Interest in the potential of smart grid to transform the way societies generate, distribute, and use electricity has increased dramatically over the past decade. A smarter grid could contribute to both climate change mitigation and adaptation by increasing low-carbon electricity production and enhancing system reliability and resilience. However, climate goals are not necessarily essential for smart grid. Climate change is only one of many considerations motivating innovation in electricity systems, and depending on the path of grid modernization, a future smart grid might do little to reduce, or could even exacerbate, risks associated with climate change. This paper identifies tensions within a shared smart grid vision and illustrates how competing societal priorities are influencing electricity system innovation. Co-existing but divergent priorities among key actors’ are mapped across two critical dimensions: centralized versus decentralized energy systems and radical versus incremental change. Understanding these tensions provides insights on how climate change objectives can be integrated to shape smart grid development. Electricity system change is context-specific and path-dependent, so specific strategies linking smart grid and climate change need to be developed at local, regional, and national levels. And while incremental improvements may bring short term gains, a radical transformation is needed to realize climate objectives.
References
[1]
Kasperson, R.E.; Ram, B. Rapid Transformation of the US Electric Power System: Prospects and Impediments. In Toward Successful Adaptation: Linking Science and Practice in Managing Climate Change Impacts; Moser, S., Boykoff, M., Eds.; Routledge: Oxon, UK, 2013.
[2]
International Energy Agency. IEA: Paris, France, 2012. Available online: http://www.iea.org/co2highlights/co2highlights.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2013).
[3]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In The Mitigation of Climate Change, Working Group III Report; Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave, R., Meyer, L.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007.
[4]
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/global.html#two (accessed on 28 August 2013).
[5]
World Energy Outlook Factsheet. Available online: http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/media/weowebsite/2012/factsheets.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2013).
[6]
International Atomic Energy Agency. Energy, Electricity and Nuclear Power Estimates for the Period up to 2050. IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 2011. Available online: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/RDS1_31.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2013).
[7]
Mah, D.N.; van der Vleuten, J.M.; Hills, P.; Tao, J. Consumer perceptions of smart grid development: Results of a Hong Kong survey and policy implications. Energ. Policy 2012, 49, 204–216, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.055.
[8]
Levinson, M. Is the smart grid really a smart idea? Issues Sci. Technol. 2010, 27, 39–48.
[9]
Yu, Y.; Yang, J.; Chen, B. The smart grids in china–A review. Energies 2012, 5, 1321–1338, doi:10.3390/en5051321.
[10]
Schleicher-Tappeser, R. The Smart Grids Debate in Europe. SEFEP Working Paper; Smart Energy for Europe Platform (SEFEP): Berlin, Germany, 2012.
[11]
Brown, M.A.; Zhou, S. Smart-grid policies: An international review. WIREs Energy Environ. 2013, 2, 121–139.
[12]
Giordano, V.; Gangale, F.; Fulli, G.; Sánchez-Jiménez, M. Smart Grid Projects in Europe: Lessons Learned and Current Developments. Publications office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2011. Available online: http://ses.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/ses/files/documents/smart_grid_projects_in_europe_ lessons_learned_and_current_developments.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2013).
[13]
Quinn, E.L.; Reed, A.L. Envisioning the smart grid: Network architecture, information control, and the public policy balancing act. Colo. Law Rev. 2010, 81, 833–892.
[14]
Morgan, M.G.; Apt, J.; Lave, L.B.; Ilic, M.D.; Sirbu, M.; Peha, J.M. The Many Meanings of Smart Grid. Available online: http://www.epp.cmu.edu/Publications/Policy_Brief_Smart_Grid_July_09.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2013).
[15]
Giordano, V.; Fulli, G. A business case for smart grid technologies: A systemic perspective. Energ. Policy 2012, 40, 252–259.
[16]
Verbong, G.; Geels, F. Future Electricity Systems: Visions, Scenario’s and Transition. In Governing the Energy Transition: Reality, Illusion or Necessity?; Verbong, G., Loorbach, D., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2012; pp. 400–434.
[17]
Kostyk, T.; Herkert, J. Societal implications of the emerging smart grid. Commun. ACM 2012, 55, 34–36, doi:10.1145/2366316.2366328.
[18]
Hoag, H. Low-carbon electricity for 2030. Nat. Climate Change 2011, 1, 233–235, doi:10.1038/nclimate1188.
[19]
Siddiqui, O. The Green Grid: Energy Savings and Carbon Emissions Reductions Enabled by a Smart Grid; Electric Power Research Institute: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2008.
[20]
Tran, M.; Banister, D.; Bishop, J.D.K.; McCulloch, M.D. Realizing the electric-vehicle revolution. Nat. Climate Change 2012, 2, 328–333, doi:10.1038/nclimate1429.
[21]
Frondel, M.; Vance, C. Energy efficiency: Don’t belittle the rebound effect. Nature 2013, 494, 430, doi:10.1038/494430c.
[22]
Stephens, J.C.; Wilson, E.J.; Peterson, T.R. Socio-political evaluation of energy deployment (speed): An integrated research framework analyzing energy technology deployment. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2008, 75, 1224–1246, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.12.003.
[23]
Hirsh, R. Technology and Transformation in the American Electric Utility; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1989; p. 292.
[24]
Munson, R. From Edison to Enron: The Business of Power and What it Means for the Future of Electricity; Praeger: Westport, CT, USA, 2005; p. 216.
[25]
Perez, C. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2002; p. 208.
[26]
Amin, M.; Wollenberg, B.F. Toward a smart grid: Power delivery for the 21st century. IEEE Power Energ. Mag. 2005, 3, 34–41, doi:10.1109/MPAE.2005.1507024.
[27]
Marris, E. Energy: Upgrading the grid. Nature 2008, 454, 570–573, doi:10.1038/454570a.
[28]
EPRI. Estimating the Costs and Benefits of the Smart Grid: A Preliminary Estimate of the Investment Requirements and the Resultant Benefits of a Fully Functioning Smart Grid; Electric Power Research Institute: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2011.
[29]
Basiago, A.D. The limits of technological optimism. Environmentalist 1994, 14, 17–22, doi:10.1007/BF01902656.
[30]
Mitchell, R.B. Technology is not enough: Climate change, population, affluence, and consumption. J. Environ. Dev. 2012, 21, 24–27, doi:10.1177/1070496511435670.
[31]
Strengers, Y. The Smart Nirvana: Old Visions of The New Smart Energy Consumer. In Proceedings of the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S) Annual Conference; Copenhagen, Denmark: 17–20 October 2012.
[32]
Krishnamurti, T.; Schwartz, D.; Davis, A.; Fischhoff, B.; Bruine de Bruin, W.; Lave, L.; Wang, J. Preparing for smart grid technologies: A behavioral decision research approach to understanding consumer expectations about smart meters. Energ. Policy 2012, 41, 790–797, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.047.
[33]
Verbong, G.P.J.; Geels, F.W. Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2010, 77, 1214–1221, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.008.
[34]
Wolsink, M. The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 822–835, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.006.
[35]
Ulleg？rd, J. Commission Reiterates Focus on Smart Grid. Available online: http://www.danishenergyassociation.com/Theme/Smart_Grid.aspx (accessed on 28 August 2013).
[36]
Pentland, W. Distributed Energy: The Answer to the Energy Problem. Forbes 2008.
[37]
Kind, P. Disruptive Challenges:Financial Implications and Strategic Responses to a Changing Retail Electric Business. Edison Electric Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. Available online: http://www.eei.org/ourissues/finance/Documents/disruptivechallenges.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2013).
[38]
Klass, A.B. Renewable Energy and the Public Trust Doctrine. Available online: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1789027 (accessed on 28 August 2013).
[39]
Freeman, C. The greening of technology and models of innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 1996, 53, 27–39, doi:10.1016/0040-1625(96)00060-1.
[40]
Edquist, C. Reflections on the systems of innovation approach. Sci. Publ. Pol. 2004, 31, 485–490, doi:10.3152/147154304781779741.
[41]
Hekkert, M.P.; Suurs, R.A.A.; Negro, S.O.; Kuhlmann, S.; Smits, R. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Forecast. Soc. Change 2007, 74, 413–432, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002.
[42]
Lundvall, B.A. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning; Anthem Press: London, UK, 2010.
[43]
Kemp, R. Opportunities for a Green Industrial Policy Froman Evolutionary Technology Perspective. In Green Industrial Restructuring: International Case Studies and Theoretical Interpretations; Binder, M., Janicke, M., Petschow, U., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2001; pp. 151–170.
[44]
Geels, F.W. The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 2005, 17, 445–476, doi:10.1080/09537320500357319.
[45]
Geels, F.W.; Schot, J. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res. Policy 2007, 36, 399–417.
[46]
Meadowcroft, J. Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environ. Innovat. Soc. Transit. 2011, 1, 70–75, doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003.
