全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Lower Troposphere Observation over Urban Area with Lidar at 1064?nm

DOI: 10.1155/2011/769264

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

An episode of relatively thick (till 3?km) aerosol formation over the urban area of Sofia city was observed by lidar at a wavelength of 1064?nm. The lidar is part of Sofia lidar station at the Institute of Electronics of Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Analysis of the weather conditions during the measurement period explains the stable persistence of such formation of human-activity aerosol over the town for the days of observation 20, 21, 23, and 24 June, 2011. The estimated top of the Planetary Boundary Layer for the measurement dated 23 June showed unusually high altitude 2200?m above ground. The results are presented in terms of vertical atmospheric backscatter coefficient profiles and color maps of the aerosol stratification evolution. 1. Introduction Aerosols are of central importance for global climate, atmospheric chemistry and physics, hydrological cycle and biosphere, ecosystems, and public health. Due to their short lifetime and strong tropospheric interactions, their global concentrations and properties are poorly known [1]. Aerosol particles affect atmospheric radiation and cloud microphysics and are considered a major uncertainty in climate changes. The term “atmospheric aerosol” encompasses a wide range of particle types having different compositions, sizes, shapes, and optical properties. Aerosols may be liquid or solid particles suspended in the air with typical diameters ranging over four orders of magnitude (approximately from a few nanometers to a few tens of micrometers). They consist of inorganic and organic components and varying amounts of water. Atmospheric particles are emitted from a variety of natural and human processes. On a global basis, the bulk of aerosols originate from natural sources, mainly sea salt, desert and soil dust, wildfire smoke, and volcanic ash [2, 3]. At present, the quantity of anthropogenic emissions increases with alarming speed. This is associated with a growing economy, rapid urban expansion, increasing rate of motorization, expanding industrial activity, and so forth. Human-produced particles can be dominant form of aerosol in highly populated and industrialized regions and in areas of intense agricultural burning. They are also tightly linked to problems of visibility reduction, acid rain, and smog in many industrial areas of the world. Anthropogenic aerosols are transported by prevailing winds, and the elements contained in them are redeposited often on the surface of the Earth far away from the location that they were produced [4–8]. The natural background aerosol is present in the absence of human

References

[1]  P. Forster, et al., “Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change,” in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
[2]  J. Gasteiger, S. Grob?, V. Freudenthaler, and M. Wiegner, “Volcanic ash from Iceland over Munich: mass concentration retrieved from ground-based remote sensing measurements,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 2209–2223, 2011.
[3]  A. Papayannis, V. Amiridis, L. Mona et al., “Systematic lidar observations of Saharan dust over Europe in the frame of EARLINET (2000–2002),” Journal of Geophysical Research D, vol. 113, no. 10, Article ID D10204, 17 pages, 2008.
[4]  J. E. Penner, et al., “Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change,” in Climate Change 2001: The Physical Scientific Basis, B. Nyenzi and J. Prospero, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001.
[5]  U.S. Climate Change Science Program, “Aerosol properties and climate impacts,” in Synthesis and Assessment Product, M. Chin, R. Kahn, and S. Schwartz, Eds., 2009, http://downloads.climatescience.gov.
[6]  U. P?schl, “Atmospheric aerosols: composition, transformation, climate and health effects,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 44, no. 46, pp. 7522–7540, 2005.
[7]  P. Stier, J. Feichter, E. Roeckner, S. Kloster, and M. Esch, “The evolution of the global aerosol system in a transient climate simulation from 1860 to 2100,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 3059–3076, 2006.
[8]  R. L. Miller and I. Tegen, “Climate response to soil dust aerosols,” Journal of Climate, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 3247–3267, 1998.
[9]  N. Sabbagh-Kupelwieser, H. Horvath, and W. W. Szymanski, “Urban aerosol studies of PM1 size fraction with reference to ambient conditions and visibility,” Aerosol and Air Quality Research, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 425–432, 2010.
[10]  E. Katragkou, S. Kazadzis, V. Amiridis, V. Papaioannou, S. Karathanasis, and D. Melas, “PM10 regional transport pathways in Thessaloniki, Greece,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1079–1085, 2009.
[11]  M. Tasi?, S. Raj?i?, Z. Miji?, et al., “Atmospheric aerosols and their influence on air quality in urban areas,” Facta Universitatis, vol. 4, pp. 83–90, 2006.
[12]  L. Perez, A. Tobias, X. Querol et al., “Coarse particles from saharan dust and daily mortality,” Epidemiology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 800–807, 2008.
[13]  EARLINET (European Aerosol Research Lidar Network), http://www.earlinet.org/.
[14]  S. Guibert, V. Matthias, M. Schulz et al., “The vertical distribution of aerosol over Europe—synthesis of one year of EARLINET aerosol lidar measurements and aerosol transport modeling with LMDzT-INCA,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 39, no. 16, pp. 2933–2943, 2005.
[15]  A. Deleva, A Slesar, and S. Denisov, “Investigations of the aerosol fields and clouds in the troposphere with Raman-aerosol lidar,” Bulgarian Geophysical Journal, vol. 36, pp. 25–39, 2010.
[16]  A. D. Deleva, I. V. Grigorov, L. A. Avramov, V. A. Mitev, A. S. Slesar, and S. Denisov, “Raman-elastic-backscatter lidar for observations of tropospheric aerosol,” in Proceedings of 15th SPIE International Scool on Quantum Electronics: Lasers-Physics and Applications, vol. 7027, pp. 70270Y-1–70270Y-8, 2008.
[17]  J. D. Klett, “Stable analytical inversion solution for processing lidar returns,” Applied Optics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 211–220, 1981.
[18]  F. G. Fernald, “Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments,” Applied Optics, vol. 23, pp. 652–653, 1984.
[19]  Y Sasano, E. Browell, and S. Ismail, “Error caused by using constant extinction/backscattering ratio in the lidar solution,” Applied Optics, vol. 24, pp. 3929–3932, 1985.
[20]  J. Boesenberg and V. Matthias, “A European aerosol research lidar network to establish an aerosol climatology,” MPI-Report 348, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, 2003.
[21]  C. B?ckmann, U. Wandinger, A. Ansmann et al., “Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 2. Aerosol backscatter algorithms,” Applied Optics, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 977–989, 2004.
[22]  Quicklooks of Sofia lidar station, http://www.ie-bas.dir.bg/Departments/LidarData/Quicklooks.htm/.
[23]  DREAM (Dust Regional Atmospheric Model) model access via Barcelona Supercomputing Center, http://www.bsc.es/projects/earthscience/DREAM/.
[24]  R. R. Draxler and G. D. Rolph, HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD, http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php.
[25]  G. D. Rolph, Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstem (READY). NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD, http://ready.arl.noaa.gov.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133