全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A Spatially Intelligent Public Participation System for the?Environmental Impact Assessment Process

DOI: 10.3390/ijgi2020480

Keywords: GIS, VGI, public participation, environmental impact assessment

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

An environmental impact assessment (EIA) is a decision-making process that evaluates the possible significant effects that a proposed project may exert on the environment. The EIA scoping and reviewing stages often involve public participation. Although its importance has long been recognized, public participation in the EIA process is often regarded as ineffective, due to time, budget, resource, technical and procedural constraints, as well as the complexity of environmental information. Geographic Information System (GIS) and Volunteer Geographic Information (VGI) have the potential to contribute to data collection, sharing and presentation, utilize local user-generated content to benefit decision-making and increase public outreach. This research integrated GIS, VGI, social media tools, data mining and mobile technology to design a spatially intelligent framework that presented and shared EIA information effectively to the public. A spatially intelligent public participative system (SIPPS) was also developed as a proof-of-concept of the framework. The research selected the Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project (TRTP) as the pilot study area. Survey questionnaires were designed to collect feedback and conduct evaluation. Results show that SIPPS was able to improve the effectiveness of public participation, promote environmental awareness and achieve good system usability.

References

[1]  Del Furia, L.; Wallace-Jones, J. The effectiveness of provisions and quality of practices concerning public participation in EIA in Italy. Environ. Impact Asses. 2000, 20, 457–479.
[2]  Qin, X.; Tao, C. Analysis of Public Constructoin and the Use of Envrionmental Information. In Proceedings of International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering (MACE), Wuhan, China, 26–28 June 2010; pp. 1948–1951.
[3]  Lowndes, V.; Pratchett, L.; Stoker, G. Trends in public participation: Part 1—Local government perspectives. Public Admin. 2001, 79, 205–222, doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00253.
[4]  Gonzalez, A.; Gilmer, A.; Foley, R.; Sweeney, J.; Fry, J. Technology-aided participative methods in environmental assessment: An international perspective. Comput. Environ. Urban 2008, 32, 303–316, doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.02.001.
[5]  Harris, T.; Weiner, D. GIS and Society: The Social Implications of How People, Space, and Environment are Represented in GIS, Available online: www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/Publications/Tech_Reports/96/96–7.PDF (accessed on 13 January 2013).
[6]  Sieber, R. Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2006, 96, 491–507, doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x.
[7]  Al-Kodmany, K. GIS and the Artist: Shaping the Image of a Neighbourhood in Participatory Environmental Design. In Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems, 1st ed.; Craig, W.J., Harris, T.M., Weiner, D., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 320–329.
[8]  Bojórquez-Tapia, L.; Díaz-Mondragón, S.; Ezcurra, E. GIS-based approach for participatory decisionmaking and land suitability assessment. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2001, 15, 129–151, doi:10.1080/13658810010005534.
[9]  Kingston, R.; Carver, S.; Evans, A.; Turton, I. Web-based public participation Geographical Information Systems: An aid to local environmental decision-making. Comput. Environ. Urban 2000, 24, 109–125, doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00049-6.
[10]  Haklay, M.E. Public access to environmental information: Past, present and future. Comput. Environ. Urban 2003, 27, 163–180.
[11]  Stefanidis, A.; Crooks, A.; Radzikowski, J. Harvesting ambient geospatial information from social media feeds. Environ. Manage. 2012, 49, 816–832.
[12]  Yap, L.F.; Bessho, M.; Koshizuka, N.; Sakamura, K. User-Generated Content for Location-Based Services: A Review. In Virtual Communities, Social Networks and Collaboration; Lazakidou, A.A., Ed.; Springer Science: New York, NY, USA, 2012; Volume 15, p. 163.
[13]  Howe, J. The Rise of Crowdsourcing, Available online: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html (accessed on 13 January 2013).
[14]  Brabham, D.C. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases. Int. J. Res. New Media Technol. 2008, 14, 75–90.
[15]  Committee on New Research Directions for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency; Mapping Science Committee; Board on Earth Sciences and Resources; Division on Earth and Life Studies. Workshop on New Research Directions for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; pp. 2–3. Available online: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12964 (accessed on 13 January 2013).
[16]  Goodchild, M.F. NeoGeography and the nature of geographic expertise. J. Locat. Based Serv. 2009, 3, 82–96, doi:10.1080/17489720902950374.
[17]  Nú?ez-Redó, M.; Díaz, L.; Gil, J.; González, D.; Huerta, J. Discovery and Integration of Web 2.0 Content into Geospatial Information Infrastructures: A Use Case in Wild Fire Monitoring. In Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.4/8.9 International Cross Domain Conference on Availability, Reliability, and Security for Business, Enterprise and Health Information Systems, Vienna, Austria, 22–26 August 2011; Tjoa, A.M., Oqirchmayr, G., You, I., Xu, L., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Vienna, Austria, 2011; pp. 50–68.
[18]  Goodchild, M.F. Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. Int. J. Spat. Data Infrastruct. Res. 2007, 2, 24–32.
[19]  Tulloch, D.L. Many Many Maps: Empowerment and Online Participatory Mapping, Available online: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1620/1535 (accessed on 13 January 2013).
[20]  Turner, A.J. Introduction to Neogeography; O’Reilly Media: Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2006; pp. 2–3.
[21]  Flanagin, A.J.; Metzger, M.J. The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 2008, 72, 137–148, doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9188-y.
[22]  Belimpasakis, P.; Saaranen, A. Sharing with people: A system for user-centric content sharing. Multimed. Syst. 2010, 16, 399–421.
[23]  Daz, L.; Granell, C.; Gould, M.; Huerta, J. Managing user-generated information in geospatial cyber infrastructures. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2011, 27, 304–314, doi:10.1016/j.future.2010.09.002.
[24]  Creighton, J. The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions through Citizen Involvement, 1st ed. ed.; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2005; p. 244.
[25]  Ho, S.; Rajabifard, A. Learning from the Crowd: The Role of Volunteered Geographic Information in Realising a Spatially Enabled Society. In Proceedings of GSDI 12 World Conference—Realising Spatially Enabled Societies, Singapore, 19–22 October 2010.
[26]  Werts, J.D.; Mikhailova, E.A.; Post, C.J.; Sharp, J.L. An integrated WebGIS framework for volunteered geographic information and social media in soil and water conservation. Environ. Manage. 2012, 49, 816–832, doi:10.1007/s00267-012-9818-5.
[27]  Danielsen, F.; Burgess, N.D.; Jensen, P.M.; Pirhofer-Walzl, K. Environmental monitoring: The scale and speed of implementation varies according to the degree of peoples involvement. J. App. Ecol. 2010, 47, 1166–1168, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01874.x.
[28]  Seeger, C.J. The role of facilitated volunteered geographic information in the landscape planning and site design process. GeoJournal 2008, 72, 199–213, doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9184-2.
[29]  Kelly, M.; Tuxen, K.; Kearns, F. Geospatial informatics for management of a new forest disease: Sudden oak death. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 2004, 70, 1001–1004.
[30]  Eick, C.; Vaezian, B.; Jiang, D.; Wang, J. Discovery of Interesting Regions in Spatial Datasets Using Supervised Clustering. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Berlin, Germany, 18–22 September 2006; pp. 127–138.
[31]  Rzhetsky, A.; Seringhaus, M.; Gerstein, M.B. Getting started in text mining: Part two. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5, doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000411.
[32]  Maue, P.; Schade, S. Data integration in the geospatial semantic web. J. Cases Inf. Technol. 2009, 11, 100–122, doi:10.4018/jcit.2009072105.
[33]  Gao, L.; Chang, E.; Han, S. Powerful tool to expand business intelligence: Text mining. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2005, 8, 110–115.
[34]  Glasson, J.; Therivel, R.; Chadwick, A. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, 3rd ed. ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2005; p. 127.
[35]  Bishop, P.; Davis, G. Mapping public participation in policy choices. Aust. J. Publ. Admin. 2006, 61, 14–29.
[36]  Pring, G.; Noe, S.Y. The Emerging International Law of Public Participation Affecting Global Mining, Energy and Resource Development. In Human Rights in Natural Resource Development: Public Participation in the Sustainable Development of Mining and Energy Resources, 1st ed.; Zillman, D.M., Lucas, A., Pring, G., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 11–76.
[37]  De Steiguer, J.E. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Multi-Criteria Decision Models for Improving Public Participation. Accession No. 0194153, Available online: http://www.reeis.usda.gov/web/crisprojectpages/194153.html (accessed on 29 July 2012).
[38]  Pischke, F.; Cashmore, M. Decision-oriented environmental assessment: An empirical study of its theory and methods. Environ. Impact Asses. 2006, 26, 643–662, doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2006.06.004.
[39]  Bangor, A.; Kortum, P.T.; Miller, J.A. An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale (SUS). Int. J. Human-Comput. Interact. 2008, 24, 574–594, doi:10.1080/10447310802205776.
[40]  Cutter, S.L.; Mitchell, J.T.; Scott, M.S. Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Ann. Assn. Amer. Geogr. 2000, 90, 713–737, doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00219.
[41]  Gouveia, C.; Fonseca, A. New approaches to environmental monitoring: The use of ICT to explore volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 2008, 72, 185–197, doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9183-3.
[42]  Elwood, S. Volunteered geographic information key questions, concepts and methods to guide emerging research and practice. GeoJournal 2008, 72, 133–135, doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9187-z.
[43]  Schade, S.; Díaz, L.; Ostermann, F.; Spinsanti, L.; Luraschi, G.; Cox, S.; Nu?ez, M.; de Longueville, B. Citizen-based sensing of crisis events: Sensor web enablement for volunteered geographic information. Appl. Geomat. 2011, 5, 3–18.
[44]  Yanenko, O.; Schilieder, C. Enhancing the Quality of Volunteered Geographic Information: A Constraint-Based Approach. In Bridging the Geographic Information Sciences; Gensel, J., Josselin, D., Vandenbroucke, D., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 429–446.
[45]  Bishr, M.; Mantelas, L. A trust and reputation model for filtering and classifying knowledge about urban growth. GeoJournal 2008, 72, 229–237, doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9182-4.
[46]  Mummidi, L.; Krumm, J. Discovering points of interest from users’ map annotations. GeoJournal 2008, 72, 215–227, doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9181-5.
[47]  Lee, V. Volunteer Monitoring: A Brief History, Available online: http://water.epa.gov/type/rsl/monitoring/upload/2004_10_13_monitoring_volunteer_newsletter_volmon06no1.pdf (accessed on 2 April 2013).
[48]  De Longueville, B.; Annoni, A.; Schade, S.; Ostl?nder, N.; Whitmore, C. Digital Earth’s nervous system for crisis events: Real-time sensor web enablement of Volunteered Geographic Information. Int. J. Digital Earth 2010, 3, 242–259.
[49]  Girres, J.-F.; Touya, G. Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Trans. GIS 2010, 14, 435–459, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01203.x.
[50]  Connors, J.P.; Lei, S.; Kelly, M. Citizen science in the age of Neogeography: Utilizing volunteered geographic information for environmental monitoring. Ann. Assn. Amer. Geogr. 2012, 102, 1267–1289, doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.627058.
[51]  O’Faircheallaigh, C. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purpose, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environ. Impact Asses. 2010, 30, 19–27, doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001.
[52]  Oden, M.D.; Lentz, R.G. Digital divide or digital opportunity in the Mississippi delta region of the US. Telecommun. Policy 2001, 25, 291–313, doi:10.1016/S0308-5961(01)00006-4.

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133