Multipurpose mosaic (“ecoagriculture”) landscapes can serve the purpose of land sharing to combine objectives of agricultural production and biodiversity conservation. Rewarding the people who shape and maintain those landscapes could act as a mechanism to generate added-value representing an indirect payment for ecosystem services. We investigated the feasibility of such an approach in two areas in Southern Africa differing in spatial configurations, history and socio-economic context. We designed and tested a composite index describing the state of each landscape in terms of ecoagriculture criteria (conservation, production, institutions and livelihood) and ecosystem services (provisioning, regulating and cultural services). The resulting index is made up of different sets of data each comprising 40 scores, obtained from stakeholders’ participatory interviews. Ecosystem services are in general assigned more importance than ecoagriculture criteria. In both cases, cultural services receive the highest scores, whereas the lowest ones are attributed to the livelihood and institutions in the Zimbabwean and South African sites, respectively. Index values reveal that the South African site, where there is more integration between land-use units, does better in terms of a landscape performing multiple functions. Provided relevant stakeholders are involved and a certification mechanism is developed, the landscape labelling index can be used to recognize and reward the value of outstanding rural landscapes.
References
[1]
Grau, R.; Kuemmerle, T.; Macchi, L. Beyond “land sparing versus land sharing”: Environmental heterogeneity, globalization and the balance between agricultural production and nature conservation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2013, 5, 477–483, doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.001.
[2]
Robson, J.P. Local approaches to biodiversity conservation: Lessons from Oaxaca, Southern Mexico. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2007, 10, 267–286.
[3]
Farming with Nature: The Science and Practice of Ecoagriculture; Scherr, S.J., Mc Neely., J.A., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; p. 445.
[4]
Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. In Ecosystems & Human Well-Being: Synthesis; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
[5]
Fischer, J.; Brosi, B.; Daily, G.C.; Ehrlich, P.R.; Goldman, R.; Goldstein, J.; Tallis, H. Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6, 380–385.
[6]
Caron, P. à quels territoires s’intéressent les agronomes? Le point de vue d’un géographe tropicaliste. Nat. Sci. Soc. 2005, 13, 145–153, doi:10.1051/nss:2005021.
[7]
Wu, J. Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landsc. Ecol. 2013, 28, 999–1023, doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9.
[8]
Peng, J.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Jing, J.; Ye, M. The contribution of landscape ecology to sustainable land use research. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2011, 13, 953, doi:10.1007/s10668-007-9113-4.
[9]
Sayer, J.; Sunderland, T.; Ghazoul, J.; Pfund, J.L.; Sheil, D.; Meijaard, E.; Ventera, M.; Boedhihartono, A.K.; Day, M.; Garcia, C.; et al. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation and other competing land uses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 8349–8356.
[10]
Yaap, B.; Campbell, B.M. Part3-16. Assessing Design of Integrated Conservation and Development Projects. In Evidence-Based Conservation: Lessons from the Lower Mekong; Sunderland, T.C.H., Sayer, J.A., Hoang, M.H., Eds.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2012; p. 227.
[11]
Buck, L.; Milder, J.; Gavin, T.; Mukherjee, I. Understanding Ecoagriculture: A framework for Measuring Landscape Performance. Discussion Paper; Ecoagriculture Partners: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
[12]
Scherr, S.J.; McNeely, J.A. Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: Towards a new paradigm of “ecoagriculture” landscapes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 2008, 363, 477–494, doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2165.
[13]
Convention on Biological Diversity. Available online: http://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/ (accessed on 12 September 2013).
[14]
Ghazoul, J.; Garcia, C.; Kushalappa, C.G. Landscape labelling: A concept for next-generation payment for ecosystem service schemes. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 258, 1889–1895, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.038.
[15]
Engel, S.; Pagiola, S.; Wunder, S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65, 663–674, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011.
[16]
Wunder, S. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper; CIFOR: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2005; p. 32.
[17]
Wunder, S. Payments for environmental services and the poor: Concepts and preliminary evidence. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2008, 13, 279–297, doi:10.1017/S1355770X08004282.
[18]
Karsenty, A. La forêt tropicale, le Mécanisme REDD et les Paiements Pour Services Environnementaux: Un Casse-Tête Ecologique et Socio-Economique. Available online: http://www.sfecologie.org/regards/2011/02/21/regards-r12-karsenty/ (accessed on 12 September 2013).
[19]
Pagiola, S.; Arcenas, A.; Platais, G. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Dev. 2005, 33, 237–253, doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011.
[20]
Taylor, P.L. In the market but not of it: Fair trade coffee and forest Stewardship Council Certification as market-based social change. World Dev. 2005, 33, 129–147, doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.007.
[21]
Peace Parks Foundation: The Global Solution. Available online: http://www.peaceparks.org/index.php?pid=100&mid=1 (accessed on 10 July 2013).
[22]
Mucina, L.; Rutherford, M.C. The Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2006; p. 807.
[23]
Torquebiau, E.; Dosso, M.; Nakaggwa, F.; Philippon, O. Biodiversity conservation through farming: A landscape assessment in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J. Sustain. Agric. 2012, 36, 296–318, doi:10.1080/10440046.2011.620227.
[24]
Mupamhadzi, I.T.; Matema, C.; Muvengwi, J. Observations and Informal Findings on Wild Meat Trade: Socio-Economic Research with Local Communities in and around the Save Valley Conservancy, Zimbabwe; PARSEL Project: Harare, Zimbabwe, 2009.
[25]
de Groot, R.S.; Wilson, M.A.; Boumans, R.M. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41, 393–408, doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7.
[26]
Measuring Livelihoods and Environmental Dependence: Methods for Research and Fieldwork; Angelsen, A., Larsen, H.O., Lund, J., Smith-Hall, C., Wunder, S., Eds.; Earthscan/CIFOR: London, UK/Bogor, Indonesia, 2011; p. 263.
[27]
Milder, J.C.; Hart, A.K.; Dobie, P.; Minai, J.; Zaleski, C. Integrated landscape initiatives for african agriculture, development, and conservation: A region-wide assessment. World Dev. 2014, 54, 68–80, doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.006.
[28]
Chitakira, M.; Torquebiau, E.; Ferguson, W. Community visioning in a transfrontier conservation area in southern Africa paves the way towards landscapes combining agricultural production and biodiversity conservation. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2012, 55, 1228–1247, doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.640149.
[29]
Chitakira, M. Factors Affecting Ecoagriculture for Integrated Farming and Biodiversity Conservation in a Transfrontier Conservation Area in Southern Africa. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2013.
[30]
Biénabe, E. Quelles Transformations Techniques, Sociales et Institutionnelles Pour des Systèmes Agricoles Biodivers? In Cultiver la Biodiversité Pour Transformer L’Agriculture; Hainzelin, E., Ed.; QUAE: Versailles, France, 2013; pp. 223–262.
[31]
Gumede, B. Feasibility Study for the Development of Usuthu Gorge Adventure Tourism Facilities, (First Draft); Municipality of Jozini: Jozini, South Africa, 2010. unpublished.
[32]
Pfund, J.L. Landscape-scale research for conservation and development in the tropics: Fighting persisting challenges. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2010, 2, 117–126.
[33]
Cousins, B.; Scoones, I. Contested paradigms of “viability” in redistributive land reform: Perspectives from Southern Africa. J. Peasant Stud. 2010, 37, 31–66.
[34]
Kepe, T.; Tessaro, D. Trading-off: Rural food security and land rights in South Africa. Land Use Policy 2014, 36, 267–274, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.013.
[35]
Harvey, C.A.; Chacón, M.; Donatti, C.I.; Garen, E.; Hannah, L.; Andrade, A.; Bedege, L.; Brown, D.; Calle, A.; Chará, J.; et al. Climate-smart landscapes: Opportunities and challenges for integrating adaptation and mitigation in tropical agriculture. Conserv. Lett. 2013, doi:10.1111/conl.12066.
