Chen J L, Wilson C R, Swo K W. 2006. Optimized smoothing of gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE) time-variable gravity observations. J Geophys Res, 111: B06408, doi: 10.1029/2005JB004064
[5]
Ditmar P, Teixeira da encarnacao J, Hashemi F H. 2011. Understanding data noise in gravity field recovery on the basis of inter-satellite ranging measurements acquired by the satellite gravimetry mission GRACE. J Geodesy, 86: 441-465
[6]
Elsaka B. 2010. Simulated satellite formation flights for detecting temporal variations of the earth’s gravity field. Ph.D. Dissertation. Germary: University of Bonn
[7]
Han S C, Jekeli C, Shum C K. 2004. Time-variable aliasing effects of ocean tides, atmosphere, and continental water mass on monthly mean GRACE gravity field. J Geophys Res, 109: B04403, doi: 10.1029/2003JB002501
[8]
Jekeli C. 1996. Spherical harmonic analysis aliasing and filtering. J Geodesy, 70: 214-223
[9]
Kim J. 2000. Simulation Study of A Low-Low Satellite-to-Satellite Tracking Mission. Doctoral Dissertation. Austin: University of Texas
[10]
Klees R, Revtova E A, Gunter B C, et al. 2008. The design of an optimal filter for monthly GRACE gravity models. Geophys J Int, 175: 417-432
[11]
Kurtenbach E, Mayer-Gurr T, Eicker A. 2009. Deriving daily snapshots of the Earth’s gravity field from GRACE L1B data using Kalman filtering. Geophys Res Lett, 36: L17102, doi: 10.1029/2009GL039564
[12]
Loomis B D, Nerem R S, Luthcke S B. 2012. Simulation study of a follow-on gravity mission to GRACE. J Geodesy, 86: 319-335
[13]
Lyard F, Lefevre F, Letellier T, et al. 2006. Modelling the global ocean tides: Modern insights from FES2004. Ocean Dyn, 56: 394-415
[14]
Ray R D, Luthcke S B. 2006. Tide model errors and GRACE gravimetry: Towards a more realistic assessment. Geophys J Int, 167: 1055-1059
[15]
Savcenko R, Bosch W. 2008. EOT08a-empirical ocean tide model from multi-mission satellite altimetry. Report No.81. Deutsches Geodatisches Forschungsinstitut (DGFI), Munchen, Germany
[16]
Seo K W, Wilson C R, Han S C, et al. 2008a. Gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE) alias error from ocean tides. J Geophys Res, 113: B03405, doi: 10.1029/ 2006JB004747
[17]
Seo K W, Wilson C R, Chen J L, et al. 2008b. GRACE’s spatial aliasing error. Geophys J Int, 172: 41-48
[18]
Sneeuw N, Flury J, Rummel R. 2005. Science requirements on future missions and simulated mission scenarios. Earth Moon Planets, 94: 113-142
[19]
Tapley B D, Bettadpur S, Ries J C, et al. 2004. GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system. Science, 305: 503-505
[20]
Visser P, Sneeuw N, Reubelt T, et al. 2010. Space-borne gravimetric satellite constellations and ocean tides: Aliasing effects. Geophys J Int, 181: 789-805
[21]
Wahr J, Molenaar M, Bryan F. 1998. Time variablility of the Earth’s gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE. J Geophys Res, 103: 30205-30229
[22]
Wahr J, Swenson S, Zlotnicki V, et al. 2004. Time-variable gravity from GRACE: First results. Geophys Res Lett, 31: L11501, doi: 10.1029/2004GL019779
[23]
Watkins M, Sprague G, Case K, et al. 2008. Time Variable Gravity Mapping Mission (Grace Follow-On/Grace Ⅱ) Study. In: GRACE Science Team Meeting. 237-250
[24]
Wiese D N, Folkner W M , Nerem R S. 2009. Alternative mission architectures for a gravity recovery satellite mission. J Geodesy, 83: 569-581
[25]
Wiese D N, Visser P, Nerem R S. 2011. Estimating low resolution gravity fields at short time intervals to reduce temporal aliasing errors. Adv Space Res, 48: 1094-1107
[26]
Zenner L, Gruber T, J？ggi A, et al. 2010. Propogation of atmospheric model errors to gravity potential harmonics-impact on GRACE de-aliasing. Geophys J Int, 182: 797-807
