With the current complexity of issues facing forest and land management, the implementation of the REDD+ initiative comes with significant risks, including conflict. While the exact nature and shape of conflict in REDD+ implementation is difficult to pinpoint, this study aims to build a preliminary predictive framework to identify possible sources of impairment that may result in conflict over management of forests and natural resources. The framework was developed from an extensive literature review and was tested in three REDD+ pilot project sites in Nepal. The results indicate that most of the sources of impairment are present in all study sites, particularly issues relating to benefit sharing, which have been main drivers of conflict prior to REDD+. While we found that the application of the framework has been useful in the Nepalese context, there are some limitations in its scope and precision. Nonetheless, this study points to important implications with regards to REDD+ implementation and conflict management that can be useful for policy makers and practitioners involved in REDD+ strategy designs, as well as other areas of forest management involving outsiders and communities.
References
[1]
Brown, D.; Seymour, F.; Peskett, L. How do we achieve redd co-benefits and avoid doing harm? In Moving Ahead with Redd: Issues, Options and Implications; Angelsen, A., Ed.; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2008; pp. 107–118.
[2]
Knox, A.; Caron, C.; Miner, J.; Goldstein, A. Land tenure and payment for environmental services: Challenges and opportunities for REDD+. Land Tenure J. 2011, 2, 17–55.
[3]
Venter, O.; Koh, L.P. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): Game changer or just another quick fix? Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2012, 1249, 137–150, doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06306.x.
[4]
Phelps, J.; Webb, E.L.; Agrawal, A. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science 2010, 328, 312–313, doi:10.1126/science.1187774.
[5]
Yasmi, Y.; Kelley, L.; Murdiyarso, D.; Patel, T. The struggle over Asia's forests: An overview of forest conflict and potential implications for REDD+. Int. For. Rev. 2012, 14, 1–11.
[6]
Peskett, K.; Huberman, D.; Bowen-Jones, E.; Edwards, G. Making REDD Work for the Poor; Overseas Development Institute and IUCN: London, UK, 2008.
[7]
Cotula, L.; Mayers, J. Tenure in REDD–Start-Point or Afterthought? Natural Resource Issue No. 15; International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED): London, UK, 2009.
[8]
Mola-Yudego, B.; Gritten, D. Determining forest conflict hotspots according to academic and environmental groups. For. Policy Econ. 2010, 12, 575–580, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.004.
[9]
De Jong, W.; Donovan, D.; Abe, K. Extreme Conflict and Tropical Forests. World Forest Volume V; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007.
[10]
Gritten, D.; Saastamoinen, O.; Sajama, S. Ethical analysis: A structured approach to facilitate the resolution of forest conflicts. For. Policy Econ. 2009, 11, 555–560, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2009.07.003.
[11]
Glasl, F. Confronting Conflict: A First-Aid Kit for Handling Conflict; Hawthorne: Gloucestershire, UK, 1999.
[12]
Yasmi, Y.; Colfer, C.J.P. Forestry and fishery conflict in Danau Sentarum: Application of an impairment approach. Borneo Res. Bull. 2010, 41, 145–161.
[13]
Asia Network for Sustainable Agriculture and Bioresources (ANSAB). Forest Carbon Stock of Community Forests in Three Watersheds (Ludikhola, Kayarkhola and Charnawati). Available online: http://www.ansab.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/REDD-CStcok-Year-One-Report.pdf (accessed on 13 August 2012).
[14]
Robson, C. Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2002.
[15]
Cassell, C. Template Analysis. In The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research; Thorpe, R., Holt, R., Eds.; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2008; pp. 221–223.
[16]
Adams, W.; Aveling, R.; Brockington, D.; Dickson, B.; Elliott, J.; Hutton, J.; Roe, D.; Vira, B.; Wolmer, W. Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 2004, 306, 1146–1149, doi:10.1126/science.1097920.
[17]
Hotte, L. Conflicts over property rights and natural-resource exploitation at the frontier. J. Dev. Econ. 2001, 66, 1–21, doi:10.1016/S0304-3878(01)00153-5.
[18]
Engel, A.; Korf, B. Negotiations and Mediation Techniques for Natural Resource Management; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2005.
[19]
Understanding Tenure in South and Southeast Asia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2006.
[20]
Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990.
[21]
Pagiola, S.; Bosquet, B. Estimating the Costs of REDD at the Country Level; World Bank: New York, NY, USA, 2009.
[22]
Conflict and Natural Resource Management. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2000.
[23]
McDermott, M.H.; Schreckenberg, K. Equity in community forestry: Insights from North and South. Int. For. Rev. 2009, 11, 157–170.
[24]
Castro, A.P.; Nielsen, E. Indigenous people and co-management: Implications for conflict management. Environ. Sci. Policy 2001, 4, 229–239, doi:10.1016/S1462-9011(01)00022-3.
[25]
Colchester, M. Free, Prior and Informed Consent: Making FPIC Work for Forests and Peoples; The Forest Dialogue: New Haven, CT, USA, 2010.
[26]
Maxwell, J.W.; Reuveny, R. Resource scarcity and conflict in developing countries. J. Peace Res. 2000, 37, 301–322, doi:10.1177/0022343300037003002.
[27]
De Koning, R.; Capistrano, D.; Yasmi, Y. The Role of Forest Tenure and Governance in Addressing the Global Challenge of Reducing Violent Conflict in Forest Countries; CIFOR and RRI: Bogor, Indonesia, 2007.
[28]
Sunderlin, W.; Hatcher, J.; Liddle, M. From Exclusion to Ownership? Challenges and Opportunities in Advancing Forest Tenure Reform; Rights and Resources Initiative: Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
[29]
Kanel, K.R.; Acharya, D. Re-inventing Forestry Agencies: Institutional Innovation to Support Community Forestry in Nepal. In Reinventing Forestry Agencies: Experiences of Institutional Restructuring in Asia and the Pacific; Durst, P., Brown, C., Broadhead, J., Suzuki, R., Leslie, R., Inoguchi, A., Eds.; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Bangkok, Thailand, 2008.
[30]
International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD). Pilot Forest Carbon Trust Fund: Rewarding Local Communities for Forest Conservation. Available online: http://books.icimod.org/uploads/tmp/icimod-pilot_forest_carbon_trust_fund_.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2012).
[31]
Dahal, G.R. Proposed Forest Act Amendment could Derail Community Forestry in Nepal. 2012. Available online: https://recoftc.wordpress.com/2012/02/07/proposed-forest-act-amendment-could-derail-community-forestry-in-nepal/ (accessed on 24 January 2013).
[32]
Dahal, G.R.; Banskota, K. Cultivating REDD in Nepal’s Community Forestry: A discourse for capitalizing on potential? J. For. Livelihood 2009, 8, 41–50.
[33]
Sunam, R.K. Forest Act Amendment: A Regressive Move in Nepal’s Community Forestry. Available online: http://www.forestrynepal.org/article/1903/4824 (accessed on 10 January 2013).
[34]
Community Forestry REDD+ Project Nepal. Operational Guidelines of Forest Carbon Trust Fund. Available online: http://communityredd.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/REDD-FCTF-Operational-Guidelines-English.pdf (accessed on 10 November 2012).
[35]
Khatri, D.B.; Paudel, N.S.; Bista, R.; Bhandari, K. REDD+ Financing: What Can We Learn from the Piloting of Forest Carbon Trust Fund in Nepal?; Forest Action: Lalitpur, Nepal, 2013.
[36]
Khatri, D.B.; Karki, R.; Bushley, B. REDD+ Payments and Benefit-Sharing Mechanisms in Nepal; Forest Action: Lalitpur, Nepal, 2010.
[37]
Ojha, H.R.; Cameron, J.; Kumar, C. Deliberation or symbolic violence? The governance of community forestry in Nepal. For. Policy Econ. 2009, 5–6, 365–374, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2008.11.003.
[38]
Gurung, A.; Bista, R.; Karki, R.; Shrestha, S.; Uprety, D.; Oh, S.-E. Community-based forest management and its role in improving forest conditions in Nepal. Small Scale For. 2012, August, 1–12.
[39]
Carter, J.; Pokharel, B.; Parajuli, R.R. Two Decades of Community Forestry in Nepal: What Have We Learned?; Nepal Swiss Community Forestry Project: Lalitpur, Nepal, 2011.
[40]
Bushley, B.R.; Khatri, D.B. REDD+: Reversing, Reinforcing or Reconfiguring Decentralized Forest Governance in Nepal? In Proceedings of the 2nd UNITAR’-Yale Conference on Environmental Governance and Democracy, New Haven, CT, USA, 17–19 September 2010.
[41]
Yasmi, Y.; Kelley, L.; Enters, T. Conflict over Forests and Land in Asia: Impacts, Causes, and Management; RECOFTC: Bangkok, Thailand, 2010.
[42]
Watson, A.E.; Niccolucci, M.J. The nature of conflict between hikers and recreational stock users in the John Muir Wilderness. J. Leisure Res. 1994, 26, 372.
[43]
Gritten, D.; Mola-Yudego, B.; Delgado-Matas, C. Media coverage of forest conflicts: A reflection of the conflicts’ intensity and impact? Scand. J. For. Res. 2012, 27, 143–153, doi:10.1080/02827581.2011.635074.
[44]
Wall, J.A.; Callister, R.R. Conflict and its management. J. Manag. 1995, 21, 515–558, doi:10.1177/014920639502100306.
[45]
Bushley, B.; Khanal, D. Selling the Carbon Commons: Decentralization, Commercialization, Forest Tenure and Carbon Trading in Nepal’s Community Forestry. In Lessons about Land Tenure, Forest Governance and REDD: Case Studies from Africa, Asia and Latin America; Naughton-Treves, L., Day, C., Eds.; UW-Madison Land Tenure Center: Madison, WI, USA, 2012.
[46]
Angelsen, A.; Brockhaus, M.; Kanninen, M.; Sills, E.; Sunderlin, W.D.; Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2009.
[47]
Lyster, R. REDD+, transparency, participation and resource rights: The role of law. Environ. Sci. Policy 2011, 14, 118–126, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.008.
[48]
McDougall, C.; Ojha, H.; Pandey, R.K.; Banjade, M.R.; Pandit, B.H. Enhancing Adaptiveness and Collaboration in Community Forestry in Nepal: Reflections from Participatory Action Research. In Adaptive Collaborative Management of Community Forests in Asia: Experiences from Nepal, Indonesia and the Philippines; Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia, 2007; pp. 50–90.
[49]
Griffiths, T. Seeing ‘REDD’? Forests, Climate Change Mitigation and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; Forest Peoples Programme: Moreton-in-Marsh, UK, 2009.
[50]
Wulan, Y.C.; Yasmi, Y.; Purba, C.; Wollenberg, E. An Analysis of Forestry Sector Conflict in Indonesia 1997–2003; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2004.
[51]
Lawlor, K.; Weinthal, E.; Olander, L. Institutions and policies to protect rural livelihoods in REDD+ regimes. Glob. Environ. Polit. 2010, 10, 1–11, doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00028.
[52]
Larson, A.M. Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: Lessons for REDD+. Glob. Environ. Change 2011, 21, 540–549, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.008.
