Scientific advances made in the 21st century contend that the forces of nature and nurture work together through an ongoing series of complex correspondences between brain and mental activity in our daily activities with others. Jung’s cosmological model of the psyche minimizes the fundamental corporeal condition of human nature and as such is critiqued and amended, influenced by the transcendental materialist theories of subjectivity inspired by ？i？ek, Johnston and Laplanche.
References
[1]
Hogan, T. From Supervenience to Superdupervenience: Meeting the Demands of a Material World. Mind 1993, 102, 555–583, doi:10.1093/mind/102.408.555.
[2]
Johnston, A.; Malabou, C. Self and Emotional Life Philosophy, Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
[3]
Aamodt, S.; Wang, S. Welcome to Your Child’s Brain; Bloomsbury: New York, NY, USA, 2011.
[4]
Alaimo, S. Bodily Natures Science, Environment, and the Material Self; Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN, USA, 2010. New materialism is an approach that upholds the importance of materiality that has and is emerging in the 21st century. It cannot be contained to a single approach and includes a wide variety of realist perspectives to include the disciplines of feminist and queer theory, disability studies, cultural studies, science studies and neuropsychoanalysis.
[5]
Alaimo, S.; Hekman, S. Material Feminisms; Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN, USA, 2008.
[6]
Jung, C.G. The Conjunction. In The Collected Works of C. G. Jung; Routledge & Kegan Paul: London, UK, 1970; Volume 8.
[7]
Damasio, A. The Feeling of What Happens; Harcourt, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1999.
[8]
Solms, M.; Turnbull, O. The Brain and the Inner World: An Introduction to the Neuroscience of Subjective Experience; Other Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002.
[9]
Roesler, C. Are archetypes transmitted more by culture than biology? Questions arising from conceptualizations of the archetype. J. Anal. Psychol. 2012, 57, 223–246, doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2011.01963.x.
[10]
Kristeva, J. Black Sun Depression and Melancholia; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1989.
[11]
Brothers, L. The trouble with neurobiological explanations of mind. Psychoanal. Inq. 2002, 22, 857–870, doi:10.1080/07351692209349021.
[12]
Verhaeghe, P. Psychoanalysis in Times of Science. Journal of the Jan van Eyke Circle for Lacanian Ideology Critique 2012, 4, 11–23.
[13]
Blass, R.; Carmeli, Z. The Case against Neuropsychoanalysis: On Fallacies Underlying Psychoanalysis’ latest Scientific Trend and Its Negative Impact on Psychoanalytic Discourse. Int. J. Psychoanal. 2007, 88, 19–40, doi:10.1516/6NCA-A4MA-MFQ7-0JTJ.
[14]
Carmeli, Z.; Blass, R. The case against neuroplastic analysis: A further illustration of the irrelevance of neuroscience to psychoanalysis through a critique of Doidge’s The Brain that Changes Itself. Int. J. Psychoanal. 2013, 94, 391–410, doi:10.1111/1745-8315.12022.
[15]
Talvitie, T.; Ihanus, J. On neuropsychoanalytic metaphysics. Int. J. Psychoanal. 2011, 92, 1583–1601, doi:10.1111/j.1745-8315.2011.00458.x.
[16]
Freud, A. The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense; Karmac Books: Exeter, UK, 1993.
[17]
Allan Schore. Available online: http://www.alanschore.com/ (accessed on 5 May 2013).
[18]
Fairbairne, R. Psychological Studies of the Personality; Routledge & Kegan Paul: London, UK, 1952.
[19]
Waintrater, R. Intersubjectivity and French Psychoanalysis: A Misunderstanding? Stud. Gender Sex. 2012, 13, 295–302, doi:10.1080/15240657.2012.735584.
[20]
Fonagy, P. Attachment Theory and Psychoanalysis; Other Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001.
Knox, J. Archetype, Attachment, Analysis. Jungian Psychology and the Emergent Mind; Brunner-Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
[23]
Hogenson, G.B. Archetypes: Emergence and the Psyche’s Deep Structure. In Analytical Psychology: Contemporary Perspectives in Jungian Psychology; Cambray, J., Carter, L., Eds.; Brunner-Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2004.
[24]
Laplanche, J. Freud and the Sexual: Essays 2000–2006. IPBooks, International Psychoanalytic Media Group; 2011.
[25]
Hinton, L. New School for Analytical Psychology. Seattle, WA, USA. Personal communication, 2013.
[26]
Kant, I. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View; Southern Illinois University Press: Carbondale, IL, USA, 1978.
[27]
Kant, I. Critique of Pure Reason; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998.
[28]
Tougas, C. The Phenomena of Awareness Husserl, Cantor, Jung; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
[29]
Johnston, A. Time Driven Metapsychology and the Splitting of the Drive; Northwestern University Press: Evanston, IL, USA, 2005.
[30]
Kant, I. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysic; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005.
[31]
Brooks, R.M. Un-thought out metaphysics in analytical psychology. J. Anal. Psychol. 2011, 4, 492–513, doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2011.01925.x.
[32]
Weizman, E. Hollow Land: Israel’s Architecture of Occupation; Verso: London, UK, 2007.
Jung, C.G. Psychology and Religion: West and East. In The Collected Works of C.G. Jung; Routledge and Kegan Paul: London, UK, 1938; Volume 11.
[38]
Brooks, R.M. The ethical dimensions of life and analytic work through a Levinasian lens. Int. J. Jungian Stud. 2013, 1, 88–99.
[39]
Johnston, A. ？i？ek’s Ontology A Transcendental Materialist Theory of Subjectivity; Northwestern University Press: Evanston, IL, USA, 2008. Johnston consistently demonstrates a masterful capacity to succinctly summarize dense philosophical material. On this ？？i？？ek comments in a blurb on the back-cover of this text: ‘While reading it, I often had the uncanny feeling of being confronted by a line of argument which fits better than my own texts what I am struggling to formulate-as if he is the original and I am a copy’.
[40]
Johnston, A. Against embodiment: The material ground of the immaterial subject. Int. J. Lacanian Stud. 2004, 2, 230–254.
[41]
？i？ek, S. The Sublime Object of Ideology; Vergo: London, UK, 1989.
[42]
？i？ek, S.; Daly, G. Conversations with ？i？ek; Polity Press: Malden, MA, USA, 2004.
[43]
？i？ek, S. How to Read Lacan; W.W. Norton & Company: London, UK, 2006.
[44]
Zizek, S. The matrix, or two sides of perversion. Available online: http://www.egs.edu/faculty/slavoj-zizek/articles/the-matrix-or-two-sides-of-perversion/ (accessed on 5 May 2013).
[45]
Levinas, E. Basic Philosophical Writings; Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN, USA, 1996.
[46]
Levinas, E. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority; Duquesne University Press: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1969.
[47]
Barnard, S. Diachrony, tuchè, and the ethical subject in Levinas and Lacan. In Psychology for the Other: Levinas Ethics and the Practice of Psychology; Gantt, E.E., Williams, R.N., Eds.; Duquesne University Press: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2002.
[48]
Levinas, E. Otherwise than Being or beyond Essence; Duquesne University Press: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2008.
[49]
？i？ek, S. The Parallax View; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2006.
[50]
Laplanche, J. The other within: Rethinking psychoanalysis (interview). Radic. Philos. 2000, 102, 31–41. interviewed by Fletcher, J. and Osborne, P.
[51]
Laplanche, J. Essays on Otherness; Routledge: London, UK, 1999.
[52]
Scarfone, D. A brief introduction to the work of Jean Laplanche. Int. J. Psychoanal. 2013, 3, 545–566, doi:10.1111/1745-8315.12063.
[53]
Hinton, L. The enigmatic signifier and the decentered subject. J. Anal. Psychol. 2009, 54, 637–657, doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01811.x.
[54]
Shamdasani, S. Jung and the Making of Modern Psychology the Dream of a Science; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003.
[55]
Fordham, M. Memories and thoughts about C.G. Jung. J. Anal. Psychol. 1975, 20, 102–113, doi:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1975.00102.x.
[56]
Jung, C.G. Psychology and Religion: West and East. In The Collected Works of C. G. Jung; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1975; Volume 11.
[57]
Jung, C.G. The Psychology of the Child Archetype. In The Collected Works of C.G. Jung; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1981; Volume 9.
