Public involvement in the landscape planning process is an essential opportunity to communicate the goals and objectives of a sustainable planning. However, it is also important to accommodate citizen’s attitudes and perceptions of sustainability on a local or regional scale in the decision-making process. This involvement can be supported by interactive information, discussion, and learning opportunities. This article examines how communication in the context of environmental issues can be supported by modern web tools, social media, and new visualization approaches. Furthermore, the potential of social media to support communication about sustainability on a local scale and the prerequisites for its use in the planning process are discussed. Using a case study about citizens’ response to the development of intensive livestock farming in rural setting, we examine what the perception of sustainability on local scale could mean for citizens. Another case study about interactive landscape planning illustrates how such tools can promote communication about environmental issues and local sustainability. Using a framework for the use of social media, we suggest different application levels of social media in participatory planning. Finally, the opportunities to support sustainable decisions with landscape visualization in environmental planning and decision-making issues are discussed.
References
[1]
Barnes, S.H.; Kaase, M. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies; Sage: Beverly Hills, LA, USA, 1979.
[2]
Vester, M. Auf Dem Weg zu Einem, Partizipatorischen Wohlfahrtsstaat“? Vom Informationstechnologisch-Neoliberalen zu Einem ？kotechnologisch-Sozialen Entwicklungspfad. In Zukunft der Demokratie–Demokratie der Zukunft. (in German); Birsl, U., Schley, C., Wilke, P., Eds.; Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Landesbüro Niedersachsen: Hannover, Germany, 2011; pp. 135–168.
[3]
Haaren, C.V.; Oppermann, B.; Friese, K.-I.; Hachmann, R.; Meiforth, J.; Neumann, A.; Tiedtke, S.; Warren-Kretzschmar, B.; Wolter, F.-E. Interaktiver Landschaftsplan K？nigslutter am Elm: Ergebnisse aus dem E+E-Vorhaben “Interaktiver Landschaftsplan K？nigslutter am Elm” des Bundesamtes für Naturschutz. (in German); Bundesamt für Naturschutz: Bonn-Bad Godesberg, Germany, 2005.
[4]
Mitterhuber, R. Social Media und ？ffentliche Verwaltung: Wie weit darf man gehen?(in German). Available online: http://www.nlt.de/pics/medien/1_1347024746/Social_Media_und_oeffentliche_Verwaltung_-_Wie_weit_darf_man_gehen.pdf (accessed on 29 July 2013).
[5]
Bamberg, J. Engaging the public with online discussion and spatial annotations: The generation and transformation of public knowledge. Plan. Theory Prac. 2013, 14, 39–56, doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.738306.
[6]
Artenerfassung digital in Niedersachsen(in German). Available online: www.ardini.de (accessed on 15 October 2013).
[7]
Open elm project. Available online: www.openelm.org.im (accessed on 15 October 2013).
[8]
Pae？ler, B. Social Media für Initiativen und Vereine. (in German); Social Media für Initiativen und Vereine: Mühlheim/Ruhr, Germany, 2013.
[9]
Kanter, B.; Fine, A.H. The Networked Nonprofit: Connecting with Social Media to Drive Change; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2010.
[10]
The Aarhus Convention: What is the Aarhus Convention? Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/aarhus/ (accessed on 8 November 2013).
[11]
Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on Public Access to Environmental Information and Repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32003L0004:EN:HTML (accessed on 8 November 2013).
[12]
Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC-Statement by the Commission. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32003L0035:EN:HTML (accessed on 8 November 2013).
[13]
Schroth, O. From Information to Participation: Interactive Landscape Visualization as a Tool for Collaborative Planning; vdf Hochschulverlag ETH Zürich: Zürich, Switzerland, 2010.
[14]
Salter, J.D.; Campbell, C.; Journeay, M.; Sheppard, S.R.J. The digital workshop: Exploring the use of interactive and immersive visualisation tools in participatory planning. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2090–2101, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.023.
[15]
Nicholson-Cole, S.A. Representing climate change futures: A critique on the use of images for visual communication. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2005, 29, 255–273, doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.05.002.
[16]
Sheppard, S.R.J. Visualizing Climate Change: A Guide to Visual Communication of Climate Change and Developing Local Solutions; Routledge: London, UK, 2012.
[17]
Bachmann, J.; Hage, G. Leitfaden für die kommunale Landschaftsplanung in Baden-Württemberg(in German). Available online: http://www.lubw.baden-wuerttemberg.de/servlet/is/41319/Landschaftsplan_im_Detail.pdf?command=downloadContent&filename=Landschaftsplan_im_Detail.pdf (accessed on 29 July 2013).
[18]
Luz, F. Participatory landscape ecology—A basis for acceptance and implementation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2000, 50, 157–166, doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00087-6.
[19]
Manila, A. Perspectives on Citizen Democratisation and Alienation in the Virtual Public Sphere. In Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age; Hague, B.N., Loader, B.D., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 1999; pp. 23–38.
[20]
Haaren, C.V.; Warren-Kretzschmar, B. The interactive landscape plan: Use and benefits of new technologies in landscape planning and discussion of the interactive landscape plan in Koenigslutter am Elm, Germany. Landsc. Res. 2006, 31, 83–105, doi:10.1080/01426390500448625.
[21]
Council of Europe. European Landscape Convention; Council of Europe: Florence, Italy, 2000.
[22]
Olschowy, G. The development of landscape planning in Germany. Landsc. Plan. 1976, 3, 391–411, doi:10.1016/0304-3924(76)90083-6.
[23]
Faludi, A. A decision-centred view of environmental planning. Landsc. Plan. 1985, 12, 239–256, doi:10.1016/0304-3924(85)90004-8.
[24]
Runge, K. Entwicklungstendenzen der Landschaftsplanung: Vom Frühen Naturschutz bis zur ？kologisch Nachhaltigen Fl？chennutzung. (in German); Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1998.
[25]
Haaren, C.V.; Albert, C. Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: Limitations and synergies. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2011, 7, 150–167, doi:10.1080/21513732.2011.616534.
[26]
Kleinhückelkotten, S. Suffizienz und Lebensstile. Ans？tze für Eine Milieuorientierte Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation. (in German); Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2005.
[27]
Keen, M.; Brown, V.; Dyball, R. Social Learning in Environmental Management: Towards a Sustainable Future; Earthscan: London, UK, 2005.
[28]
Albert, C.; Zimmermann, T.; Knieling, J.; Haaren, C.V. Social learning can benefit decision-making in landscape planning: Gartow case study on climate change adaptation, Elbe valley biosphere reserve. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 105, 347–360, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.024.
[29]
ADAM ADaptation And Mitigation Strategies: supporting European climate policy. Available online: http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/adamproject/about (accessed on 19 December 2013).
[30]
Folke, C.; Colding, J.; Berkes, F. Synthesis: Building Resilience and Adaptive Capacity in Social-Ecological Systems. In Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change; Berkes, F., Colding, J., Folke, C., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003; pp. 352–387.
[31]
Tompkins, E.; Adger, W.N. Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change? Ecol. Soc. 2004, 9, 10.
[32]
Beth’s Blog: Nonprofits and Social Media. Available online: http://beth.typepad.com/beths_blog/2008/10/how-much-time-d.html (accessed on 25 July 2013).
[33]
Meitner, M.J.; Sheppard, S.R.J.; Cavens, D.; Gandy, R.; Picard, P.; Harshaw, H.; Harrison, D. The multiple roles of environmental data visualization in evaluating alternative forest management strategies. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2005, 49, 192–205, doi:10.1016/j.compag.2005.03.002.
[34]
Warren-Kretzschmar, B. Visualization of Landscape Planning–Choosing Appropriate Visualization Methods for Public Participation; Dissertation Leibniz University: Hannover, Germany, 2011.
[35]
CommunityViz. Available online: http://placeways.com/communityviz (accessed on 17 November 2013).
[36]
Sheppard, S.R.J. Bridging the sustainability gap with landscape visualisation in community visioning hubs. Integr. Assess. J. 2006, 6, 79–108.
[37]
Sheppard, S.R.J.; Cizek, P. The ethics of Google Earth: Crossing thresholds from spatial data to landscape visualisation. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2102–2117, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.09.012.
[38]
Leeuwis, C.; Pyburn, R. Social Learning for Rural Resource Management. In Wheelbarrows Full Of Frogs: Social Learning in Rural Resource Management: International Research and Reflections; Leeuwis, C., Pyburn, R., Eds.; Koninklijke Van Gorcum: Assen, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 11–24.
