in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients

DOI: 10.5402/2013/521949

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

We here present the results of ultrasonographic (US) evaluations on the alteration of renal diameter of chronic HD patients. Of 109 outpatient HD patients who had neither severe acquired cystic disease of the kidney nor hereditary polycystic kidney disease, we performed US two or three times to measure their maximum renal diameter (mean of both kidneys), and the yearly alteration rate was calculated. The average interval of the two measurements was 35.9 months, and the average HD duration from the HD induction to the first measurement was 29.5 months. The average decrease rate of renal diameter was (SE) mm/year. No statistical difference was seen on the decrease rate in relation to gender, age and original disease (among three groups, glomerulonephritis and IgA nephropathy, diabetes, and others including hypertension). However, the decrease rate was large when the first measurement was close to the induction of hemodialysis, suggesting that the alteration rate reduced according to the hemodialysis vintage ( ?mm/year, first measurement not more than 10 months after induction of HD and ?mm/year, first measurement more than 80 months after induction of HD). Renal diameter decreased approximately 4.3?mm each year, and the decrease rate slowed as the length of time on dialysis increased. 1. Introduction It is well known that the kidney size of the patient undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD) gradually decreases [1]. However, only a few reports are there on the study of the actual decrease rate [2–4]. On the other hand, scheduled ultrasonographic (US) examination of kidney after induction of HD is important to check the progression of acquired cystic disease of kidney (ACDK) and renal cancer which may arise in ACDK [5, 6]. We examined the renal longest diameter of chronic HD patient at the scheduled US kidney checkup [7], calculated the alteration rate of the size in the same patients, and studied the difference of the alteration rate among the factors such as gender, age, and original diseases. 2. Subjects and Methods Of 229 outpatient chronic hemodialysis patients, 109 patients, who had neither hereditary polycystic disease nor severe acquired cystic disease of kidney, were selected; we performed ultrasonography (US) twice or three times to measure their maximum renal diameter (mean of both kidneys), and the yearly alteration rate of the diameter was calculated. The US study was performed by a sole medical examiner. The largest caliber of the imaged kidney was measured using the measurement tool loaded in the US machine (Aroca SSD-280, Toshiba Nemio 30,

References

[1]  S. Takebayashi, “Sonographic evaluation of kidneys undergoing dialysis,” Urologic Radiology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 69–74, 1985.
[2]  T. Uchida, “Developmental process of acquired renal cysts and neoplasms in patients receiving chronic hemodialysis: ultrasonographic, morphometric and histopathological studies,” Japanese Journal of Nephrology, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 889–897, 1991.
[3]  S. Yamaguchi, H. Fujii, S. Kaneko et al., “Ultrasonographic study on kidneys in patients with chronic renal failure—part I: ultrasonic measurement of renal size and analysis of renal ultrasonotomograms,” Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 1175–1182, 1990.
[4]  P. L. Allan, “Ultrasonography of the native kidney in dialysis and transplant patients,” Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 557–567, 1992.
[5]  M. S. Dunnill, P. R. Millard, and D. Oliver, “Acquired cystic disease of the kidneys; a hazard of long-term intermittent maintenance haemodialysis,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 868–877, 1977.
[6]  I. Ishikawa, Y. Saito, and Z. Onouchi, “Development of acquired cystic disease and adenocarcinoma of the kidney in glomerulonephritic chronic hemodialysis patients,” Clinical Nephrology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 1980.
[7]  M. J. Ablett, A. Coulthard, R. E. J. Lee et al., “How reliable are ultrasound measurements of renal length in adults?” The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 68, no. 814, pp. 1087–1089, 1995.
[8]  G. Zerbini, R. Bonfanti, F. Meschi et al., “Persistent renal hypertrophy and faster decline of glomerular filtration rate precede the development of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2620–2625, 2006.
[9]  V. Rigalleau, M. Garcia, C. Lasseur et al., “Large kidneys predict poor renal outcome in subjects with diabetes and chronic kidney disease,” BMC Nephrology, vol. 11, no. 1, article 3, 2010.

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133