全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Collaborative Concept Mapping: Connecting with Research Team Capacities

DOI: 10.1155/2014/836068

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Concept mapping has generally been used as a means to increase the depth and breadth of understanding within a particular knowledge domain or discipline. In this paper we trace the deployment of collaborative concept mapping by a research team in higher education and analyse its effectiveness using the crime metaphor of motive, means, and opportunity. This case study exemplifies two iterations of the research team’s collaborative concept map and shows how the process of the construction of such maps enabled the opportunity for team dialogue and coconstruction that was focused, hands-on, and visual. The concept mapping process provided the team with a meaning-making mechanism through which to share understandings and explore the team’s potential capacities. 1. Introduction In an effort to address the quality and impact of research, higher education institutions have invested in research capacity building initiatives including those that leverage the expertise and relationships within research collaborations and teams. Yet, the various methods and tools appropriate for understanding and building research capacity within research teams remain underexplored. This paper reports on a case study of a collaborative concept mapping process (CCM) with an educational research team located at a regional Australian university. We argue that collaborative concept mapping is an exercise that embodies effective capacity building processes by enabling exploration, articulation, and negotiation of shared motives and opportunities for research team development. We undertake this journey by first conceptualising capacity and the building of research capacity as it appears in the literature. We then move to CCM and argue how it is well suited as a capacity building process. Next we introduce the case study per se, summarise the research team’s first experience with CCM, and highlight and explore the refinements made with the team’s second attempt. The paper culminates with an analysis of CCM as a capacity building process in relation to the means, motives, and opportunity framework of Britton as deployed by James and Wrigley [1]. 1.1. Conceptualising Capacity Building Broadly, capacity building stimulates desired development and change for individuals, organisations, and communities. Yet, capacity building has an intangibility that “makes it the stuff of myth or magic” [2, page 210]. First, capacity building as a concept has been described as a mysterious, elusive, confused, and misinterpreted, with numerous definitions present in the literature [1–4]. Further, capacity

References

[1]  R. James and R. Wrigley, “Investigating the mystery of capacity building: learning from the Praxis programme,” Praxis Paper 18, International NGO Training and Research Centre (INTRAC), Oxford, UK, 2007, http://www.intrac.org/data/files/resources/415/Praxis-Paper-18-Investigating-the-Mystery-of-Capacity-Building.pdf.
[2]  J. Harrow, “‘Capacity building” as a public management goal: myth, magic or the main chance?” Public Management Review, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 209–230, 2010.
[3]  S. Kenny and M. Clarke, Challenging Capacity Building: Comparative Perspectives Rethinking International Development, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY, USA, 2010.
[4]  B. Kwan, J. Frankish, D. Quantz, and J. Flores, A Synthesis Paper on the Conceptualization and Measurement of Community Capacity, Institute, of Health Promotion Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 2003, http://www.ufv.ca/Assets/BC+Centres+(CRIM)/Non-Profit+Development/Articles/Best+Practises+Community+Capacity+Building/A+Synthesis+Paper.pdf.
[5]  J. McCalman, K. Tsey, R. Kitau, and S. McGinty, “‘Bringing us back to our origin”: adapting and transferring an Indigenous Australian values-based leadership capacity-building course for community development in Papua New Guinea,” Community Development, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 393–408, 2012.
[6]  E. Kendall, H. Muenchberger, N. Sunderland, M. Harris, and D. Cowan, “Collaborative capacity building in complex community-based health partnerships: a model for translating knowledge into action,” Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. E1–E13, 2012.
[7]  B. R. Crisp, H. Swerissen, and S. J. Duckett, “Four approaches to capacity building in health: consequences for measurement and accountability,” Health Promotion International, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 99–107, 2000.
[8]  K. B. Mistry, C. S. Minkovitz, A. W. Riley et al., “A new framework for childhood health promotion: the role of policies and programs in building capacity and foundations of early childhood health,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 102, no. 9, pp. 1688–1696, 2012.
[9]  L. de George-Walker and M. A. Tyler, “Building capacity for collaborative research: revisiting a collaborative concept mapping exercise within the context of a research team,” in Constructing Capacities: Building Capabilities Through Learning and Engagement, P. A. Danaher, L. de George-Walker, R. Henderson et al., Eds., pp. 239–255, Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2012.
[10]  C. Mitchell and L. Sackney, Profound Improvement: Building Capacity for a Learning Community, Routledge, Abingdon, UK, 2011.
[11]  K. Malik and S. Wagle, “Civic engagement and development: introducing the issues,” in Capacity for Development: New Solutions to Old Problems, S. Fukuda-Parr, C. Lopes, and K. Malik, Eds., pp. 85–100, Earthscan, London, UK, 2002.
[12]  H. A. Mengers, “Making urban sector lending work; lessons from a capacity building programme in Karnataka, India,” Habitat International, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 375–390, 2000.
[13]  J. F. Ohiorhenuan and S. M. Wunker, Capacity Building Requirements for Global Environmental Protection, Global Environment Facility, Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
[14]  M. A. Tyler and L. de George-Walker, “Collaborative concept mapping: an education research team leveraging their collaborative efforts,” in SustaInIng Synergies: Collaborative Research and ResearchIng Collaboration, C. H. Arden, P. A. Danaher, L. de George-Walker et al., Eds., pp. 54–71, Post Pressed, Mount Gravatt, Qld, Australia, 2010.
[15]  J. Murray and A. Pollard, “International perspectives on research capacity building,” British Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 219–224, 2011.
[16]  A. M. Barrett, M. Crossley, and H. A. Dachi, “International collaboration and research capacity building: learning from the EdQual experience,” Comparative Education, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 25–43, 2011.
[17]  B. Sterland, “Metaphor and analogy: creating meaning and understanding complexity,” Praxis Note 9, International NGO Training and Research Centre (INTRAC), Oxford, UK, 2005, http://www.intrac.org/data/files/resources/100/Praxis-Note-9-Metaphor-and-Analogy.pdf.
[18]  R. Leitch, “Harnessing the slipstream: building educational research capacity in Northern Ireland,” Journal of Education for Teaching, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 355–371, 2009.
[19]  B. Ridley, “Educational research culture and capacity building: the case of Addis Ababa University,” British Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 285–302, 2011.
[20]  S. Scott, “Team working: an anathema to academics?” in In Practice, vol. 1, pp. 1–4, 2009, http://www.lfhe.ac.uk/publications/inpractice21.pdf.
[21]  A. Wary and M. Wallace, “Accelerating the development of expertise: a step-change in social science research capacity building,” British Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 241–264, 2011.
[22]  G. Castillo, Research Partnerships: Issues, Lessons, Results and Dreams for Sustainable Development, ODI Agricultural Research and Extension Network, London, UK, 1997.
[23]  T. M. Paulus, M. Woodside, and M. F. Ziegler, “‘I tell you, it's a journey, isn't it?” understanding collaborative meaning making in qualitative research,” Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 852–862, 2010.
[24]  S. M. Ritchie and D. L. Rigano, “Solidarity through collaborative research,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 129–150, 2007.
[25]  J. Basque and M. Lavoie, “Collaborative concept mapping in education: major research trends,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Concept Mapping, A. J. Ca?as and J. D. Novak, Eds., San José, Costa Rica, 2006, http://cmc.ihmc.us/cmc2006Papers/cmc2006-p192.pdf.
[26]  J. D. Novak and A. J. Ca?as, “The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them (revised ed.),” Tech. Rep. IHMC CmapTools 2006-01, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf.
[27]  J. D. Novak and D. B. Gowin, Learning How to Learn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1984.
[28]  J. Watt, “Organising information: concept maps and data charts,” Classroom, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 26–27, 2002.
[29]  E. Chittenden, “Building conceptual bridges,” Teacher, vol. 178, pp. 58–60, 2007.
[30]  S. Kuhn and J. Davidson, “Thinking with things, teaching with things,” Qualitative Research Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 63–75, 2007.
[31]  P. A. Okebukola and O. J. Jegede, “Cognitive preference and learning mode as determinants of meaningful learning through concept mapping,” Science Education, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 489–500, 1988.
[32]  N. Stoyanova and P. Kommers, “Concept mapping as a medium of shared cognition in computer-supported collaborative problem solving,” Journal of Interactive Learning Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 111–133, 2002.
[33]  W. M. Roth and A. Roychoudhury, “The social construction of scientific concepts or the concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science,” Science Education, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 531–557, 1992.
[34]  S. Sizmur and J. Osborne, “Learning processes and collaborative concept mapping,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1117–1135, 1997.
[35]  C. van Boxtel, J. van der Linden, E. Roelofs, and G. Erkens, “Collaborative concept mapping: provoking and supporting meaningful discourse,” Theory into Practice, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2002.
[36]  N. M. Webb, S. H. Farivar, and A. M. Mastergeorge, “Productive helping in cooperative groups,” Theory into Practice, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2002.
[37]  W. Zwaal and H. Otting, “The impact of concept mapping on the process of problem-based learning,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 104–128, 2012.
[38]  A. M. Liggett, C. E. Glesne, A. P. Johnston, S. B. Hasazi, and R. A. Schattman, “Teaming in qualitative research: lessons learned,” Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 77–88, 1994.
[39]  P. Woods, M. Boyle, B. Jeffrey, and G. Troman, “A research team in ethnography,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 85–98, 2000.
[40]  D. Tedmanson, “Whose capacity needs building? Open hearts and empty hands: reflections on capacity building in remote communities,” in Proceedings of the International Critical Management Studies Conference, Postcolonialism Stream, University of Cambridge, 2005, http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/ejrot/cmsconference/2005/abstracts/postcolonialism/Tedmanson.pdf.
[41]  CBRNetwork, http://www.usq.edu.au/education/research/current-research/cbrnetwork.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133