High-volume horizontal hydraulic fracturing of shale formations has the potential to make natural gas a significant, economical energy source, but the potential for harm to human health is often dismissed by proponents of this method. While adverse health outcomes of medical conditions with long latency periods will not be evident for years and will depend on the exposure, duration of exposure, dose, and other factors, we argue that it would be prudent to begin to track and monitor trends in the incidence and prevalence of diseases that already have been shown to be influenced by environmental agents. The dirty downside of modern, unconventional natural gas development, as well as the potential for harm, is discussed. 1. Introduction A modern form of natural gas development has become a global “game changer” in the quest for energy. Natural gas, abundant around the world, has a clean reputation compared to other fossil fuels since it burns less carbon when used. It is easy to transport, reasonably economical, and requires comparatively quick construction timelines and low capital costs. Traditionally, natural gas was extracted using a method that bores a vertical well in single gas reservoirs close to the surface (conventional natural gas drilling). However, drilling for natural gas in shale rock was not particularly economical, primarily because shale typically has insufficient permeability to allow significant fluid flow to a well bore. With technological advances and unconventional methods (i.e., horizontal hydraulic fracturing), gas extraction from tight formations (e.g., shale) is now feasible. This type of unconventional natural gas development relies on clustered, multi-well pads and long, horizontal laterals. Wells are drilled vertically (often thousands of feet) and horizontally in multiple directions. The method entails injecting large volumes of fluid consisting of chemicals, water, and sand into the well to fracture the shale rock that releases the natural gas. The internal pressure of the rock formation also causes a portion of the injected fracking fluids to return to the surface (flowback fluids); these fluids are often stored in a tank or pit before being pumped into trucks for transport to a disposal site. Flowback has been shown to contain a variety of formation materials, including brines, heavy metals, radionuclides, and organics, which can make wastewater treatment difficult and expensive [1]. Further, other studies found that 20% to 85% of fracturing fluids may remain in the formation, which means the fluids could continue to be a
References
[1]
D. J. Soeder and W. M. Kappel, “Water resources and natural gas production from the Marcellus Shale,” U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2009–3032, 2009.
[2]
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), “Evaluation Impacts to Underground Sources of Drinking Water by Hydraulic Fracturing of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs,” June 2004, http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw/uic/pdfs/cbmstudy_attach_uic_ch04_hyd_frac_fluids.pdf.
[3]
I. Urbana, Regulation Lax as Gas Wells’ Tainted Water Hits Rivers, New York Times, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
[4]
National Research Council, Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1993.
[5]
R. Barouki, P. D. Gluckman, P. Grandjean, M. Hanson, and J. J. Heindel, “Developmental origins of non-communicable disease: implications for research and Public Health,” Environmental Health, vol. 11, pp. 42–51, 2012.
[6]
P. J. Landrigan, C. B. Schechter, J. M. Lipton, M. C. Fahs, and J. Schwartz, “Environmental pollutants and disease in American children: estimates of morbidity, mortality, and costs for lead poisoning, asthma, cancer, and developmental disabilities,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 110, no. 7, pp. 721–728, 2002.
[7]
K. W. Whitworth, E. Symanski, and A. L. Coker, “Childhood lymphohematopoietic cancer incidence and hazardous air pollutants in Southeast Texas, 1995–2004,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 116, no. 11, pp. 1576–1580, 2008.
[8]
P. J. Lupo, E. Symanski, D. Kim Waller et al., “Maternal exposure to ambient levels of Benzene and Neural tube defects among offspring: Texas, 1999–2004,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 397–402, 2011.
[9]
R. Slama, O. Thiebaugeorges, V. Goua et al., “Maternal personal exposure to airborne benzene and intrauterine growth,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 117, no. 8, pp. 1313–1321, 2009.
[10]
R. Barouki, P. D. Gluckman, P. Grandjean, M. Hanson, and J. J. Heindel, “Developmental origins of non-communicable disease: implications for research and public health,” Environmental Health, vol. 11, pp. 42–51, 2012.
[11]
L. Trasande and Y. Liu, “Reducing the staggering costs of environmental disease in children, estimated at $76. 6 billion in 2008,” Health Affairs, vol. 30, pp. 863–870, 2011.
[12]
R. J. Landrigan and L. R. Goldman, “Children’s vulnerability to toxic chemicals: a challenge and opportunity to strengthen health and environmental policy,” Health Affairs, vol. 30, pp. 842–850, 2011.
[13]
February 2013, http://www.marcellusgas.org/.
[14]
PennEnvironment Research & Policy Center, “In the Shadow of the Marcellus Boom,” Tech. Rep., May 2011, http://www.pennenvironment.org/reports/pae/shadow-marcellus-boom.
[15]
R. L. Kosnik, “The oil and gas industry’s exclusions and exemptions to major environmental statutes. Oil and gas accountability project,” Tech. Rep., 2007, http://www.ogap.org/.
[16]
T. Colborn, C. Kwiatkowski, K. Schultz, and M. Bachran, “Natural gas operations from a public health perspective,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, pp. 17–15, 2011.
[17]
T. Colburn, Spreadsheet of Products, Chemicals and Their Health Effects, The Endocrine Disruption Exchange, Paonia, Colo, USA, 2013, http://www.endocrinedisruption.org/chemicals.multistate.php.
[18]
M. Jerrett, R. T. Burnett, C. Arden Pope et al., “Long-term ozone exposure and mortality,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, no. 11, pp. 1085–1095, 2009.
[19]
R. Witter, K. Stinson, H. Sackett, et al., “Potential exposure-related human health effects of oil and gas development,” A White Paper, 2008, http://docs.nrdc.org/health/files/hea_08091702A.pdf.
[20]
L. M. McKenzie, R. Z. Witter, L. S. Newman, and J. L. Adgate, “Human health risk assessment of air emissions from development of unconventional natural gas resources,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 424, pp. 79–87, 2012.
[21]
D. J. Rozell and S. J. Reaven, “Water pollution risk associated with natural gas extraction from the Marcellus Shale,” Risk Analysis, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1382–1393, 2011.
[22]
R. Hammer and J. VanBriesen, “In fracking’s wake: new rules are needed to protect our health and environment from contaminated wastewater,” Tech. Rep., NRDC, Washington, DC, USA, 2012, http://www.nrdc.org/energy/files/Fracking-Wastewater-FullReport.pdf.
[23]
I. Urbana, Regulation Lax as Gas Wells’ Tainted Water Hits Rivers, New York Times, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
[24]
EPA, “EPA Releases Draft Findings of Pavillion, Wyoming Ground Water Investigation for Public Comment and Independent Scientific Review,” 2011, http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/EF35BD26A80D6CE3852579600065C94E.
[25]
K. Sinding, “Is Dimock's Water Really Safe? One Federal Health Agency Is Not so Sure,” Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC): Switchboard. September 2012, http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/ksinding/is_dimocks_water_really_safe_o.html.
[26]
S. G. Osborn, A. Vengosh, N. R. Warner, and R. B. Jackson, “Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 20, pp. 8172–8176, 2011.
[27]
Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), “Worker Exposure to Silica During Hydraulic Fracturing,” United States Department of Labor, February 2013, http://www.osha.gov/dts/hazardalerts/hydraulic_frac_hazard_alert.html.
[28]
M. Jerrett, R. T. Burnett, C. Arden Pope et al., “Long-term ozone exposure and mortality,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, no. 11, pp. 1085–1095, 2009.