The paper considers problems and possibilities connected with governing and realising the “transition to sustainability”—or at least to a more deeply resilient energy system. Conceptually its focus is on neo-institutional analysis and critical discourse analysis and the development of a discourse-institutional perspective. The first strand of the paper outlines the limitations of and potential insights into the governance of sustainability transitions that may be derived from adopting an approach based on a more thoroughgoing appreciation and application of work in sociology on neo-institutional theory. The second strand of the paper concerns discourse, recognising the role of text, discursive practice and social structures in framing the possibilities considered available and legitimate for governance. The two strands are brought together in a discourse-institutionalist framework, an approach that is illustrated by a case study of microgeneration in the UK. The paper’s conclusion makes suggestions regarding the conduct of future research employing the proposed approach, and for furthering our understanding of issues connected with the governance of sustainability transitions.
References
[1]
Shove, E.; Walker, G. Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Res. Policy 2010, 39, 471–476, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019.
[2]
Finkelstein, L. What is global governance? Glob. Gov. 1995, 1, 367–372.
[3]
Mol, A.P.J. Ecological modernisation and institutional reflexivity: Environmental reform in the late modern age. Environ. Polit. 1996, 5, 302–323, doi:10.1080/09644019608414266.
[4]
Edquist, C.; Johnson, B. Institutions and Organisations in Systems of Innovation. In Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations; Edquist, C., Ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 1997; pp. 41–63.
[5]
Nelson, R.R.; Winter, S.G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1982.
[6]
North, D.C. Institutional Change and Economic Performance; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990.
[7]
Johnson, B. Institutional Learning. In National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning; Lundvall, B.A., Ed.; Pinter: London, UK, 1992; pp. 23–45.
[8]
Fairclough, N. Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research; Routledge: London, UK, 2003.
[9]
Scott, W.R. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, 3rd ed. ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008.
[10]
Scott, W.R. Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory. Theory Soc. 2008, 37, 427–442, doi:10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z.
[11]
Selznick, P. Leadership in Administration; Harper and Row: New York, NY, USA, 1957.
[12]
Tolbert, P.S.; Zucker, L.G. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reforms 1880–1935. Adm. Sci. Q. 1983, 23, 22–39, doi:10.2307/2392383.
[13]
DiMaggio, P.J.; Powell, W.W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1983, 48, 147–160, doi:10.2307/2095101.
[14]
Meyer, J.W.; Rowan, B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am. J. Sociol. 1977, 83, 340–363.
[15]
Friedland, R.; Alford, R. Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices and Institutional Contradictions. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis; Powell, W.W., DiMaggio, P.J., Eds.; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1991; pp. 232–263.
[16]
Jepperson, R.L. Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalization. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis; Powell, W.W., DiMaggio, P.J., Eds.; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1991; pp. 143–163.
[17]
Scott, W.R. Institutional carriers: Reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences. Ind. Corp. Chang. 2003, 12, 879–894, doi:10.1093/icc/12.4.879.
[18]
Geels, F.W. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res. Policy 2004, 33, 897–920, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015.
[19]
Genus, A. Changing the rules? Institutional innovation and the diffusion of micro-generation. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2012, 24, 711–727, doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.705122.
[20]
Wolsink, M. The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 822–835, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.006.
[21]
German, L.A.; Schoneveld, G. Biofuel Investments in sub-Saharan Africa: A review of the early legal and institutional framework in Zambia. Rev. Policy Res. 2012, 24, 467–491, doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00572.x.
[22]
Reddy, S.; Painuly, J.P. Diffusion of renewable energy technologies—Barriers and stakeholders’ perspectives. Renew. Energy 2004, 29, 1431–1447, doi:10.1016/j.renene.2003.12.003.
[23]
S？derberg, C. Institutional conditions for multi-sector environmental policy integration in Swedish bioenergy policy. Environ. Polit. 2011, 20, 528–546, doi:10.1080/09644016.2011.589625.
[24]
Szarka, J. Wind power, policy learning and paradigm change. Energy Policy. 2006, 34, 3041–3048, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.05.011.
[25]
Dosi, G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Res. Policy. 1982, 1, 147–162, doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6.
[26]
Rip, A.; Kemp, R. Technological Change. In Human Choice and Climate Change, volume 2: Resources and Technology; Rayner, S., Malone, E.J., Eds.; Battelle Press: Columbus, IN, USA, 1998; pp. 327–399.
[27]
Dolata, U. Technological innovations and sectoral change: Transformative capacity, adaptability, patterns of change: An analytical framework. Res. Policy 2009, 38, 1066–1076, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.006.
[28]
Streeck, W.; Thelen, K. Introduction: Institutional change in Advanced Political Economies. In Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies; Streeck, W., Thelen, K., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 3–39.
[29]
Verbong, G.; Geels, F. The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity (1960–2004). Energy Policy. 2007, 32, 1025–37, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.02.010.
[30]
Geels, F.W.; Kemp, R. Dynamics in socio-technical systems: A typology of change process and contrasting case studies. Tech. Soc. 2007, 29, 441–455, doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.08.009.
[31]
Bergek, A.; Hekkert, M.; Jacobsson, S. Functions in Innovation Systems: A Framework for Analysing Energy System Dynamics and Identifying Goals for System-Building Activities by Entrepreneurs and Policy-Makers. In Innovation for a Low Carbon Economy: Economic, Institutional and Management Approaches; Foxon, T., Kohler, J., Oughton, C., Eds.; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2008; pp. 79–111.
[32]
Bergek, A.; Jacobsson, S.; Carlsson, B.; Lindmark, S.; Rickne, A. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Res. Policy. 2008, 37, 407–429, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003.
[33]
Woolthuis, R.K.; Hooimeijer, F.;·Bossink, B.; Mulder, G.; Brouwer, J. Institutional entrepreneurship in sustainable urban development: Dutch successes as inspiration for transformation. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 50, 91–100, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.031.
[34]
Mazza, L.; Rydin, Y. Urban sustainability: discourses, networks and policy tools. Progr. Plann. 1997, 41, 74.
[35]
Hajer, M. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1995.
[36]
Hajer, M. Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Britain. In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning; Fischer, F., Forrester, J., Eds.; Duke University Press: Durham, UK, 1993; pp. 43–76.
[37]
Fischer, F. Policy Discourse and the Politics of Washington Think Tanks. In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning; Fischer, F., Forrester, J., Eds.; Duke University Press: Durham, UK, 1993; pp. 21–42.
[38]
Smith, A.; Kern, F. The transitions storyline in Dutch environmental policy. Environ. Policy 2009, 18, 78–98.
[39]
Rydin, Y. Conflict, Consensus and Rationality and Environmental Planning; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2003.
[40]
March, J.; Olsen, J. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1989.
[41]
Ostrom, E.; Gardner, R.; Walker, J. Rules, Games and Common-Pool Resources; University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1994.
[42]
Rydin, Y. Can we talk ourselves into sustainability? The role of discourse in the environmental policy process. Environ. Values 1999, 8, 467–484, doi:10.3197/096327199129341923.
[43]
Palmer, J. Stopping the unstoppable? A discursive-institutionalist analysis of renewable transport fuel policy. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 2010, 28, 992–1010, doi:10.1068/c09206j.
[44]
Fairclough, N. Language and Power; Longman: London, UK, 2001.
[45]
Fairclough, N. Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Org. Stud. 2005, 26, 915–39, doi:10.1177/0170840605054610.
[46]
Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). UK Low Carbon Transition Plan, 2009: National Strategy for Climate and Energy; TSO: Norwich, UK, 2009.
[47]
Department of Environment. Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). A Framework for Pro-Environmental Behaviours; DEFRA: London, UK, 2008.
[48]
Department of Energy and Climate Change. The UK Renewable Energy Strategy. Cm 7686; TSO: Norwich, UK, 2009.
[49]
Department of Trade and Industry. Our Energy Challenge: Power from the People. Available online: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080205151941/http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/ file27575.pdf (accessed 19 November 2013).
[50]
Department of Energy and Climate Change. Microgeneration Strategy. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/48114/2015-microgeneration-strategy.pdf (accessed on 19 November 2013).
[51]
Department of Energy and Climate Change. Consultation on a Microgeneration Strategy. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/42711/1077-consultation-on-a-microgeneration-strategy.pdf (accessed on 19 November 2013).
[52]
Bergman, N.; Jardine, C. Power from the People: Domestic Microgeneration and the Low Carbon Buildings Programme; Environmental Change Institute: Oxford, UK, 2009.
[53]
Feed-in Tariff, Annual Report 2011–2012. Available online: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/feed-tariff-fit-annual-report-2011-2012 (accessed on 19 November 2013).
[54]
Energy Efficiency Partnership for Homes. The Energy Generating Democracy: DECC Microgeneration Strategy Consultation Final Report. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/42714/668-energy-generating-democracy-microgen.pdf (accessed on 19 November 2013).
[55]
Chouliaraki, L.; Fairclough, N. Critical discourse analysis in organizational studies: Towards an integrationist methodology. J. Manag. Stud. 2010, 47, 1213–1218, doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00883.x.
[56]
Phillips, L.; Jorgensen, M.W. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method; Sage: London, UK, 2002.
