全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Resources  2013 

Partnership Models for Climate Compatible Development: Experiences from Zambia

DOI: 10.3390/resources2010001

Keywords: participation, stakeholders, climate change, best practices, communities, sustainability

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Partnership working is necessary to allow nations to harness the evolving opportunities presented by climate finance and to progress towards climate compatible development (CCD). However, the new multi-stakeholder partnerships being formed and the factors affecting their outcomes remain poorly understood. This paper aims to identify the characteristics of partnership models that can lead to successful delivery of CCD projects by analyzing case study data from two projects in Zambia. The projects are primarily funded under the umbrella of Corporate Social Responsibility and support activities such as conservation farming which can have carbon storage (mitigation), adaptation and rural development benefits. In each of the case study projects, multiple partnerships have been established between private sector companies, government, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), traditional authorities and community stakeholders to achieve project aims. A new partnership evaluation model is developed and applied to analyze the partnerships formed. Findings show that the rationale behind the partnership, partner-related factors, and process-related factors can all affect achievement of the project’s aims. Good practices are identified which can inform future partnerships and projects. For example, when establishing a project, the initiating partner must identify gaps that can be addressed by establishing one or more partnership(s). Careful consideration of which partners can best address these gaps allows for synergies in contributions across the partnership required for successful project implementation. Transparency, openness and communication over roles and responsibilities are key to successful partnerships, and power imbalances between partners will reduce the utilization of each partner’s strengths. When working with communities, extra care must be taken to ensure projects are appropriate and relevant to local needs, as well as allowing goals to be met, by engaging communities from the beginning of the project.

References

[1]  Klein, R.J.; Eriksen, S.; Naess, L.O.; Hammill, A.; Tanner, T.M.; Robledo, C.; O’Brien, K. Portfolio Screening to Support the Mainstreaming of Adaptation to Climate Change into Development Assistance; Tyndall Centre Working Paper No. 102; University of East Anglia: Norwich, UK, 2007.
[2]  Stringer, L.C.; Dyer, J.; Reed, M.S.; Dougill, A.J.; Twyman, C.; Mkwambisi, D. Adaptations to climate change, drought and desertification: Insights to enhance policy in southern Africa. Environ. Sci. Policy 2009, 12, 748–765, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.04.002.
[3]  Mitchell, T.; Maxwell, S. Defining Climate Compatible Development; CDKN ODI Policy Brief November 2010/A; Climate and Development Knowledge Network (CDKN): London, UK, 2010.
[4]  Stringer, L.C.; Dougill, A.J.; Dyer, J.C.; Kalaba, F.K.; Mkwambisi, D.D.; Mngoli, M. Challenges and opportunities for carbon management in Malawi and Zambia. Carbon Manag. 2012, 3, 159–173, doi:10.4155/cmt.12.14.
[5]  Bryan, E.; Akpalu, W.; Yesuf, M.; Ringler, C. Global carbon markets: Opportunities for sub-Saharan Africa in the agriculture and forestry. Clim. Dev. 2010, 2, 309–331, doi:10.3763/cdev.2010.0057.
[6]  Dougill, A.J.; Stringer, L.C.; Leventon, J.; Riddell, M.; Rueff, H.; Spracklen, D.V.; Butt, E. Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: From forests to rangelands. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2012, 367, 3178–3190, doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0418.
[7]  Stringer, L.C.; Dougill, A.J.; Thomas, A.D.; Spracklen, D.V.; Chesterman, S.; Ifejika Speranza, C.; Rueff, H.; Riddell, M.; Williams, M.; Beedy, T.; et al. Challenges and opportunities in linking carbon sequestration, livelihoods and ecosystem service provision in drylands. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 19–20, 121–135.
[8]  Dyer, J.C.; Stringer, L.C.; Dougill, A.J. Jatropha curcas: Sowing local seeds of success in Malawi? In response to Achten et al. (2010). J. Arid Environ. 2012, 79, 107–110, doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.12.004.
[9]  Pinkse, J.; Kolk, A. Addressing the climate change—Sustainable development nexus. Bus. Soc. 2012, 51, 176–210, doi:10.1177/0007650311427426.
[10]  Reed, M.S.; Graves, A.; Dandy, N.; Posthumus, H.; Hubacek, K.; Morris, J.; Prell, C.; Quinn, C.H.; Stringer, L.C. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 1933–1949, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001.
[11]  Stewart, A.; Gray, T. The authenticity of “type two” multistakeholder partnerships for water and sanitation in Africa: When is a stakeholder a partner? Environ. Polit. 2006, 15, 362–378, doi:10.1080/09644010600627592.
[12]  Selsky, J.W.; Parker, B. Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. J. Manag. 2005, 31, 849–873, doi:10.1177/0149206305279601.
[13]  Forsyth, T. Promoting the development dividend of climate technology transfer: Can cross-sector partnerships help? World Dev. 2007, 35, 1684–1698, doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.001.
[14]  Andonova, L.; Betsill, M.; Bulkeley, H. Transnational climate governance. Glob. Environ. Polit. 2009, 9, 52–73, doi:10.1162/glep.2009.9.2.52.
[15]  Esteves, A.M.; Barclay, M.A. New approaches to evaluating the performance of corporate-community partnerships: A case study from the minerals sector. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 103, 189–202, doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0860-7.
[16]  Streck, C. New partnerships in global environmental policy: The clean development mechanism. J. Environ. Dev. 2004, 13, 295–322, doi:10.1177/1070496504268696.
[17]  Ros-Tonen, M.A.F.; van Andel, T.; Morsello, C.; Otsuki, K.; Rosendo, S.; Scholz, I. Forest-related partnerships in Brazilian Amazonia: There is more to sustainable forest management than reduced impact logging. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256, 1482–1497, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.044.
[18]  Arevalo, E.B.; Ros-Tonen, M.A.F. Discourses, power negotiations and indigenous political organization in forest partnerships: The case of Selva de Mataven, Colombia. Hum. Ecol. 2009, 37, 733–747, doi:10.1007/s10745-009-9272-z.
[19]  Parry, M.L.; Canziani, O.F.; Palutikof, J.P.; van der Linden, P.J.; Hanson, C.E. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability—Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007.
[20]  Füssel, H. Review and Quantitative Analysis of Indices of Climate Change Exposure, Adaptive Capacity, Sensitivity and Impacts; World Bank: Potsdam, Germany, 2009.
[21]  Boko, M.; Niang, I.; Nyong, A.; Vogel, C.; Githeko, A.; Medany, M.; Osman-Elasha, B.; Tabo, R.; Yanda, P. Africa. In Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability—Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J., Hanson, C.E., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 433–467.
[22]  Human Development Report 2011 Team. Sustainability and Equity: A Better Future for All; United Nations Development Programme: New York, NY, USA, 2011.
[23]  Syampungani, S.; Chirwa, P.W.; Akinnifesi, F.K.; Sileshi, G.; Ajayi, O.C. The miombo woodlands at the cross roads: Potential threats, sustainable livelihoods, policy gaps and challenges. Nat. Resour. Forum 2009, 33, 150–159, doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2009.01218.x.
[24]  Zhong, L.; Mol, A.; Fu, T. Public-private partnerships in China’s urban water sector. Environ. Manag. 2008, 41, 863–877, doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9070-1.
[25]  Kolk, A.; van Tulder, R.; Kostwinder, E. Business and partnerships for development. Eur. Manag. J. 2008, 26, 262–273, doi:10.1016/j.emj.2008.01.007.
[26]  Rondinelli, D.A.; London, T. How corporations and environmental groups cooperate: Assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations. Acad. Manag. Exec. 2003, 17, 61–76, doi:10.5465/AME.2003.9474812.
[27]  Laing, J.; Wegner, A.; Moore, S.; Weiler, B.; Pfueller, S.; Lee, D.; Macbeth, J.; Croy, G.; Lockwood, M. Understanding Partnerships for Protected Area Tourism: Learning from the Literature; CRC for Sustainable Tourism: Queensland, Australia, 2008.
[28]  Leach, W.D.; Pelkey, N.W. Making watershed partnerships work: A review of the empirical literature. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2001, 127, 378–385, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:6(378).
[29]  Lasker, R.D.; Weiss, E.S. Creating partnership synergy: The critical role of community stakeholders. J. Health Human Serv. Adm. 2003, 26, 119–139.
[30]  Van Tulder, R.; Kostwinder, E. From Idea to Partnership. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Development Partnerships; Expert Center for Sustainable Business and Development Cooperation: The Hague, The Netherlands, 2007.
[31]  Cairns, B.; Harris, M. Local cross-sector partnerships tackling the challenges collaboratively. Nonprofit Manag. Leadersh. 2011, 21, 311–324, doi:10.1002/nml.20027.
[32]  Timothy, D.J. Cross-border partnership in tourism resource management: international parks along the US-Canada border. J. Sustain. Tour. 1999, 7, 182–205, doi:10.1080/09669589908667336.
[33]  Stringer, L.; Dougill, A.; Fraser, E.; Hubacek, K.; Prell, C.; Reed, M.S. Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social ecological systems: A critical review. Ecol. Soc. 2006, 11, 39:1–39:22.
[34]  Arnstein, S.R. A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Plan. 1969, 35, 216–224, doi:10.1080/01944366908977225.
[35]  Pretty, J. Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Dev. 1995, 23, 1247–1263, doi:10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F.
[36]  Leventon, J.; Dyer, J.; Stringer, L.C.; Dougill, A.J.; Syampungani, S.; Kalaba, G.; Munyemba, F. Synergy Across Sectors in Pro-Poor Development: Outcomes from a Multi-Stakeholder Workshop in Zambia & the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Available online: http://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/research/sri/cdkn/ (accessed on 15 October 2012).
[37]  Hilson, G. Corporate social responsibility in the extractive industries: Experiences from developing countries. Resour. Policy 2012, 37, 131–137, doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.01.002.
[38]  FAO Conservation Agriculture Home Page. Available online: http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/ (accessed on 15 October 2012).
[39]  Bradshaw, M.; Stratford, E. Qualitative research design and rigour. In Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, 2nd; Hay, I., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Melbourne, UK, 2005; pp. 67–76.
[40]  Banda, L. Zambia: YAPYA Launches K1.6 Billion Project. Times of Zambia, 15 March 2012. Available online: http://allafrica.com/stories/201203160011.html (accessed on 15 October 2012).
[41]  Poulton, C.; Macartney, J. Can Public-private partnerships leverage private investment in agricultural value chains in Africa? A preliminary review. World Dev. 2012, 40, 96–109, doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.017.
[42]  Gilberthorpe, E.; Banks, G. Development on whose terms? CSR discourse and social realities in Papua New Guinea’s extractive industries sector. Resour. Policy 2012, 37, 185–193, doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2011.09.005.
[43]  Kefasi, N.; Oluwole, F.; Adewale, A.; Gbadebo, O. Promoting effective multi-stakeholder partnership for policy development for smallholder farming systems: A case of the Sub Saharan Africa challenge programme. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 3451–3455.
[44]  Climate Development Knowledge Network (CDKN) Web Page. Assessing Institutional and Governance Partnerships for Climate Compatible Development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Available online: http://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/research/sri/cdkn/ (accessed on 12 March 2013).
[45]  In the Zambian agricultural sector, extension services are provided on a camp level, consisting of a small number of villages. Camps are organized within larger blocks, with a block officer providing coordination and support to camp officers.
[46]  The Climate and Development Knowledge Network is a project funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID). It is managed by an alliance of organizations led by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), and including Fundación Futuro Latinoamericano, INTRAC, LEAD International, the Overseas Development Institute, and SouthSouthNorth.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133