全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Some Definition of Hartley-Hilbert and Fourier-Hilbert Transforms in a Quotient Space of Boehmians

DOI: 10.1155/2014/790161

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

We investigate the Hartley-Hilbert and Fourier-Hilbert transforms on a quotient space of Boehmians. The investigated transforms are well-defined and linear mappings in the space of Boehmians. Further properties are also obtained. 1. Introduction The Hilbert transform of a function via the Hartley transform is defined in [1, 2] as where and are, respectively, the even and odd components of the Hartley transform given as [3] where . Let be a casual function; that is, , for , and then and are related by a Hilbert transform pair as [3] The Hilbert transform of via the Fourier transform is defined by where and are, respectively, the real and imaginary components of the Fourier transform given as The Hartley transform is extended to Boehmians in [4] and to strong Boehmians in [5]. The Hartley-Hilbert and Fourier-Hilbert transforms were discussed in various spaces of distributions and spaces of Boehmians in [1, 6]. In this paper, aim at investigating the Hartley-Hilbert transform on the context of Boehmians. Investigating the later transform is analogous. 2. Spaces of Quotients (Spaces of Boehmians) One of the most youngest generalizations of functions and more particularly of distributions is the theory of Boehmians. The idea of the construction of Boehmians was initiated by the concept of regular operators [7]. Regular operators form a subalgebra of the field of Mikusinski operators and they include only such functions whose support is bounded from the left. In a concrete case, the space of Boehmians contains all regular operators, all distributions, and some objects which are neither operators nor distributions. The construction of Boehmians is similar to the construction of the field of quotients and, in some cases, it gives just the field of quotients. On the other hand, the construction is possible where there are zero divisors, such as space (the space of continuous functions) with the operations of pointwise additions and convolution. A number of integral transforms have been extended to Boehmian spaces in the recent past by many authors such as Roopkumar in [8, 9]; Mikusinski and Zayed in [10]; Al-Omari and Kilicman in [1, 6, 11]; Karunakaran and Vembu [12]; Karunakaran and Roopkumar [13]; Al-Omari et al. in [14]; and many others. For abstract construction of Boehmian spaces we refer to [14–16]. By denote the Mellin-type convolution product of first kind defined by [8] Properties of are presented as follows [8]:(i);(ii);(iii); is complex number;(iv). By , we denote the convolution product defined by By denote the space of test functions of bounded

References

[1]  S. K. Q. Al-Omari and A. K?l??man, “Some remarks on the extended Hartley-Hilbert and Fourier-Hilbert transforms of boehmians,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 348701, 6 pages, 2013.
[2]  N. Sundararajan and Y. Srinivas, “Fourier-Hilbert versus Hartley-Hilbert transforms with some geophysical applications,” Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 157–161, 2010.
[3]  R. P. Millane, “Analytical properties of the Hartley transform and their implications,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 413–428, 1994.
[4]  S. K. Al-Omari and A. K?l??man, “On diffraction Fresnel transforms for Boehmians,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2011, Article ID 712746, 11 pages, 2011.
[5]  S. K. Al-Omari, “Hartley transforms on a certain space of generalized functions,” Georgian Mathematical Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 415–426, 2013.
[6]  S. K. Q. Al-Omari and A. Kilicman, “On the generalized Hartley-Hilbert and Fourier-Hilbert transforms,” Advances in Difference Equations, vol. 2012, article 232, 2012.
[7]  T. K. Boehme, “The support of Mikusiński operators,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 176, pp. 319–334, 1973.
[8]  R. Roopkumar, “Mellin transform for Boehmians,” Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics: Academia Sinica: New Series, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 75–96, 2009.
[9]  R. Roopkumar, “Generalized Radon transform,” Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1375–1390, 2006.
[10]  P. Mikusinski and A. Zayed, “The Radon transform of Boehmians,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 561–570, 1993.
[11]  S. K. Al-Omari and A. Kilicman, “Note on Boehmians for class of optical Fresnel wavelet transforms,” Journal of Function Spaces and Applications, vol. 2021, Article ID 405368, 14 pages, 2012.
[12]  V. Karunakaran and R. Vembu, “Hilbert transform on periodic boehmians,” Houston Journal of Mathematics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 437–454, 2003.
[13]  V. Karunakaran and R. Roopkumar, “Operational calculus and Fourier transform on Boehmians,” Colloquium Mathematicum, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 2005.
[14]  S. K. Al-Omari, D. Loonker, P. K. Banerji, and S. L. Kalla, “Fourier sine (cosine) transform for ultradistributions and their extensions to tempered and ultraBoehmian spaces,” Integral Transforms and Special Functions, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 453–462, 2008.
[15]  P. Mikusinski, “Tempered Boehmians and ultradistributions,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 813–817, 1995.
[16]  R. S. Pathak, Integral Transforms of Generalized Functions and Their Applications, Gordon and Breach Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133