全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Inherent Difference in Saliency for Generators with Different PM Materials

DOI: 10.1155/2014/567896

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The inherent differences between salient and nonsalient electrical machines are evaluated for two permanent magnet generators with different configurations. The neodymium based (NdFeB) permanent magnets (PMs) in a generator are substituted with ferrite magnets and the characteristics of the NdFeB generator and the ferrite generator are compared through FEM simulations. The NdFeB generator is a nonsalient generator, whereas the ferrite machine is a salient-pole generator, with small saliency. The two generators have almost identical properties at rated load operation. However, at overload the behaviour differs between the two generators. The salient-pole, ferrite generator has lower maximum torque than the NdFeB generator and a larger voltage drop at high current. It is concluded that, for applications where overload capability is important, saliency must be considered and the generator design adapted according to the behaviour at overload operation. Furthermore, if the maximum torque is the design criteria, additional PM mass will be required for the salient-pole machine. 1. Introduction The material most commonly used as permanent magnets (PMs) in electrical machines is neodymium-iron-boron, Nd2Fe14B (shortened as NdFeB). During the last five years the price for NdFeB has increased and fluctuated extremely. In addition, 97% of all mining currently occurs in China and the export quotas for rare-earth metals from China are politically controlled [1]. Furthermore, the environmental aspects of rare-earth metal are an issue. Therefore, the idea to substitute NdFeB with ferrites has been suggested [2] and tested [3]. Several theoretical comparisons of generators with NdFeB and ferrites for wind power generators have previously been performed [2, 4–6]. In most of these studies [4–6] the better magnetic performance of NdFeB is used as an argument for its advantage. However, when the availability and unstable price development for NdFeB are considered, ferrites are considered superior, especially for applications where the weight increase is of less importance [2]. NdFeB generators have been extensively studied [7, 8]. In wind turbines, variable speed operation is increasingly popular. Therefore, the behaviour of a permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) with NdFeB at variable speed and load has been especially evaluated [9]. When substituting NdFeB with ferrites, very similar characteristics can be found at the nominal operating point [2]. However, the intrinsic difference between these two generator types was not considered in [2]; that is, the

References

[1]  C. Hurst, China’s Rare Earth Elements Industry: What Can the West Learn, Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, Potomac, Md, USA, 2010, http://www.iags.org/rareearth0310hurst.pdf.
[2]  S. Eriksson and H. Bernhoff, “Rotor design for PM generators reflecting the unstable neodymium price,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM '12), pp. 1419–1423, September 2012.
[3]  B. Ekerg?rd, Full Scale Applications of Permanent Magnet Electromagnetic Energy Converters, Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala, Sweden, 2013.
[4]  T. Sun, S.-O. Kwon, J.-J. Lee, and J.-P. Hong, “Investigation and comparison of system efficiency on the PMSM considering Nd-Fe-B magnet and ferrite magnet,” in Proceedings of the 31st International Telecommunications Energy Conference (INTELEC '09), pp. 1–6, October 2009.
[5]  A. M. Mihai, S. Benelghali, L. Livadaru, A. Simion, and R. Outbib, “FEM analysis upon significance of different permanent magnet types used in a five-phase PM generator for gearless small-scale wind,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM '12), pp. 267–273, September 2012.
[6]  M. R. J. Dubois, Optimized permanent magnet generator topologies for direct-drive wind turbines [Ph.D. thesis], Delft University, 2004.
[7]  P. Lampola, Directly driven, low-speed permanent-magnet generators for wind power applications [Ph.D. thesis], Department of Electrical Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, 2000.
[8]  A. Grauers, Design of direct driven permanent magnet generators for wind turbines [Ph.D. thesis], Department of Electric Power Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 1996.
[9]  S. Eriksson and H. Bernhoff, “Loss evaluation and design optimisation for direct driven permanent magnet synchronous generators for wind power,” Applied Energy, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 265–271, 2011.
[10]  G. J. M. Darrieus, “Turbine having its rotating shaft transverse to the flow of the current,” U.S. Patent 1.835.018, 1931.
[11]  S. Eriksson, H. Bernhoff, and M. Leijon, “Evaluation of different turbine concepts for wind power,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1419–1434, 2008.
[12]  S. Eriksson, H. Bernhoff, and M. Leijon, “A 225?kW direct driven PM generator adapted to a vertical axis wind turbine,” Advances in Power Electronics, vol. 2011, Article ID 239061, 7 pages, 2011.
[13]  J. Kjellin, S. Eriksson, and H. Bernhoff, “Electric control substituting pitch control for large wind turbines,” Journal of Wind Energy, vol. 2013, Article ID 342061, 4 pages, 2013.
[14]  N. R. Bianchi, S. Bolognani, and B. J. Chalmers, “Salient-rotor PM synchronous motors for an extended flux-weakening operation range,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1118–1125, 2000.
[15]  R. H. Moncada, J. A. Tapia, and T. M. Jahns, “Analysis of negative-saliency permanent-magnet machines,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 122–127, 2010.
[16]  Anon. 1. Ace, “Modified Version 3.1, ABB common platform for field analysis and simulations,” ABB Corporate Research Centre, V?ster?s , Sweden.
[17]  S. Eriksson, A. Solum, M. Leijon, and H. Bernhoff, “Simulations and experiments on a 12?kW direct driven PM synchronous generator for wind power,” Renewable Energy, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 674–681, 2008.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133