全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Inclusion Properties of Certain Subclasses of -Valent Functions Associated with the Integral Operator

DOI: 10.1155/2014/749251

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The purpose of the present paper is to introduce two subclasses of -valent functions by using the integral operator and to investigate various properties for these subclasses. 1. Introduction Let denote the class of functions of the following form: which are analytic and -valent in the open unit disc . Let be the class of functions analytic in satisfying and The class was introduced by Aouf [1] and we note the following:(i)the class was introduced by Padmanabhan and Parvatham [2];(ii)the class was introduced by Pinchuk [3];(iii) is the class of functions with positive real part greater than ;(iv) is the class of functions with positive real part greater than ;(v) is the class of functions with positive real part. From (1), we have if and only if there exists such that It is known that [4] the class is a convex set. Motivated essentially by Jung et al. [5], Liu and Owa [6] introduced the integral operator as follows: For given by (1) and then from (4), we deduce that It is easily verified from (5) that (see [6]) We note that (i) the one-parameter family of integral operator was defined by Jung et al. [5] and studied by Aouf [7] and Gao et al. [8]. (ii) Consider where the operator is the generalized Bernardi-Libera-Livingston integral operator (see [9]). We have the following known subclasses and of the class for , , and which are defined by Next, by using the integral operator , we introduce the following classes of analytic functions for and : We also note that In particular, we set and . The following lemma will be required in our investigation. Lemma 1 (see [10]). Let and and let be a complex-valued function satisfying the following conditions:(i) is continuous in a domain ;(ii) and ;(iii) whenever and . If is analytic in such that and for , then in . Lemma 2 (see [11]). Let be analytic in with and ,?? . Then, for and , where is given by and this radius is the best possible. Lemma 3 (see [12]). Let be convex and let be starlike in . Then, for analytic in with , is contained in the convex hull of . In this paper, we obtain several inclusion properties of the classes and associated with the operator . 2. Main Results Unless otherwise mentioned, we assume throughout this paper that , , , , and . Theorem 4. One has Proof. We begin by setting where is analytic in with , . Using the identity (6) in (14) and differentiating the resulting equation with respect to , we obtain This implies that We form the functional by choosing and : Clearly, the first two conditions of Lemma 1 are satisfied. Now, we verify condition (iii) as follows: Therefore applying Lemma

References

[1]  M. K. Aouf, “A generalization of functions with real part bounded in the mean on the unit disc,” Mathematica Japonica, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 175–182, 1988.
[2]  K. S. Padmanabhan and R. Parvatham, “Properties of a class of functions with bounded boundary rotation,” Annales Polonici Mathematici, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 311–323, 1975.
[3]  B. Pinchuk, “Functions of bounded boundary rotation,” Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 10, pp. 7–16, 1971.
[4]  K. I. Noor, “On subclasses of close-to-convex functions of higher order,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 279–290, 1992.
[5]  I. B. Jung, Y. C. Kim, and H. M. Srivastava, “The Hardy space of analytic functions associated with certain one-parameter families of integral operators,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 138–147, 1993.
[6]  J.-L. Liu and S. Owa, “Properties of certain integral operator,” International Journal of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 69–75, 2004.
[7]  M. K. Aouf, “Inequalities involving certain integral operators,” Journal of Mathematical Inequalities, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 537–547, 2008.
[8]  C.-Y. Gao, S.-M. Yuan, and H. M. Srivastava, “Some functional inequalities and inclusion relationships associated with certain families of integral operators,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 49, no. 11-12, pp. 1787–1795, 2005.
[9]  J. H. Choi, M. Saigo, and H. M. Srivastava, “Some inclusion properties of a certain family of integral operators,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 276, no. 1, pp. 432–445, 2002.
[10]  S. S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu, “Second-order differential inequalities in the complex plane,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 289–305, 1978.
[11]  S. Ruscheweyh and V. Singh, “On certain extremal problems for functions with positive real part,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 329–334, 1976.
[12]  St. Ruscheweyh and T. Sheil-Small, “Hadamard products of Schlicht functions and the Pólya-Schoenberg conjecture,” Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, vol. 48, pp. 119–135, 1973.

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133