全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

2014年8月3日云南鲁甸M6.5地震破裂方向性研究

, PP. 253-263

Keywords: 破裂方向性,震源机制解,鲁甸地震

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

?2014年8月3日云南鲁甸发生了M6.5地震,造成了严重的人员伤亡与经济损失.基于近震波形CAP方法反演得到的震源机制解表明此次地震主要为走滑型地震,两个断层节面的走向分别为70°及160°左右.由于震源区构造复杂,分布着不同尺度及走向的断层,仅根据地震断层面解难以确认发生破裂的实际断层.利用主震和参考地震之间的P波到时差及CAP反演过程中得到的时移信息,测量得到了鲁甸地震质心位置与破裂起始位置的差异,确定了地震断层面解中走向为160°的节面为真实破裂面.本文得到的鲁甸地震破裂方向性可为进一步研究该震发震成因提供参考.

References

[1]  何斌, 徐义刚, 肖龙, 等. 2003. 峨眉山大火成岩省的形成机制及空间展布: 来自沉积地层学的新证据. 地质学报, 77: 194-202
[2]  罗艳, 倪四道, 曾祥方, 等. 2011. 一个发生在沉积盖层里的破坏性地震: 2010年1月31日四川遂宁-重庆潼南地震. 科学通报, 56: 147-152
[3]  秦刘冰, 倪四道, 陈伟文, 等. 2014. 基于相对质心震中的地震破裂方向性测定方法研究: 以2008年云南盈江M6.0地震为例. 地球物理学报, 57: 3259-3269
[4]  苏金蓉, 郑钰, 杨建思, 等. 2013. 2013年4月20日四川芦山M7.0级地震与余震精确定位及发震构造初探. 地球物理学报, 56: 2636-2644
[5]  王未来, 吴建平, 房立华, 等. 2014. 2014年云南鲁甸Ms6.5地震序列的双差定位. 地球物理学报, 57: 3042-3051
[6]  王卫民, 赵连锋, 李娟, 等. 2005. 1999年台湾集集地震震源破裂过程. 地球物理学报, 48: 132-147
[7]  王卫民, 赵连锋, 李娟, 等. 2008. 四川汶川8.0级地震震源过程. 地球物理学报, 51: 1403-1410
[8]  徐锡伟, 江国焰, 于贵华, 等. 2014. 鲁甸6.5级地震发震断层判定及其构造属性讨论. 地球物理学报, 57:3060-3068
[9]  徐锡伟, 闻学泽, 叶建青, 等. 2008. 汶川Ms8.0地震地表破裂带及其发震构造. 地震地质, 30: 597-629
[10]  徐锡伟, 闻学泽, 郑荣章, 等. 2003. 川滇地区活动块体最新构造变动样式及其动力来源. 中国科学D辑: 地球科学, 33(增刊Ⅰ): 151-162
[11]  徐锡伟, 赵伯明, 马胜利, 等. 2011. 活动断层地震灾害预测方法与应用. 北京: 科学出版社
[12]  张军龙, 陈长云, 胡朝忠, 等. 2010. 玉树Ms7.1地震地表破裂带及其同震位移分布. 地震, 30: 1-12
[13]  张勇, 冯万鹏, 许力生, 等. 2008. 2008年汶川大地震的时空破裂过程. 中国科学D辑: 地球科学, 38: 1186-1194
[14]  Boatwright J. 2007. The persistence of directivity in small earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 97: 1850-1861
[15]  Bodin P, Horton S. 2004. Source parameters and tectonic implications of aftershocks of the Mw7.6 Bhuj earthquake of 26 January 2001. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 94: 818-827
[16]  Chen P, Jordan T H, Zhao L. 2005. Finite-moment tensor of the 3 September 2002 Yorba Linda earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 95: 1170-1180
[17]  Dawson J, Cummins P, Tregoning P, et al. 2008. Shallow intraplate earthquakes in Western Australia observed by interferometric synthetic aperture radar. J Geophys Res, 113: B11408
[18]  Han L B, Zeng X F, Jiang C S, et al. 2014. Focal mechanisms of the 2013 Mw6.6 Lushan, China earthquake and high-resolution aftershock relocations. Seismol Res Lett, 85: 8-14
[19]  Hsieh M C, Zhao L, Ma K F. 2014. Efficient waveform inversion for average earthquake rupture in three-dimensional structures. Geophys J Int, 198: 1279-1292
[20]  Ji C, Wald D J, Helmberger D. 2002. Source description of the 1999 Hector Mine, California, earthquake, part I: Wavelet domain inversion theory and resolution analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 92: 1192-1207
[21]  Klein F W. 2007. User’s Guide to HYPOINVERSE-2000: A fortran program to solve for earthquake locations and magnitudes. US Geological Survey Open-File Report. 36-40
[22]  Langston C A. 1987. Depth of faulting during the 1968 Meckering, Australia, earthquake sequence determined from waveform analysis of local seismogram. J Geophs Res, 92: 11561-11574
[23]  Lee J C, Chan Y C. 2007. Structure of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake rupture and interaction of thrust faults in the active fold belt of western Taiwan. J Asian Earth Sci, 31: 226-239
[24]  Li Z H, Feng W P, Xu Z H, et al. 2008. The 1998 Mw5.7 Zhangbei-Shangyi (China) earthquake revisited: A buried thrust fault revealed with interferometric synthetic aperture radar. Geochem Geophys Geosyst, 9: Q04026
[25]  Li Z W, Tian B F, Liu S, et al. 2013. Asperity of the 2013 Lushan earthquake in the eastern margin of Tibetan Plateau from seismic tomography and aftershock relocation. Geophys J Int, 195: 1279-1292
[26]  Luo Y, Tan Y, Wei S J, et al. 2010. Source mechanism and rupture directivity of the 18 May 2009 Mw4.6 Inglewood, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 100: 3269-3277
[27]  Somerville P, Collins N, Abrahamson N, et al. 2011. Ground motion attenuation relations for the central and eastern United States. Report to the U.S. Geological Survey. Grant No. 99HQGR0098
[28]  Tan Y, Helmberger D. 2010. Rupture directivity characteristics of the 2003 Big Bear sequence. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 100: 1089-1106
[29]  Thio H K, Kanamori H. 1996. Source complexity of the 1994 Northridge earthquake and its relation to aftershock mechanisms. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 86: 84-92
[30]  Wei S J, Ni S D, Zha X J, et al. 2011. Source model of the 11th July 2004 Zhongba earthquake revealed from the joint inversion of InSAR and seismological data. Earthq Sci, 24: 207-220
[31]  Zhao L S, Helmberger D. 1994. Source estimation from broadband regional seismograms. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 84: 91-104
[32]  Zhu L P, Rivera L A. 2002. A note on the dynamic and static displacements from a point source in multilayered media. Geophys J Int, 148: 619-627
[33]  Yeats R S, Sieh K E, Allen C R, et al. 1997. The Geology of Earthquakes. New York: Oxford University Press

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133