Policy has so far not taken full advantage of the tools offered by the “material flows” school of thought. Resource Productivity (RP) is amongst the normative concepts currently popular among policy makers the nearest one to Material Input Per Service unit (MIPS). However, the RP concept falls substantially short of the MIPS idea, as it puts resource use in relation to the monetary value of production, while MIPS makes reference to services actually delivered by the products. Moreover, the indicator currently used by the European Commission for monitoring RP lacks in life-cycle perspective, which is essential in the MIPS concept. The present paper illustrates, by using Italian case evidence, some of the current RP indicator shortcomings and it discusses a possible alternative, by introducing the life-cycle perspective. In Italy, RP has grown faster than both energy and labour productivity since 1980. This apparently shows that Italy is moving in the right direction. However, a deeper and more extensive analysis regarding the country’s natural resource requirements is necessary before a conclusion can be drawn about the sustainability of the Italian socio-economic process. Therefore, on the one hand we disaggregate material consumption ( i.e., the denominator of RP) into its components; on the other hand we extend the analysis to overall material requirements, including indirect material flows associated with international trade. These analyses, although limited to used materials ( i.e., to resource requirements in Raw Material Equivalents), demonstrate that the Italian success in increasing RP is largely due to the transferring abroad of material flows and ecological burden.
References
[1]
Schmidt-Bleek, F. Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch? MIPS—Das Ma？ für ？kologisches Wirtschaften. (in German); Birkh？user: Berlin, Germany, 1994.
[2]
Dryzek, J.S. Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy; Basil Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 1987.
[3]
Bringezu, S.; Schütz, H.; Steger, S.; Baudisch, J. International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth. The development of total material requirement, direct material inputs and hidden flows and the structure of TMR. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 51, 97–124, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.010.
[4]
Yabar, H.; Hara, K.; Uwasu, M. Comparative assessment of the co-evolution of environmental indicator systems in Japan and China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 61, 43–51, doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.012.
[5]
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Measuring Material Flows and Resource Productivity; OECD: Paris, France, 2008.
[6]
Eurostat. Sustainable Development in the European Union. 2011 Monitoring Report of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy; European Union: Luxembourg, 2011.
[7]
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European economic and social committee and the Committee of the regions: A resource-efficient Europe—Flagship initiative under the Europe 2020 Strategy. 2011. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/resource-efficient-europe/pdf/resource_efficient_europe_en.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2013).
[8]
Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020: “Living well, within the limits of our planet. 2012. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/newprg/pdf/7EAP_Proposal/en.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2013).
[9]
Stiglitz, J.E.; Sen, A.; Fitoussi, J. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Available online: http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf (accessed on 12 June 2013).
[10]
Femia, A. Changing the priorities: From labour productivity to resource productivity. In Factor X—Policy, Strategies and Instruments for a Sustainable Resource Use; Angrick, M., Burger, A., Lehmann, H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany. in press.
[11]
Ritthoff, M.; Rohn, H.; Liedtke, C.; Merten, T. Calculating MIPS. Resource Productivity of Products and Services; Wuppertal Spezial 27e; Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy: Berlin, Germany, 2002.
[12]
Regulation (EU) No 691/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2011 on European environmental economic accounts. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:192:0001:0016:EN:PDF (accessed on 2 December 2013).
[13]
European Commission; Food and Agriculture Organization; International Monetary Fund; Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development; United Nations; World Bank. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting. Central Framework. 2012. Available online: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/White_cover.pdf (accessed on 18 June 2013).
[14]
Van der Voet, E.; Van Oers, L.; Nikolic, I. Dematerialization: Not just a matter of weight. J. Ind. Ecol. 2004, 8, 121–137.
[15]
Eurostat. Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounts and Derived Indicators. A Methodological Guide; European Communities: Luxembourg, 2001.
[16]
Bleischwitz, R.; Bahn-Walkowiak, B.; Onischka, M.; R？der, O.; Steger, S. The Links between the Environment and Competitiveness—Part B: The Relation between Resource Productivity and Competitiveness. Project: ENV.G.1/ETU/2007/0041; Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy: Berlin, Germany, 2009.
[17]
Steinberger, J.K.; Krausmann, F. Material and energy productivity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 1169–1176.
[18]
Dittrich, M.; Giljum, S.; Lutter, S.; Polzin, C. Green Economies around the World? Implications of Resource Use for Development and the Environment; Sustainable Europe Research Institute: Vienna, Austria, 2012.
[19]
European Environment Agency. The European Environment State and Outlook 2010: Material Resources and Waste—2012 Update; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2012.
[20]
European Commission; Directorate-general Environment. Consultation Paper: Options for Resource Efficiency Indicators. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/consultations/pdf/consultation_resource.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2013).
[21]
Schoer, K.; Giegrich, J.; Kovanda, J.; Lauwigi, C.; Liebich, A.; Buyny, S.; Matthias, J. Conversion of European Product Flows into Raw Material Equivalents. Final Report of the Project: Assistance in the Development and Maintenance of Raw Material Equivalents Conversion Factors and Calculation of RMC Time Series, Commissioned by Statistical Office of the European Communities—Eurostat; Directorate E—Agriculture and Environmental Statistics; Statistical Cooperation Unit E3: Environment statistics; IFEU—Institut für Energie-und Umweltforschung: Heidelberg, Germany, 2012.
[22]
Marra Campanale, R.; Femia, A. Air emissions and displacement of production: A case study for Italy, 1995–2007. In Hybrid Economic-Environmental Accounts; Costantini, V., Mazzanti, M., Montini, A., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2011; pp. 104–121.
[23]
Pasinetti, L. The notion of vertical integration in economic analysis. Metroeconomica 1973, 25, 1–29, doi:10.1111/j.1467-999X.1973.tb00539.x.
[24]
Leontief, W. Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: An input-output approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1970, 262–271, doi:10.2307/1926294.
[25]
Femia, A.; Marra Campanale, R.; Vignani, D. The description of the physical dimension of the economy in historical perspective—Material flows, Italy 1951–2008. In Statistics in the 150 Years from Italian Unification. SIS 2011 Statistical Conference; Mignani, S., Costa, M., Eds.;. Quaderni di Dipartimento, Serie Ricerche Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna: Bologna, Italy, 2012.
[26]
BIO Intelligence Service. Modelling of Milestones for achieving Resource Efficiency, Turning Milestones into Quantified Objectives—Further Analysis on Selected IndicatorsPrepared for the European Commission, DG Environment. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/resource_efficiency/pdf/Task%202%20report.pdf (accessed on 23 September 2013).
[27]
European Resource Efficiency Platform. Working Group II. Setting Objectives and Measuring Progress. First Recommendations to Sherpas. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/resource_efficiency/documents/wgiireportnov2012.pdf (accessed on 23 September 2013).
