One way to view ‘equitable pedagogy’ is through an opportunity to learn (OTL) lens, meaning that regardless of race, class, or culture, a student has access to rigorous and meaningful content, as well as appropriate resources and instruction necessary to learn and demonstrate understanding of that content. Assessment holds a unique position in the classroom in that it can both uncover whether inequitable conditions exist ( i.e., performance gaps, denied OTL) and provide an OTL by mediating communication between teacher and students regarding learning progress and what is important to learn. Nevertheless, individuals entering teacher education programs often hold deficit views toward marginalized students, such as Language Minorities (LMs), believe that assessment strictly serves to evaluate learning, and do not do consider how language and culture influence student thinking–views supplanting assessment’s role at supporting an equitable pedagogy for LMs. Through surveys, interviews, program artifacts, and classroom observation, I report on a case study of one pre-service physics teacher, Dean, to depict how his expertise at assessing science did evolve throughout his yearlong teacher education program in terms of (a) becoming more knowledgeable of the role of language and (b) developing a belief in incorporating ‘discourse’ while assessing science. Within the case study, I analyze one particular episode from Dean’s teaching practicum to highlight remaining challenges for pre-service teachers to integrate science and language in classroom assessment—namely, interpreting students’ use of language along with their understanding of core science ideas. The findings underscore the need for connecting language and equity issues to content-area assessment in teacher preparation.
References
[1]
Bryan, L.A.; Atwater, M.M. Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparation programs. Sci. Educ. 2002, 6, 821–839.
[2]
National Research Council. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas; National Academy Press: Washington, D.C., USA, 2012.
[3]
Common Core State Standards Initiative. Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts; National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers: Washington, D.C., USA, 2010.
[4]
Bartolome, L.I. Creating an Equal Playing Field: Teachers as Advocates, Border Crossers and Cultural Brokers. In The Power of Culture: Teaching across Language Difference; Beykont, Z.F., Ed.; Harvard Education Publishing Group: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2002; pp. 167–191.
[5]
Wong-Fillmore, L. English learners and mathematics learning: Language issues to consider. Assess. Math. Profic. 2007, 53, 333–344, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511755378.026.
[6]
Cochran‐Smith, M. The new teacher education in the United States: directions forward. Teach. Teach. Theory Pract. 2008, 14, 271–282, doi:10.1080/13540600802037678.
[7]
Lee, O.; Luykx, A. Science Education and Student Diversity: Synthesis and Research Agenda; Cambridge University Press: England, UK, 2006.
[8]
Oakes, J. Multiplying Inequalities: The Effects of race, Social Class, and Tracking on Opportunities to Learn Mathematics and Science, R-39928-NSF; RAND: Santa Monica, FL, USA, 1990.
[9]
Pullin, D.C.; Haertel, E.H. Assessment, Equity, and Opportunity to Learn. In Assessment, Equity, and Opportunity to Learn; Moss, A.M., Pullin, D.C., Lee, J.P., Haertel, E.H., Young, L.J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008; pp. 17–40.
[10]
Black, P.; Wiliam, D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract. 1998, 5, 7–74, doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.
[11]
Black, P.; Harrison, C.; Lee, C.; Marshall, B.; Wiliam, D. Assessment for Learning: Putting it into Practice; Open University Press: Buckingham, UK, 2003.
[12]
Shepard, L.A. Classroom Assessmen. In Educational Measurement, 4th ed.; Brennan, R.L., Ed.; Praeger Pub Text: Westport, CT, USA, 2006.
[13]
Stiggins, R.J. Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappan 2002, 83, 758–765.
[14]
Vygotsky, L.S. Thought and Language; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1986.
[15]
Warren, B; Ballenger, C.; Ogonowski, M.; Rosebery, A.S.; Hudicourt-Barnes, J. Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2001, 38, 529–552, doi:10.1002/tea.1017.
[16]
Moss, P.A. Sociocultural Implications for Assessment I: Classroom Assessment. In Assessment, Equity and Opportunity to Learn; Moss, A.M., Pullin, D.C., Lee, J.P., Haertel, E.H., Young, L.J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008; pp. 222–258.
[17]
Rea-Dickins, P. Mirror, mirror on the wall: Identifying processes of classroom assessment. Lang. Test. 2001, 18, 429–462.
[18]
Solano-Flores, G.; Nelson-Barber, S. On the cultural validity of science assessments. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2001, 38, 553–573, doi:10.1002/tea.1018.
[19]
Lee, O. Equity for culturally and linguistically diverse students in science education: A research agenda. Teach. Coll. Record 2003, 105, 465–489.
[20]
Halliday, M.A.K.; Martin, J.R. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power; University of Pittsburgh Press: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1993.
[21]
Lemke, J.L. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values; Ablex Publishing Corporation: Norwood, NJ, USA, 1990.
[22]
Veel, R. Learning How to Mean—Scientifically Speaking: Apprenticeship into Scientific Discourse in the Secondary School. In Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School; Christie, F., Martin, J.R., Eds.; Cassell: London, UK, 1997; pp. 160–195.
[23]
Kelly, G.J. Discourse in Science Classrooms. In Handbook of Research on Science Education; Abell, S.K., Lederman, N.G., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 443–470.
[24]
La Celle-Peterson, M.W.; Rivera, C. Is it real for all kids? A framework for equitable assessment policies for English language learners. Harv. Educ. Rev. 1994, 64, 55–75.
[25]
Pearson, P.; Moje, E.; Greenleaf, C. Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science 2010, 328, 459–463, doi:10.1126/science.1182595.
[26]
Driver, R.; Newton, P.; Osborne, J. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Sci. Educ. 2000, 84, 287–312, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A.
[27]
Council of Chief State School Officers. Framework for English Language Proficiency Development Standards Corresponding to the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards; CCSSO: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
[28]
Snow, C.E. Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science 2010, 328, 450–452, doi:10.1126/science.1182597.
[29]
Krajcik, J.S.; Sutherland, L.M. Supporting students in developing literacy in science. Science 2010, 328, 456–459, doi:10.1126/science.1182593.
[30]
Olson, C.B.; Kim, J.S.; Scarcella, R.; Kramer, J.; Pearson, M.; van Dyk, D.A.; Collins, P.; Land, R.E. Enhancing the interpretive reading and analytical writing of mainstreamed English Learners in secondary school: Results from a randomized Field trial using a cognitive strategies approach. Am. Educ. Res. J. 2012, 49, 323–355, doi:10.3102/0002831212439434.
[31]
Cole, M. Can cultural psychology help us think about diversity? Mind Cult. Activ. 1998, 5, 291–304, doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0504_4.
[32]
Stoddart, T.; Pinal, A.; Latzke, M.; Canaday, D. Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2002, 39, 664–687, doi:10.1002/tea.10040.
[33]
Lee, O.; Fradd, S.H. Science for all, including students from non-English-language. Educ. Res. 1998, 27, 12–21.
[34]
Lee, O.; Maerten-Rivera, J.; Penfield, R.D.; LeRoy, K.; Secada, W.G. Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first year professional development intervention. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2008, 45, 31–52, doi:10.1002/tea.20209.
[35]
Lyon, E.G.; Bunch, G.C.; Shaw, J.M. Language demands of an inquiry based science performance assessment: Classroom challenges and opportunities for English learners. Sci. Educ. 2012, 96, 631–651, doi:10.1002/sce.21008.
[36]
Dreyfus, H.; Dreyfus, S. Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer; The Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1986.
[37]
Abedi, J.; Lord, C. The language factor in mathematics tests. Appl. Measur. Educ. 2001, 14, 219–234, doi:10.1207/S15324818AME1403_2.
[38]
Martiniello, M. Language and the performance of English-language learners in math word problems. Harv. Educ. Rev. 2008, 78, 333–368.
[39]
Shaftel, J.; Belton-Kocher, E.; Glasnapp, D.; Poggio, J. The impact of language characteristics in mathematics test items on the performance of English language learners and students with disabilities. Educ. Assess. 2006, 11, 105–126, doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1102_2.
[40]
Solano-Flores, G. Assessing the Cultural Validity of Assessment Practices: An Introduction. In Assessing the Cultural Validity of Assessment Practices: An Introduction; Basterra, M., Trumbull, E., Solano-Flores, G., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 3–21.
[41]
Stobart, G. Fairness in Multicultural Assessment Systems. In Student Assessment and Testing; Wynne, H., Ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008; pp. 346–359.
[42]
Fusco, D.; Barton, A.C. Representing student achievements in science. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2001, 38, 337–354, doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<337::AID-TEA1009>3.0.CO;2-0.
[43]
Vygotsky, L.S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1978.
[44]
Janzen, J. Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Rev. Educ. Res. 2008, 78, 1010–1038, doi:10.3102/0034654308325580.
[45]
Abedi, J.; Hofstetter, C.H.; Lord, C. Assessment accommodations for English language learners: Implications for policy-based empirical research. Rev. Educ. Res. 2004, 74, 1–28, doi:10.3102/00346543074001001.
[46]
Siegel, M.A. Striving for equitable classroom assessments for linguistic minorities: Strategies for and effects of revising life science items. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2007, 44, 864–881, doi:10.1002/tea.20176.
[47]
Lyon, E.G. Learning to assess science in linguistically diverse classrooms: Tracking growth in secondary science preservice teachers’ assessment expertise. Sci. Educ. 2013, 97, 442–467, doi:10.1002/sce.21059.
[48]
Lyon, E.G. What about language while equitably assessing science? Case studies of preservice teachers’ evolving expertise. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2013, 32, 1–11, doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.12.006.
[49]
Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009.
[50]
Corbin, J.M.; Strauss, A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 1990, 13, 3–21, doi:10.1007/BF00988593.
[51]
Guba, E.; Lincoln, Y.S. Fourth Generation Evaluation; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1989.
[52]
Bay High School is a Pseudonym. Available online: http://www.edresults.org (accessed on 14 July 2013).
[53]
A pith ball is a device commonly used in physics labs to test transfer of electric charges. Usually a small, lightweight nonconductive ball, they could then come in contact with electrically charged-materials such as rods or cloths.
[54]
All student names are pseudonyms
[55]
Lee, O.; Santau, A.; Maerten-Rivera, J. Science and Literacy Assessments with English Language Learners. In Cultural Validity in Assessment: Addressing Linguistic and Cultural Diversity; Basterra, M., Trumbull, E., Solano-Flores, G., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 254–274.
[56]
Trumbell, E.; Solano-Flores, G. The Role of Language in Assessment. In Cultural Validity in Assessment: Addressing Linguistic and Cultural Diversity; Basterra, M., Trumbull, E., Solano-Flores, G., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 22–46.
