Medicago sativa, alfalfa or lucerne, and M. arborea were considered reproductively isolated until recently. Then, in 2003, an alfalfa genotype was identified that produced a few seeds and progeny with hybrid traits after a large number of pollinations by M. arborea. A derivative of this alfalfa genotype also produced a low frequency of progeny with hybrid traits. Thus, the hybridization barrier was weakened by selection of seed parents. Hybrids from both events expressed traits from M. arborea and M. arborea-specific DNA bands, although more of the M. sativa genome was retained, based on the DNA results. Thus, there was chromatin elimination during embryogenesis, resulting in partial hybrids (hereafter hybrids). However, more than 30 hybrids with an array of M. arborea traits have been obtained thus far, and research continues on the nature of the hybrids. Traits have been genetically transmitted in crosses, and selected traits are in use for alfalfa breeding. This paper reviews the first hybrids and then focuses on further weakening of the hybridization barrier with the discovery of a more efficient hybridizer derived from crossing Medicago sativa subspecies, sativa, coerulea and falcata. This genotype was found to have reproductive abnormalities associated with its complex subspecies origin that are best described as hybrid breakdown. In effect, this subspecies derivative is a bridge-cross parent that consistently produces hybrids. Reproductive abnormalities in the bridge-cross parent are reported and discussed.
References
[1]
Lefi, E.; Conesa, M.A.; Cifre, J.; Gulias, J.; Medrano, H. Dry matter allocation in Medicago arborea and Medicago citrina in response to drought and defoliation. Crop Pasture Sci. 2012, 63, 179–189.
[2]
McCoy, T.; Bingham, E. Cytology and Cytogenetics of Alfalfa. In Alfalfa and Alfalfa Improvement; Hanson, A.A., Barnes, D.K., Hill, R.R., Jr., Eds.; American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1988; pp. 737–776.
[3]
Small, E.; Jomphe, M. A synopsis of the genus Medicago. Can. J. Bot. 1989, 67, 3260–3294, doi:10.1139/b89-405.
[4]
Steele, K.P.; Ickert-Bond, S.M.; Zarre, S.; Wojciechowski, M.F. Phylogeny and character evolution in Medicago (Leguminosae): Evidence from analyses of plastid trnK/matK and nuclear GA30x1 sequences. Am. J. Bot. 2010, 97, 1142–1155.
[5]
Fredrickson, S.; Bolton, J.L. Development of the embryo of Medicago sativa L. after normal fertilization and after pollination by other species of Medicago. Can. J. Bot. 1963, 41, 23–33, doi:10.1139/b63-003.
[6]
McCoy, T.J.; Echt, C.S. Potential of trispecies bridge crosses and random amplified polymorphic DNA markers for introgression of Medicago daghestanica and M. pironae germplasm into alfalfa (M. sativa). Genome 1993, 36, 594–601, doi:10.1139/g93-080.
[7]
Nenz, E.; Pupilli, F.; Damiani, F.; Arcioni, S. Somatic hybrid plants between the forage legumes Medicago sativa L. and M. arborea L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1996, 93, 183–189, doi:10.1007/BF00225744.
[8]
Bingham, E.T. Medicago arborea project at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Medicago Genet. Rep. 2005, 5, 1–6.
[9]
Armour, D.J.; Mackie, J.M.; Musial, J.M.; Irwin, J.A.G. Transfer of anthracnose resistance and pod coiling traits from Medicago arborea to M. sativa by sexual reproduction. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 117, 149–156, doi:10.1007/s00122-008-0761-z.
[10]
Irwin, J.A.G.; Armour, D.J.; Pepper, P.M.; Lowe, K.F. Heterosis in lucerne testcrosses with Medicago arborea introgressions and Omani landraces and their performance in synthetics. Crop Pasture Sci. 2010, 61, 450–463.
[11]
Bingham, E.; Armour, D.; Irwin, J.; Jayaraman, D.; Ane, J.-M. Report on progress hybridizing herbaceous Medicago sativa and woody M. arborea. Medicago Genet. Rep. 2009, 9, 1–25.
[12]
Selected references using 6-4ms alfalfa in research. Medicago Genet. Rep. 2010, 10, 1–2.
[13]
Baker, K.F. The UC system for producing healthy container-grown plants. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. 1957, 23, 73.
[14]
Vroh Bi, I.; Baudoin, J.P.; Hau, B.; Mergeai, G. Development of high-gossypol cotton plants with low-gossypol seeds using trispecies bridge crosses and in vitro culture of seed embryos. Euphytica 1999, 106, 243–251, doi:10.1023/A:1003539924238.
[15]
Zhang, Q.; Yu, E.; Medina, A. Development of advanced interspecific bridge lines among Cucurbita. pepo, C. maxima, and C. moschata. HortScience 2012, 47, 452–458.
[16]
Wang, Y.; Scarth, R.; Campell, C. Interspecific hybridization between Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn. and F. esculentum Moench. Fagopyrum 2002, 19, 31–35.
[17]
Orr, H.A.; Coyne, J.A. The genetics of postzygotic isolation in the Drosophilia virilis group. Genetics 1989, 121, 527–537.
[18]
Bingham, E. Wide crosses in plants where results are similar to Medicago sativa × M.arborea crosses. Medicago Genet. Rep. 2009, 9, 1–4.
[19]
McClintock, B. The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 1984, 226, 792–801.
[20]
Carman, J.G. Methods for Producing Apomictic Plants. US Patent 6750376, 15 June 2004.
[21]
Etterson, J.R.; Keller, S.R.; Galloway, L.F. Epistatic and cytonuclear interactions govern outbreeding depression in autopolyploids. Evolution 2007, 61, 2671–2683, doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00234.x.
