Raised public concern in the European Union (EU) about the legality of its timber imports has pushed the European Commission to raise its standards and legality demands for wood imports. Combining literature reviews, structured interviews and trade data analyses, this study assesses the potential influence from Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade (FLEGT) (with its Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPA) system and new legislation EU Timber Regulation (EUTR)), and third party verification schemes on the timber trade between tropical countries and Europe. These instruments have the potential to reduce the amount of illegally sourced timber being placed on the market, and they seem to have resulted in both increasing support of legality verification and certification uptake. However, there are signs of increased ambiguity in trade that could originate as a side effect of the transition towards a stricter regulation for tropical timber. Such ambiguity is explicitly taken into account here. Possible consequences from increased ambiguity are substitution of oak lumber for tropical hardwood lumber, and a diversion of exports of tropical timber to destinations with a less stringent regulatory framework than the EU. Evidence of these trade patterns in the literature reviews, interviews, and trade data analyses seems to confirm that ambiguity in international trade markets has actually increased since the introduction of these instruments.
References
[1]
Eba’a Atyi, R.; Assembe-Mvondo, S.; Lescuyer, G.; Cerruti, P. Impacts of international timber procurement policies on Central Africa’s forestry sector. The case of Cameroon. For. Policy Econ. 2013, 32, 40–48, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.12.006.
[2]
Li, R.; Buongiorno, J.; Turner, J.A.; Zhu, S.; Prestemon, J. Long-term effects of eliminating illegal logging on the world forest industries, trade, and inventory. For. Policy Econ. 2008, 10, 480–490, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2008.04.003.
[3]
Moiseyev, A.; Solberg, B.; Michie, B.; Kallio, I.; Maarit, A. Modeling the impacts of policy measures to prevent import of illegal wood and wood products. For. Policy Econ. 2010, 12, 24–30, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2009.09.015.
[4]
Luttrell, C.; Obidzinski, K.; Brockhaus, M.; Muharrom, E.; Petkova, E.; Wardell, A.; Halperin, J. Lessons for REDD + from Measures to Control Illegal Logging in Indonesia. Working paper 74; United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Center for International Forestry Research: Jakarta and Bogor, Indonesia, 2011; p. 76.
[5]
Sann, K.; Thornber, K. Global Project: Impact Assessment of Forest Products Trade in the Promotion of Sustainable Forest Management. Impact of Market-Based Instruments and Initiatives on the Trade in Forest Products and Sustainable Forest Management. (GCP/INT/775/JPN); LTS International Ltd.: Edinburgh, UK, 2003. Available online: http://foris.fao.org/static/data/ trade/pdf/lts.pdf (Accessed on 21 April 2013).
[6]
Support Study for Development of the Non-Legislative Acts Provided for the Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying down the Obligations of Operators Who Place Timber and Timber Products on the Market; European Forest Institute: Joesuu, Finland, 2011. Available online: http://www.illegal logging.info/uploads/eutrfinalreport.pdf (Accessed on 5 February 2013).
[7]
Forest Products Annual Market Review 2010–2011; Geneva Timber and Forest Study Paper #20123064737; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
[8]
PEFC. Facts & Figures. Available online: http://www.pefc.org/about-pefc/who-we-are/facts-a-figures (Accessed on 20 February 2013).
[9]
FSC. Facts & Figures. Available online: https://ic.fsc.org/facts-figures.19.htm (Accessed on 2 September 2013).
[10]
Cashore, B.; Stone, M.V. Can legality verification rescue global forest governance? Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia. Forest Policy Econ. 2012, 18, 13–22, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.005.
[11]
Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament–Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade (FLEGT)–Proposal for an EU Action Plan; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2003.
[12]
Van Heeswijk, L.; Turnhout, E. The discursive structure of FLEGT (Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade): The negotiation and interpretation of legality in the EU and Indonesia. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 32, 6–13, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.10.009.
[13]
Carden, C.; Wijers, R.; Zambon, P. FLEGT, VPA, EUTR and Their Possible Impact on the Bolivian Timber Sector; CBI Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands: Bolivia, 2012. Available online: http://www.cbi.eu/system/files/marketintel/FINAL_REPORT_CBI_BOL_Eng. pdf (Accessed on 6 February 2013).
[14]
Tropical Timber Market Report. International Tropical Timber Organization, 16th–31st May 2013; 16th–31st May 2013, Volume 17. No. 10. Available online: http://www.itto.int/mis_download/ (Accessed on 3 June 2013).
[15]
Annual Review and Assessment of the World Timber Situation 2011; International Tropical Timber Organization, Division of Economic Information and Market Intelligence: Yokohama, Japan, 2011.
[16]
Tropical Timber Market Report. International Tropical Timber Organization, 16th–31st January 2013; 16th–31st January 2013, Volume 17. No. 2. Available online: http://www.itto.int/mis_download/ (Accessed on 1 February 2013).
[17]
We assume that both agents would prefer to trade with each other rather than with the alternative partners.
[18]
Without loss of generality, we assume that E[c] is simply the mean between c* and c*.
[19]
Knight, F.H. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit; Hart, Schaffner & Marx: Boston, MA, USA, 1921; p. 315.
[20]
Camerer, C.; Weber, M. Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and Ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty. 1992, 5, 235–370.
[21]
Ellsberg, D. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q. J. Econ. 1961, 75, 643–669, doi:10.2307/1884324.
[22]
Etner, J.; Jeleva, M.; Tallon, J.M. Decision theory under uncertainty. Doc. de Travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne 2009, 64, 2–48.
[23]
Schmeidler, D. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 1989, 57, 571–587, doi:10.2307/1911053.
[24]
Dow, J.; Werlang, S.R. Uncertainty aversion, risk aversion, and the optimal choice of Portfolio. Econometrica 1992, 60, 197–204, doi:10.2307/2951685.
[25]
UN COMTRADE. Trade Statistics Database. Available online: http://comtrade.un.org/db/mr/rfCommoditiesList.aspx?px=H1&cc=4407 (Accessed on 12 February 2013).
[26]
World Bank. Available online: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ (Accessed on 18 February 2013).
[27]
Buongiorno, J. Long-term forecasting of major forest products consumption in developed and developing economies. For. Sci. 1977, 23, 13–25.
[28]
Buongiorno, J. Income and price elasticities in the world demand for paper and paperboard. For. Sci. 1978, 24, 231–246.
[29]
Yin, K. Case Study Research; Sage: Beverly Hills, CA, USA, 1984; p. 160.
[30]
Eisenhardt, K.M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1989, 14, 532–550.
[31]
Ragin, C. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1987; p. 185.
[32]
Glaser, B.G.; Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research; Aldine Publishing Co.: Chicago, IL, USA, 1967.
[33]
Durst, P.; McKenzie, P.J.; Brown, C.L.; Appanah, S. Challenges facing certification and eco-labeling of forest products in developing countries. Int. For. Rev. 2006, 8, 193–200.
[34]
Lawson, S.; MacFaul, L. Illegal Logging and Related Trade Indicators of the Global Response; Chatman House: London, UK, 2010. Available online: http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/ default/files/public/Research/Energy,%20Environment%20and%20Development/0710pr_illegallogging.pdf (Accessed on 13 March 2013).
[35]
Status of Tropical Forest Management 2011; International Tropical Timber Organization: Yokohama, Japan, 2011.
[36]
Meyfroidt, P.; Rudel, T.K.; Lambin, E.F. Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 20917–20922, doi:10.1073/pnas.1014773107.
[37]
Hapla, F.; Mohr, E. Identification and Description of Selected Tropical Timbers. Unpublished manuscript.
[38]
Schwarze, R.; Niles, J.O.; Olander, J. Understanding and managing leakage in forest-based greenhouse-gas-mitigations projects. Philos. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 2002, 360, 1685–1703, doi:10.1098/rsta.2002.1040.
[39]
Jonsson, R.; Mbongo, W.; Felton, A.; Boman, M. Leakage Implications for European Timber Markets from Reducing Deforestation in Developing Countries. Forests 2012, 3, 736–744, doi:10.3390/f3030736.
[40]
A Disharmonious Trade. China and the Continued Destruction of Burma’s Northern Frontier Forests. Global Witness, 2009. Available online: http://www.globalwitness.org/library/disharmonious-trade-china-and-continued-destruction-burmas-northern-frontier-forests (Accessed on 20 May 2013).
[41]
European Commission. Timber regulation. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/forests/timber_regulation.htm#products (Accessed on 2 September 2013).
