Mountainous rivers are the most significant source of water supply in the Himalayan provinces of India. The drainage basin dynamics of these rivers are controlled by the tectonomorphic parameters, which include both surface and subsurface characteristics of a basin. To understand the drainage basin dynamics and their usefulness in watershed prioritisation and management in terms of soil erosion studies and groundwater potential assessment and flood hazard risk reduction in mountainous rivers, morphometric analysis of a Himalayan River (Supin River) basin has been taken as a case study. The entire Supin River basin has been subdivided into 27 subwatersheds and 36 morphometric parameters have been calculated under four broad categories: drainage network, basin geometry, drainage texture, and relief characteristics, each of which is further grouped into five different clusters having similar morphometric properties. The various morphometric parameters have been correlated with each other to understand their underlying relationship and control over the basin hydrogeomorphology. The result thus generated provides adequate knowledge base required for decision making during strategic planning and delineation of prioritised hazard management zones in mountainous terrains. 1. Introduction Morphometry is the measurement and mathematical analysis of the configuration of the earth’s surface and of the shape and dimension of its landforms [1]. The form and structure of drainage basins and their associated drainage networks are described by their morphometric parameters. Morphometric properties of a drainage basin are quantitative attributes of the landscape that are derived from the terrain or elevation surface and drainage network within a drainage basin. Application of quantitative techniques in morphometric analysis of drainage basins was initially undertaken by Horton et al. [2–8] from topographic maps using manual methods. Remote sensing and Geographical Information System (GIS) techniques are increasingly being used for morphometric analysis of drainage basins throughout the world [9–13]. Quantitative techniques have been applied to study the morphometric properties of different drainage basins in India [14–23]. Several authors have studied morphometric properties of drainage basins as indicators of structural influence on drainage development and neotectonic activity [24–27]. In many studies morphometric analysis has been used to assess the groundwater potentiality of the basins and to locate suitable sites for construction of check dams and artificial
References
[1]
J. I. Clarke, “Morphometry from maps,” in Essays in Geomorphology, G. H. Dury, Ed., pp. 235–274, Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, 1966.
[2]
R. E. Horton, “Drainage basin characteristics,” Transactions of American Geophysics Union, vol. 13, pp. 350–361, 1932.
[3]
R. E. Horton, “Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 56, pp. 275–370, 1945.
[4]
A. N. Strahler, “Hypsometric analysis of erosional topography,” Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, vol. 63, pp. 1117–1142, 1952.
[5]
A. N. Strahler, “Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology,” Transactions of American Geophysics Union, vol. 38, pp. 913–920, 1957.
[6]
A. N. Strahler, “Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks,” in Handbook of Applied Hydrology, V. T. Chow, Ed., McGraw Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1964.
[7]
S. A. Schumm, “Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey,” Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, vol. 67, pp. 597–646, 1956.
[8]
R. J. Chorley and M. A. Morgan, “Comparison of morphometric features, Unaka Mountains, Tennessee and North Carolina, and Dartmoor, England,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 17–34, 1962.
[9]
P. W. Williams, “Morphometric analysis of polygonal karst in New Guinea,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 761–796, 1972.
[10]
L. M. Mesa, “Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucumán, Argentina),” Environmental Geology, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1235–1242, 2006.
[11]
P. Lyew-Ayee, H. A. Viles, and G. E. Tucker, “The use of GIS-based digital morphometric techniques in the study of cockpit karst,” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 165–179, 2007.
[12]
T. B. Altin and B. N. Altin, “Development and morphometry of drainage network in volcanic terrain, Central Anatolia, Turkey,” Geomorphology, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 485–503, 2011.
[13]
M. Buccolini, L. Coco, C. Cappadonia, and E. Rotigliano, “Relationships between a new slope morphometric index and calanchi erosion in northern Sicily, Italy,” Geomorphology, vol. 149-150, pp. 41–48, 2012.
[14]
S. S. Vittala, S. Govindaih, and H. H. Gowda, “Morphometric analysis of sub-watershed in the Pavada area of Tumkur district, South India, using remote sensing and GIS techniques,” Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 351–362, 2004.
[15]
R. Chopra, R. D. Dhiman, and P. K. Sharma, “Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in Gurdaspur district, Punjab using remote sensing and GIS techniques,” Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 531–539, 2005.
[16]
H. Vijith and R. Sateesh, “GIS based morphometric analysis of two major upland sub-watersheds of Meenachil river in Kerala,” Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 181–185, 2006.
[17]
M. Rudraiah, S. Govindaiah, and S. S. Vittala, “Morphometry using remote sensing and GIS techniques in the sub-basins of Kagna river basin, Gulburga district, Karnataka, India,” Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 351–360, 2008.
[18]
M. Bagyaraj and B. Gurugnanam, “Significance of morphometry studies, soil characteristics, erosion phenomena and landform processes using remote Sensing and GIS for Kodaikanal Hills, a global biodiversity hotpot in Western Ghats, Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu, South India,” Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 221–233, 2011.
[19]
I. Malik, S. Bhat, and N. A. Kuchay, “Watershed based drainage morphometric analysis of Lidder catchment in Kashmir valley using Geographical Information System,” Recent Research in Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 118–126, 2011.
[20]
J. Thomas, S. Joseph, K. P. Thrivikramji, and G. Abe, “Morphometric analysis of the drainage system and its hydrological implications in the rain shadow regions, Kerala, India,” Journal of Geographical Sciences, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1077–1088, 2011.
[21]
N. S. Magesh, K. V. Jitheshlal, N. Chandrasekar, and K. V. Jini, “GIS based morphometric evaluation of Chimmini and Mupily watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Thrissur District, Kerala, India,” Earth Science Information, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 111–121, 2012.
[22]
P. Singh, J. K. Thakur, and U. C. Singh, “Morphometric analysis of Morar River Basin, Madhya Pradesh, India, using remote sensing and GIS techniques,” Environmental Earth Science, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 1967–1977, 2012.
[23]
K. Pareta and U. Pareta, “Quantitative geomorphological analysis of a watershed of Ravi River Basin, H.P. India,” International Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–56, 2012.
[24]
S. K. Nag and S. Chakraborty, “Influence of rock types and structures in the development of drainage network in hard rock area,” Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 2003.
[25]
J. D. Das, Y. Shujat, and A. K. Saraf, “Spatial technologies in deriving the morphotectonic characteristics of tectonically active Western Tripura Region, Northeast India,” Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 249–258, 2011.
[26]
R. Bali, K. K. Agarwal, S. Nawaz Ali, S. K. Rastogi, and K. Krishna, “Drainage morphometry of Himalayan Glacio-fluvial basin, India: hydrologic and neotectonic implications,” Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1163–1174, 2012.
[27]
A. Demoulin, “Basin and river profile morphometry: a new index with a high potential for relative dating of tectonic uplift,” Geomorphology, vol. 126, no. 1-2, pp. 97–107, 2011.
[28]
P. D. Sreedevi, K. Subrahmanyam, and S. Ahmed, “The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain,” Environmental Geology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 412–420, 2005.
[29]
K. Narendra and K. N. Rao, “Morphometry of the Meghadrigedda watershed, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh using GIS and Resourcesat data,” Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 102–110, 2006.
[30]
K. Avinash, K. S. Jayappa, and B. Deepika, “Prioritization of sub-basins based on geomorphology and morphometricanalysis using remote sensing and geographic informationsystem (GIS) techniques,” Geocarto International, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 569–592, 2011.
[31]
A. Mishra, D. P. Dubey, and R. N. Tiwari, “Morphometric analysis of Tons basin, Rewa District, Madhya Pradesh, based on watershed approach,” Earth Science India, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 171–180, 2011.
[32]
I. Jasmin and P. Mallikarjuna, “Morphometric analysis of Araniar river basin using remote sensing and geographical information system in the assessment of groundwater potential,” Arab Journal of Geosciences, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 3683–3692, 2013.
[33]
A. Javed, M. Y. Khanday, and S. Rais, “Watershed prioritization using morphometric and land use/land cover parameters: a remote sensing and GIS based approach,” Journal of the Geological Society of India, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 63–75, 2011.
[34]
P. C. Patton and V. R. Baker, “Morphometry and floods in small drainage basins subject to diverse hydrogeomorphic controls,” Water Resources Research, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 941–952, 1976.
[35]
M. Diakakis, “A method for flood hazard mapping based on basin morphometry: application in two catchments in Greece,” Natural Hazards, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 803–814, 2011.
[36]
H. B. Wakode, D. Dutta, V. R. Desai, K. Baier, and R. Azzam, “Morphometric analysis of the upper catchment of Kosi River using GIS techniques,” Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 395–408, 2011.
[37]
S. A. Romshoo, S. A. Bhat, and I. Rashid, “Geoinformatics for assessing the morphometric control on hydrological response at watershed scale in the Upper Indus basin,” Journal of Earth System Science, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 659–686, 2012.
[38]
A. Yin, “Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogen as constrained by along-strike variation of structural geometry, exhumation history, and foreland sedimentation,” Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 76, no. 1-2, pp. 1–131, 2006.
[39]
K. S. Valdiya, Geology of the Kumaon Lesser Himalaya, Wadia Institute of Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India, 1980.
[40]
P. Srivastava and G. Mitra, “Thrust geometries and deep structure of the outer and lesser Himalaya, Kumaon and Garhwal (India): implications for evolution of the Himalayan fold-and-thrust belt,” Tectonics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 89–109, 1994.
[41]
P. G. DeCelles, G. E. Gehrels, J. Quade, and T. P. Ojha, “Eocene-early Miocene foreland basin development and the history of Himalayan thrusting, western and central Nepal,” Tectonics, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 741–765, 1998.
[42]
P. G. DeCelles, D. M. Robinson, and G. Zandt, “Implications of shortening in the Himalayan fold-thrust belt for uplift of the Tibetan Plateau,” Tectonics, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1–25, 2002.
[43]
O. N. Pearson and P. G. DeCelles, “Structural geology and regional tectonic significance of the Ramgarh thrust, Himalayan fold-thrust belt of Nepal,” Tectonics, vol. 24, no. 4, Article ID TC4008, pp. 1–26, 2005.
[44]
N. McQuarrie, D. Robinson, S. Long et al., “Preliminary stratigraphic and structural architecture of Bhutan: implications for the along strike architecture of the Himalayan system,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters, vol. 272, no. 1-2, pp. 105–117, 2008.
[45]
J. C. Vannay and B. Grasemann, “Himalayan inverted metamorphism and syn-convergence extension as a consequence of a general shear extrusion,” Geological Magazine, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 253–276, 2001.
[46]
K. S. Valdiya, “Reactivation of terrane-defining boundary thrusts in central sector of the Himalaya: implications,” Current Science, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 1418–1431, 2001.
[47]
R. Kumar, S. K. Ghosh, R. K. Mazari, and S. J. Sangode, “Tectonic impact on the fluvial deposits of Plio-Pleistocene Himalayan foreland basin, India,” Sedimentary Geology, vol. 158, no. 3-4, pp. 209–234, 2003.
[48]
H. K. Sachan, M. J. Kohn, A. Saxena, and S. L. Corrie, “The Malari leucogranite, Garhwal Himalaya, Northern India: chemistry, age, and tectonic implications,” Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, vol. 122, no. 11-12, pp. 1865–1876, 2010.
[49]
J. E. Mueller, “An introduction to the hydraulic and topographic sinuosity indexes,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 371–385, 1968.
[50]
H. Gravelius, Flusskunde, Goschen'sche Verlagshandlung, Berlin, Germany, 1941.
[51]
M. A. Melton, An Analysis of the Relations among Elements of Climate, Surface Properties and Geomorphology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA, 1957.
[52]
J. S. Smart and A. J. Surkan, “The relation between mainstream length and area in drainage basins,” Water Resources Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 963–974, 1967.
[53]
P. E. Black, “Hydrograph responses to geomorphic model watershed characteristics and precipitation variables,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 309–329, 1972.
[54]
A. Faniran, “The index of drainage intensity -a provisional new drainage factor,” Australian Journal of Science, vol. 31, pp. 328–330, 1968.
[55]
S. Singh and A. Dubey, Geo-environmental Planning of Watersheds in India, vol. 28, Chugh, Allahabad, India, 1994.
[56]
S. Singh and M. C. Singh, “Morphometric analysis of Kanhar river basin,” National Geographical Journal of India, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 1997.
[57]
D. Waugh, Geography, An Integrated Approach, Nelson, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
[58]
J. M. Harlin, “Statistical moments of the hypsometric curve and its density function,” Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 59–72, 1978.
[59]
J. M. Harlin, “The effect of precipitation variability on drainage basin morphometry,” American Journal of Science, vol. 280, no. 8, pp. 812–825, 1980.
[60]
W. Luo, “Quantifying groundwater-sapping landforms with a hypsometric technique,” Journal of Geophysical Research E: Planets, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 1685–1694, 2000.
