Gender-Specific Associations between Perceived Neighbourhood Walkability and Meeting Walking Recommendations When Walking for Transport and Recreation for Czech Inhabitants over 50 Years of Age
Few studies have investigated the different effects that the built environment may have on the physical activity behaviours of men and women. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the gender differences in meeting walking recommendations in relation to perceived neighbourhood walkability attributes within the active transportation and leisure-time domains for Czech inhabitants over 50 years of age. The sample included 1,417 men and 1,422 women who were randomly selected. The Abbreviated Neighbourhood Environment Walkability Scale (ANEWS) was used to obtain information about the perceived environment. The self-administered long version of the IPAQ was used to assess physical activity levels. When walking for transport, men living in neighbourhoods with high street connectivity (OR = 1.47, CI = 1.04–2.9) and higher traffic and crime safety (OR = 1.28, CI = 1.02–1.6) and women living in neighbourhoods with high proximity (OR = 1.36, CI = 1.04–1.77) and high neighbourhood aesthetics (OR = 1.36, CI = 1.04–1.76) were more likely to meet recommended levels of walking. No environmental attributes were found to significantly influence the accomplishment of walking recommendations by men or women when walking for leisure. The study results indicate the gender-specific associations between transportation-related walking and the environment factors. The consideration of those factors in the design of gender-specific walking interventions for Czech inhabitants may help the interventions to be more effective in promotion of physical activity.
References
[1]
Sallis, J.F.; Owen, N.; Fisher, E.B. Ecological models of health behavior. In Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4th ed.; Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., Viswanth, K., Eds.; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2008; pp. 465–486.
[2]
Shibata, A.; Oka, K.; Harada, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Muraoka, I. Psychological, social, and environmental factors to meeting physical activity recommendations among Japanese adults. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2009, 6, doi:10.1186/1479-5868-6-60.
[3]
Spence, J.C.; Plotnikoff, R.C.; Rovniak, L.S.; Ginis, K.M.; Rodgers, W.; Lear, S.A. Perceived neighbourhood correlates of walking among participants visiting the Canada on the Move website. Can. J. Public Health 2006, 97, S39–S44.
[4]
Sugiyama, T.; Salmon, J.; Dunstan, D.W.; Bauman, A.E.; Owen, N. Neighborhood walkability and TV viewing time among Australian adults. Amer. J. Prev. Med. 2007, 33, 444–449, doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.035.
[5]
Van Dyck, D.; Cerin, E.; Conway, T.L.; de Bourdeaudhuij, I.; Owen, N.; Kerr, J.; Cardon, G.; Frank, L.D.; Saelens, B.E.; Sallis, J.F. Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes associated with adults transport-related walking and cycling: Findings from the USA, Australia, and Belgium. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2012, 9, doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-70.
[6]
Humpel, N.; Owen, N.; Iverson, D.; Leslie, E.; Bauman, A. Perceived environment attributes, residential location, and walking for particular purposes. Amer. J. Prev. Med. 2004, 26, 119–125, doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2003.10.005.
[7]
Wendel-Vos, W.; Droomers, M.; Kremers, S.; Brug, J.; van Lenthe, F. Potential environmental determinants of physical activity in adults: A systematic review. Obes. Rev. 2007, 8, 425–440.
[8]
Giles-Corti, B.; Timperio, A.; Bull, F.; Pikora, T. Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: Increased specificity for ecological models. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2005, 33, 175–181, doi:10.1097/00003677-200510000-00005.
[9]
Owen, N.; Humpel, N.; Leslie, E.; Bauman, A.; Sallis, J.F. Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda. Amer. J. Prev. Med. 2004, 27, 67–76, doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.006.
[10]
Fr？mel, K.; Mitá？, J.; Kerr, J. The associations between active lifestyle, the size of a community and SES of the adult population in the Czech Republic. Health Place 2009, 15, 447–454, doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.08.003.
[11]
Belza, B.; Walwick, J.; Schwartz, S.; LoGerfo, J.; Shiu-Thornton, S.; Taylor, M. Older Adult Perspectives on Physical Activity and Exercise: Voices from Multiple Cultures. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1277949/#__ffn_sectitle (accessed on 23 December 2013).
[12]
Cerin, E.; Saelens, B.E.; Sallis, J.F.; Frank, L.D. Neighborhood environment walkability scale: Validity and development of a short form. Med. Sci. Sport. Exercise 2006, 38, 1682–1691.
[13]
Craig, C.L.; Marshall, A.L.; Sjostrom, M.; Bauman, A.E.; Booth, M.L.; Ainsworth, B.E.; Pratt, M.; Ekelund, U.; Yngve, A.; Sallis, J.F.; Oja, P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med. Sci. Sport. Exercise 2003, 35, 1381–1395, doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
[14]
International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Cultural Adaptation. Available online: http://www.ipaq.ki.se/cultural.htm (accessed on 27 December 2013).
[15]
Pelclová, J.; Va？í？ková, J.; Fr？mel, K.; Djordjevi？, I. Leisure time, occupational, domestic, and commuting physical activity of inhabitants of the Czech Republic aged 55–69: Influence of socio-demographic and environmental factors. Acta Univ. Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica 2009, 39, 13–20.
[16]
Haskell, W.L.; Lee, I.M.; Pate, R.R.; Powell, K.E.; Blair, S.N.; Franklin, B.A.; Macera, C.A.; Heath, G.W.; Thompson, P.D.; Bauman, A. Physical activity and public health: Updated recommendation for adults from the American college of sports medicine and the American heart association. Circulation 2007, 116, 1081–1093, doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185649.
[17]
Sallis, J.F. Scoring for the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale—Abbreviated (NEWS-A). Available online: http://sallis.ucsd.edu/Documents/Measures_documents/NEWS_A_scoring.pdf (accessed on 23 December 2013).
[18]
McCormack, G.R.; Shiell, A. In search of causality: A systematic review of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity among adults. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2011, 8, doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-125.
[19]
Saelens, B.E.; Handy, S.L. Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Med. Sci. Sport. Exercise 2008, 40, S550–S566, doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4.
[20]
Ball, K.; Jeffery, R.W.; Crawford, D.A.; Roberts, R.J.; Salmon, J.; Timperio, A.F. Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments. Prev. Med. 2008, 47, 294–298, doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.05.001.
[21]
Brownson, R.C.; Hoehner, C.M.; Day, K.; Forsyth, A.; Sallis, J.F. Measuring the built environment for physical activity: State of the science. Amer. J. Prev. Med. 2009, 36, S99–S123, doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.005.
[22]
Hoehner, C.M.; Ramirez, L.K.B.; Elliott, M.B.; Handy, S.L.; Brownson, R.C. Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. Amer. J. Prev. Med. 2005, 28, 105–116.
