全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
地理学报  2015 

拉萨八廓街地方性的游客认同建构

DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201510008, PP. 1632-1663

Keywords: 地方性,游客认同,八廓街,扎根理论,理论建构,量表开发,拉萨

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

地方性作为地方群体的主观创作,其结构随认同群体的差异而发生变化。为了初步探索地方性认同的组成结构,选择拉萨八廓街为案例地,从游客视角出发,通过理论建构和实证检验的研究思路,对拉萨八廓街的地方性展开实证分析。研究发现地方性游客认同探索性理论模型包括识觉空间、生活空间和主体空间3个主范畴以及自然独特性、人文独特性、自我效能、环境可管理性、一致性、依恋和自我尊重等7个副范畴;研究所开发的地方性游客认同量表包含7个维度共计23个问项,量表整体结构良好,具有较好的稳定性和鉴别度;游客对拉萨八廓街地方性认同整体持积极态度,其中,识觉空间平均分最高,生活空间次之,而以主体空间得分最低;依据5种不同的理论结构设计成的5种竞争模型,经过验证性因子分析进行模型选择,并通过聚合效度与区分效度对所选模型加以验证,认为模型5是地方性游客认同的最佳模型,同时证明了探索性模型建构的正确性。此外,文章还对拉萨八廓街地方性的游客认同这一概念使用的理论渊源及其与重点相关概念的关系,以及概念模型建构的深化进行了讨论。

References

[1]  TuanYF.SpaceandPlace:ThePerspectiveofExperience.E.Arnold,1977.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/37705265_Space_And_Place_The_Perspective_of_ExperienceOnthe25thanniversaryofitspublication,aneweditionofthisfoundationalworkonhumangeography.Inthetwentyyearssinceitsoriginalpublication,SpaceandPlacehasnotonlyestablishedthedisciplineofhumangeography,butithasproveninfluentialinsuchdiversefieldsastheatre,literature,anthropology,psychology,andtheology.EminentgeographerYi-FuTuanconsidersthewaysinwhichpeoplefeelandthinkaboutspace,howtheyformattachmentstohome,neighborhood,andnation,andhowfeelingsaboutspaceandplaceareaffectedbythesenseoftime.Hesuggeststhatplaceissecurityandspaceisfreedom:weareattachedtotheoneandlongfortheother.Whetherheisconsideringsacredversus"biased"space,mythicalspaceandplace,timeinexperientialspace,orculturalattachmentstospace,Tuan'sanalysisisthoughtfulandinsightfulthroughout.Untilretiringin1998,Yi-FuTuanwasaprofessorofgeographyattheUniversityofWisconsin-Madison.Heisrankedamongthecountry'smostdistinguishedculturalgeographersandhasearnednumeroushonors,amongthemaGuggenheimFellowship,theBrackenAwardforlandscapearchitecture,andanawardformeritoriouscontributiontogeographyfromtheAssociationofAmericanGeographers.HewasrecentlynamedtheLaur脙聝脗漏atd'Honneur2000oftheInternationalGeographersUnion.Heistheauthorofmanyessaysandbooks,includingEscapism(1998)andCosmosandHearth(1999),andDearColleague.DOI:10.2307/1574234
[2]  RelphE.PlaceandPlaceness.London:Pion,1976.http://xueshu.baidu.com/link?url=C9Ho3tQB0ROMNNQ4Loc1AFPeKS2XEZcdCvb2d_91c7lWJIuWP9Uor9N_LzjJc1QrKKrsSb3GMnjoXKKzHhthsxPz4XbahS_shikvVkA480i3SYmINu8QjWFuiwk4yhj59WsQATfSynShLPqCF64Jbw1xnyFHTM8SE3gBSpQCDI7hRhkltFRXVWiTNBmC8BRhoVnHFPBT_NPTvSp8IFb4XuboB4do9NsY9tL-jdVYpweuXnndkiKCdb-C49WMStYF&wd=Place%20and%20Placeness
[3]  SeamonD.AGeographyoftheLifeworld.NewYork:StMartin'sPress,1979.
[4]  PredA.Place,practice,andstructure:SocialandspatialtransformationinsouthernSweden,1750-1850.Totowa,N.J:Barnes&Noble,1986.
[5]  AgnewJ.PlaceandPolitics:TheGeographicalMediationofStateandSociety.Boston:AllenandUnwin,1987.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/238788067_Place_and_politics_The_geographical_mediation_of_state_and_societyAnacademicdirectoryandsearchengine.
[6]  LiuJunzhi.Anexploratorystudyofresidentandtourists'placeattachmenttowardtoLiyuLakeinHualien[D].Hualien:NationalDongHwaUniversity,2004.[刘俊志.居民与游客对于鲤鱼潭风景特定区之地方依附差异探讨[D].花莲:国立东华大学,2004.]
[7]  HuangXiumei.Localculturalactivitiesandplaceidentity[D].Tainan:TainanTeachersCollege,2003.[黄琇玫.地方文化活动与地方认同[D].台南:台南师范学院,2003.]
[8]  LowM.Symbolictiesthatbind//AltmanI,LowSM.PlaceAttachment.NewYork:PlenumPress,1992.http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201300713500Instepwiththegrowinginterestinplaceattachment,thisvolumeexaminesthephenomenafromtheperspectiveofseveraldisciplines-includinganthropology,folklore,andpsychology-andpointstowardspromisingdirectionsoffutureresearch.
[9]  ProshanskyM.Thecityandself-identity.EnvironmentandBehavior,1978,10:147-169.http://xueshu.baidu.com/link?url=49pm11Z8r2t9VHAqdKK63rcTdohFh2D8yB3ZS0QF0N0YtJa8n-gNTo-feNLaOG3o&wd=The%20city%20and%20self-identity
[10]  LalliM.Urban-relatedidentity:Theory,measurement,andempiricalfindings.JournalofEnvironmentalPsychology,1992,12:285-303.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494405800787Onthebasisofacriticalliteraturereview,thefollowingproblemsareseentocharacterizethepsychologicalresearchon‘placeidentity’:heterogeneityoftermsandtheirspatialextension,differingtheoreticalfoundationsandfragmentedformulations,lackofadequatemeasuringinstruments,andascarcityofempiricalwork.Thispaperaimsfirstly,topresentasystematicanalysisofthetheoreticaltraditionsoftheworkon‘placeidentity’.Secondly,itusesconstructsofmediumrangeinordertosystematizetheoryandresearch.Anexampleofthelatterispresentedwithrespecttourban-relatedidentity.Aframeworkforconceptualizingurban-relatedidentityandidentificationisdevelopedonthebasisofsocialpsychologicalworkonself-concept.Thesecondpartintroducesameasuringinstrument(the‘UrbanIdentityScale’),whichoffersanempiricallyusefuloperationalizationofthetheoreticalconsiderationspresentedinthefirstpartofthepaper.Thefindingsofdifferentfieldstudiesillustratetheadvantagesoftheempiricalapproachadoptedandprovideinsightsintoboththeantecedentsofurban-relatedidentityanditsconsequenceswithrespecttoperception,cognitionsandexperienceoftheurbanenvironment.Finally,remainingproblemsandfurtherimplicationsarediscussed.DOI:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80078-7
[11]  SunJiuxia,ZhouYi.Studyonthereproductionofspaceoftourismcommunityfromtheperspectiveofeverydaylife:BasedontheoriesofLefebvreandDeCerteau.ActaGeographicaSinica,2014,69(10):1575-1589.[孙九霞,周一.日常生活视野中的旅游社区空间再生产研究:基于列斐伏尔与德塞图的理论视角.地理学报,2014,69(10):1575-1589.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_dlxb201410015.aspx在空间与旅游地空间的相关研究中,社区居民及其日常生活所扮演的角色未得到充分的重视.而本文试图转向微观层面,关注空间演化中居民与日常生活的力量.研究以世界文化遗产“开平碉楼与村落”核心区马降龙村为例,运用观察法与访谈法,探索由旅游发展所推动的旅游社区空间再生产的现象与特征.基于列斐伏尔的“空间三元论”与德塞图的“日常生活实践”理论,讨论在空间再生产的过程中,居民如何通过日常生活,对抗政府与景区管理主体构想的空间表征,体现具有反抗性的表征空间.研究发现,在日常生活中,反抗性的表征空间表现出嵌入、抵制、进攻性抵制、反噬、再生等形式.现阶段,低度开发水平下居民与政府及景区管理主体的对抗达到一种微妙的平衡状态.长期看来景区组织与居民角色的特性,以及对土地的掌控保障了反抗潜力的延续.而旅游社区的空间秩序最终将在所有旅游利益相关者的协商中形成.旅游发展中居民扮演的角色影响其协商能力,造成不同的行动机制与意义.旅游社区空间活力最终在多主体、多目标的空间生产过程中激发,这一过程始终展现出日常生活的创造力.DOI:10.11821/dlxb201410015
[12]  XieNa.Spaceproductionandculturalrepresentation:Literaturespacefromaperspectiveofspacetheories[D].Shenyang:LiaoningUniversity,2008.[谢纳.空间生产与文化表征:空间理论视域下的文学空间研究[D].沈阳:辽宁大学,2008.]
[13]  ChenCai,LuChangchong.Identity:Anewperspectiveinthestudyoftourismexperience.TourismTribune,2011,26(3):37-42.[陈才,卢昌崇.认同:旅游体验研究的新视角.旅游学刊,2011,26(3):37-42.] 作为旅游现象的内核,旅游体验具有丰富的内涵,可从不同的视角加以诠释。文章从认同角度对旅游体验中的认同(成分)加以诠释,指出在旅游体验中认同呈现出多种形态,从外在的目的地认同,到对旅游者角色认同,再到文化认同,最后到自我认同,呈现出一定的层次性。通过各种形态的认同,旅游体验才能彰显其独特价值。
[14]  GartnerWC.Imageformationprocess.JournalofTravel&TourismMarketing,1993,2(2/3):191-215.
[15]  GaoBW,ZhangH,DecostaPLE.Phantasmaldestination:Apost-modernistperspective.AnnalsofTourismResearch,2012,39(1):197-220.
[16]  FrijdaNH,MansteadASR,BemS.EmotionsandBeliefs:HowFeelingsInfluenceThoughts.StudiesinEmotionandSocialInteraction.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,2000:249.
[17]  DunnRG.IdentityCrisis:ASocialCritiqueofPostmodernity.Minneapolis:UniversityofMinnesotaPress,1998.
[18]  CookI,HobsonK,HallettL,etal.Geographiesoffood:Following.ProgressinHumanGeography,2006,3(5):655-666.http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2093901Thearticletalksaboutthegeographiesoffood.Oneofthetopicsfocusedonfoodgeographersinthebridgingofthedivisionbetweentheagriculturalgeographydominatedbypoliticaleconomyandquantitativemethodsandtheculturalstudiesoffoodliteraturedominatedbypoststructuralismandqualitativeresearch.Thearticlementionsandcommentsonresourcesaboutthegeographiesofproductionandconsumptionoffood.Itdiscussestheneedtodomoreethnographicparticipantobservation,theuseofdifferentapproachestotheoryandempirics,andtheeffectsofconnectiveknowledge.DOI:10.1177/0309132506070183
[19]  HarveyD.Justice,NatureandtheGeographyofDifference.Oxford:BasilBlackwell,1989.
[20]  LightA,SmithJM.PhilosophyandGeographyThree.BostonWay,Maryland:Rowman&LittlefieldPublishers,Inc,1998.http://xueshu.baidu.com/link?url=CJ2ub0RAoTTJv0gHKpFVV4O57YnXyTnLe7hTh5CXFYxBviJCzL82ZnOaUlcXXWdzMGCPZ0aRJyMkWmcVhnqjUrjIHkx5t7OPBC47c6tTRRt_sJZznuzL2IDxCwwJUfixWEUUp0MhzqHeUc1RwNjQ_JhXDzKk6pBaEXl4ZaljtZzBeQM--hMgO8cpXrSw3ArfCQrtD2kaU-L87ZzcouCgEUXUogtkaKU-wWxhzKp8H9QekXYw_9u-nu9b2LvcTZ0b&wd=Philosophy%20and%20Geography%20Three.%20Boston%20Way%2C%20Maryland%3A%20Rowman
[21]  ZengGuojun,LiuMei,LiuBo,etal.Researchonprocesstotranslocalrestaurants'cultureproduction:Basedontheperspectiveofsymbolizationofauthenticity.GeographicalResearch,2013,32(12):2366-2376.[曾国军,刘梅,刘博,等.跨地方饮食文化生产的过程研究:基于符号化的原真性视角.地理研究,2013,32(12):2366-2376.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_dlyj201312018.aspx全球化是去地方化,抑或在全新体系中定义新的地方性、凸显地方性,学术界对此一直存在争论。伴随全球化进程,地方性饮食追逐人口流动跨地方扩展,这些跨地方饮食在保持文化原真性和适应本地顾客需求方面挣扎。如何保持原真性,保持何种原真性成为跨地方饮食文化生产的焦点。本文通过对地方性与跨地方、原真性与符号化的相关研究进行梳理,基于饮食文化原真性的理论分析,揭示了“原真性的符号化”这一跨地方饮食文化生产的重要过程。与此同时,还阐述了在跨地方饮食文化生产过程中,原真性符号化的必然性及其循环过程,旨在为跨地方饮食文化生产提供理论依据和实践指引,同时也有利于理解地方性文化的跨地方传播、创新与发展。DOI:10.11821/dlyj201312030
[22]  TangShunying,ZhouShangyi.Rolesoftextinplacenessconstruction:Analysisoncoreliteratureofculturalgeographyinrecentyears.ScientiaGeographicaSinica,2011,31(10):1159-1165.[唐顺英,周尚意.浅析文本在地方性形成中的作用:对近年文化地理学核心刊物中相关文章的梳理.地理科学,2011,31(10):1159-1165.]http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DLKX201110002.htm新文化地理学是英国一批文化地理学者在1980年代建立起来的知识体系。它与传统文化地理学有所不同,区别之一在于是否关注电影、文学作品、绘画等文本所再现的地方性。近年在英美文化地理学的核心刊物中,许多文章研究了由文本再现出来的地方性。地方性是文化地理学最主要的研究议题之一,它是文化地理学与其他人文地理学分支结合的关键概念。梳理这些文章,旨在归纳出文本在地方性形成中所起的作用。分析结论如下:①文本可以通过再现3种内容来建构地方性:当地的景观、日常生活实践和业已消失的文化;②文本再现地方性的机制多来自人们的意识形态需要,"我"与"他者"的精神诉求不同,再现的地方性也不同;③文本的再现对地方性既会有强化作用,也会有削弱作用。归纳出这种三种结论后,尚需要进一步讨论如下问题:在地方性的形成中,文本的作用是否是或缺的。如果不是或缺的,而是必须的,那么文化地理学者则必须研究文本中再现的地方性。
[23]  CresswellT.Place:AShortIntroduction.London:Blackwell,2004.http://www.geol.utas.edu.au/geography/kga171/KGA172/Module%203/L3.1_Understandings%20of%20place/Cresswell%20Defining%20Place.pdfHumangeographyisthestudyofplaies.Itis,oícourse,manyotherthingübutitLfironaninluitivelevel,adisciplinewhichhas|i]actaítint-ofitsprincipleobjectsof03study.Studentssigningupforgeographydegreesandcourseswilloftensite03heirinlere.slinddfferetll
[24]  SuLiying.Astudyontheinhabitants'placeidentityatCijin[D].Taichung:NationalTaichungUniversity,2010.[苏俐莹.旗津居民地方认同之研究[D].台中:国立台中教育大学,2010.]
[25]  BreakwellM.CopingwithThreatenedIdentity.London:Methuen,1986.
[26]  TangXiaofeng.InterpretationofCulturalGeography:LectureRecording.Beijing:AcademyPress,2012.[唐晓峰.文化地理学释义:大学讲课录.北京:学苑出版社,2012.]
[27]  MasseyDB,JessPM.APlaceintheWorld:Places,CulturesandGlobalization.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPressinAssociationwiththeOpenUniversity,1995.
[28]  TuanYF.Topophilia:AstudyofEnvironmentalPerceptions,Attitudes,andValues.ColumbiaUniversityPress,2013.
[29]  ZhuHong,LiuBo.Conceptsanalysisandresearchimplications:Senseofplace,placeattachmentandplaceidentity.JournalofSouthChinaNormalUniversity(NaturalScienceEdition),2011,43(1):1-8.[朱竑,刘博.地方感、地方依恋与地方认同等概念的辨析及研究启示.华南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2011,43(1):1-8.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_hnsfdx201101001.aspx论文在明确地方感、地方依恋与地方认同概念内涵的基础上,明晰了概念间的关系.研究表明:地方感是一个动态变化的包容性概念,包括地方依恋与地方认同2个维度;地方依恋与地方认同是2个相关但各具独特内涵的概念,研究过程中应对其进行有效区分;地方依恋会影响地方认同,二者都有助于地方感的构建;未来研究中应该从概念构建上突出地方本身的独特性和典型性,研究中应综合运用多种方法,空间上应区分地方感的不同空间尺度,时间上则应强调地方感研究的动态观点.
[30]  HidalgoMC,HernandezB.Placeattachment:Conceptualandempiricalquestions.JournalofEnvironmentalPsychology,2001,21(3):273-281.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s027249440190221x?via=ihubOneofthelimitationsinthestudyofattachmenttoplacehasbeenitsrestrictiontothespatialrangeofneighbourhood.Apartfromsomestudiesanalysingattachmenttohouse,thereisagapregardingotherspatialenvironments.Inthissense,wedonotknowtowhatextentpeoplecanbeattachedtootherspatialcategories,i.e.,tobiggerorsmallerplaces,andwhethertheneighbourhoodrangeiseffectivelythebasiclevelofattachment,asmanystudiesassume.Ontheotherhand,moststudiesonattachmenttoplacehaveviewedplacesassocialenvironmentsonly.Wehavefoundveryfewreferencestothephysicaldimensionofplaceinthedefinitionoftheconceptandalsofewregardingitsoperationalization.Inthisstudy,wemeasuredplaceattachmentwithinthreespatialranges(house,neighbourhood,andcity)andtwodimensions(physicalandsocial),inordertoestablishsomecomparisonbetweenthem.Wedidsobyinterviewing177peoplefromdifferentareasofSantaCruzdeTenerife(Spain).Theresultsindicatethatattachmenttoplacedevelopstodifferentdegreeswithindifferentspatialrangesanddimensions.Amongtheresults,wecanhighlightthat:1)attachmenttoneighbourhoodistheweakest;2)socialattachmentisgreaterthanphysicalattachment;and3)thedegreeofattachmentvarieswithageandsex.DOI:10.1006/jevp.2001.0221
[31]  KyleG,GraefeA,ManningR.Testingthedimensionalityofplaceattachmentinrecreationalsettings.EnvironmentandBehavior,2005,37(2):153-177.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/249624372_Testing_the_Dimensionality_of_Place_Attachment_in_Recreational_SettingsThepurposeofthisinvestigationwastoexaminethepsychometricpropertiesofaplace-attachmentscaleusingdatacollectedfromvisitorstotheAppalachianTrailintheUnitedStates.Thesedatasupportedacorrelatedthree-factormodelconsistingofplaceidentity,placedependence,andsocialbonding.Multigroupconfirmatoryfactoranalysiswasusedtocross-validatethemodelusingtwosub-samplesofthedata.Latentfactormeanswerealsocompared.Althoughtheseanalysesprovidedmixedevidenceindicatingthescaletobeavalidandreliablemeasureofplaceattachment,thereremainssomeconcernabouttheperformanceofseveralindicators(i.e.,lowfactorloadings,lowreliability).Latentmeandifferenceswerealsoobservedbetweenthetwogroupsontheplaceidentitydimension.Theanalysespresentedinthisinvestigationprovideanexampleoftheutilityofcovariancestructureanalysisfortestingthepsychometricpropertiesofscalesandforcomparinglatentmeandifferencesamonggroupswithinpopulations.DOI:10.1177/0013916504269654
[32]  ScannellL,GiffordR.Definingplaceattachment:Atripartiteorganizingframework.JournalofEnvironmentalPsychology,2010,30(1):1-10.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494409000620AbstractPlaceattachmenthasbeenresearchedquitebroadly,andsohasbeendefinedinavarietyofways.Thevariousdefinitionsoftheconceptarereviewedandsynthesizedintoathree-dimensional,person–process–placeorganizingframework.Thepersondimensionofplaceattachmentreferstoitsindividuallyorcollectivelydeterminedmeanings.Thepsychologicaldimensionincludestheaffective,cognitive,andbehavioralcomponentsofattachment.Theplacedimensionemphasizestheplacecharacteristicsofattachment,includingspatiallevel,specificity,andtheprominenceofsocialorphysicalelements.Inaddition,potentialfunctionsofplaceattachmentarereviewed.Theframeworkorganizesrelatedplaceattachmentconceptsandthusclarifiestheterm.Theframeworkmayalsobeusedtostimulatenewresearch,investigatemultidimensionality,createoperationaldefinitionsforquantitativestudies,guidesemi-structuredinterviewsforqualitativestudies,andassistinconflictresolutionforsuccessfulland-usemanagement.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006
[33]  ZhuangCP,ZhangJX.Placeidentity:Analysisfromenvironmentalpsychologyperspective.AdvancesinPsychologicalScience,2011,19(9):1387-1396.[庄春萍,张建新.地方认同:环境心理学视角下的分析.心理科学进展,2011,19(9):1387-1396.]Proshansky提出的“地方认同”(placeidentity,1978)一词,是环境心理学研究中的重要概念。它指的是人对居住环境的自我认同,用于理解和测量“人-地关系”。已有研究分别从认知、情感和行为等方面论证了“地方认同”与“地方依恋”、“地方感”及“地方依赖”等概念之间的区别;并在个体、社会和文化三个层面上均发现了影响地方认同的因素。未来的研究将采用社会认知的实验技术、以及纵向研究设计方法等,一方面探讨地方认同的内在心理机制,另一方面则利用此概念探索解决有关的现实问题。
[34]  BreakwellM.Processesofself-evaluation:Efficacyandestrangement//BreakwellGM.SocialPsychologyofIdentityandtheSelf-concept.Surrey:SurreyUniversityPress,1992.
[35]  KnezI.Attachmentandidentityasrelatedtoplaceanditsperceivedclimate.JournalofEnvironmentPsychology,2005,25(32):207-218.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494405000216Thisstudyexaminedtherelationsbetweenplace,climate,placeattachmentandplaceidentityusingBreakwell'sfourprocessesmodelofplaceidentity(e.g.Twigger-Ross,Bonaiuto,andBreakwell.(2003).IdentityTheoriesandEnvironmentalPsychology,203–233)asaframework.Followingthis,aninfluenceofhighvs.lowattachmentandurbanvs.country(open-air)-personattitudeonplace(theCityofGothenburg,“Vallgraven”,Sweden)relatedidentityprocesseswasexamined.InlinewithTwigger-RossandUzzell(1996)(PlaceandIdentityProcesses,205–220)itwashypothesizedthathighattachment,togetherwithacongruentplaceidentification,inthiscaseurban-personattitude,wouldinfluencesignificantlymoreresidents’place-relatedidentityprocessesthanlowattachmentandaplaceidentificationwhichwasnotcongruentwithwheretheywereliving,i.e.country(open-air)-personattitude.Inadditionitwashypothesized,inlinewithKnez(2003a)(The5thinternationalconferenceonurbanclimate(ICUC-5),September2003,Lodz,Poland,Vol.2,(2003a)pp.69–72)thatclimatemaybeoneofthemeaningstheyattributetotheplace.Empiricalevidenceonlinksbetweenplaceattachmentandplaceidentityonurbanvs.country(open-air)-personattitudeandplaceidentitywereshownaswellasasignificantroleofclimateinsubjects’conceptionsofaplace,especiallyforthoseconsideredtobehighlyattachedtotheirresidentialarea.Thislatterresultpresentsachallengetoplacetheory,ingeneral,nottakingintoaccountaplace'sclimate(Knez(2003b).The5thinternationalconferenceonurbanclimate(ICUC-5),September2003,Lodz,Poland2(2003b)65–68)).Finally,structuralequationmodellingsuggestedamodeloffiveplaceidentityprocessasopposedtoBreakwell'sfourprocessesmodel,andshowedasignificantlinkproceedingfromresidentialtimetoplaceattachmenttoplaceidentity.Thislatterresultindicatesthatprolongingone'sstayataplaceintensifiesone'semotionalbondtothatplacewhichinturnleadsthataplacebecomesmoreapartofone'sconceptualandextendedselves(Neisser(1998).PhilosophicalPsychology,1,35–59),inthiscontextapartofthecontentofthefiveplace-relatedidentityprocessesofdistinctiveness,referentcontinuity,congruentcontinuity,self-esteemandself-efficacy.DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.03.003
[36]  VignolesVL,ChryssochoouX,BreakwellGM.Evaluatingmodelsofidentitymotivation:Self-esteemisnotthewholestory.SelfandIdentity,2002,1:201-218.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/152988602760124847Wetestedtheimportanceofmotivationalprinciplesofmaintainingself-esteem,distinctiveness,continuityandefficacy(Breakwell,1993),aswellasfeelingsofpurposeandclosenesstoothers,inshapingtheperceivedcentralityofmultipleelementsofidentityamongAnglicanparishpriests.Participants(N=149)generatedidentityelementsandratedthemforperceivedcentralityandsatisfactionofeachprinciple.Comparingmultilevelregressionmodels,satisfactionoftheself-esteemprinciplepredictedanestimated32.5%,thefourpredictorsofBreakwell'smodel49.7%,andallsixpredictors54.6%ofthevariancewithinparticipantsinperceivedcentralityoftheidentityelements(allp<.001).Wearguethatdistinctiveness,continuity,andefficacyshouldbegivenequaltheoreticalconsiderationtoself-esteemasmotivesguidingidentityprocesses(cf.Abrams&Hogg,1988;Brewer,1991;Deaux,1993;Sedikides&Strube,1997).DOI:10.1080/152988602760124847
[37]  VignolesVL,RegaliaC,ManziC,GolledgeJ,etal.Beyondself-esteem:Influenceofmultiplemotivesonidentityconstruction.JournalofPersonalityandSocialPsychology2006,90:308-333.http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM16536653Diversetheoriessuggestthatpeoplearemotivatedtomaintainorenhancefeelingsofself-esteem,continuity,distinctiveness,belonging,efficacy,andmeaningintheiridentities.Fourstudiestestedtheinfluenceofthesemotivesonidentityconstruction,byusingamultilevelregressiondesign.Participantsperceivedasmorecentralthoseidentityelementsthatprovidedagreatersenseofself-esteem,continuity,distinctiveness,andmeaning;thiswasfoundforindividual,relational,andgrouplevelsofidentity,amongvariouspopulations,andbyusingaprospectivedesign.Motivesforbelongingandefficacyinfluencedidentitydefinitionindirectlythroughtheirdirectinfluencesonidentityenactmentandthroughtheircontributionstoself-esteem.Participantswerehappiestaboutthoseidentityelementsthatbestsatisfiedmotivesforself-esteemandefficacy.Thesefindingspointtotheneedforanintegratedtheoryofidentitymotivation.Copyright2006APA,allrightsreserved.DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.308PMID:16536653
[38]  LiuBo,ZhuHong,YuanZhenjie.Thesignificanceofthetraditionalfestivalintheconstructionofplaceidentity:AcasestudyoftheWinterJasmineFlowerMarketinGuangzhou.GeographicalResearch,2012,31(12):2198-2208.[刘博,朱竑,袁振杰.传统节庆在地方认同建构中的意义:以广州“迎春花市”为例.地理研究,2012,31(12):2198-2208.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_dlyj201212007.aspx节庆是地理学研究地方认同的一个重要视角。广州"迎春花市"与广府人"年卅晚行花街"的传统民俗密不可分。一年一度的地方民俗节庆"迎春花市"作为广府地区的特质文化形式,在塑造地方认同中具有独特意义。本文基于新文化地理学视角,采用问卷调查、参与式观察、深度访谈等方法来搜集数据,对问卷数据利用SPSS17.0进行频数统计、描述性统计分析、数据质量分析、因子分析和单因子方差分析,对访谈记录、网络资料等定性资料进行文本分析。结果显示:(1)地方认同形成过程包含认知、情感和意向三个心理过程,迎春花市在这三个层面上都对地方认同的建构有积极作用。特别是,政府尊重民意举办花市之举措有利于促进地方认同的建构;(2)广州世居居民、父辈移居广州者、己辈定居者三类群体对迎春花市的认同过程存在一定差异。尽管,节庆能很好地将不同群体整合进更大的社区,但是新来者要成为"本地人",建立起地方认同仍需假以时日。这些发现将有助于理解广州不同文化身份市民的文化融合及地方认同的形成原因。DOI:10.11821/yj2012120007
[39]  HernándezB,HidalgoMC,Salazar-LaplaceME,etal.Placeattachmentandplaceidentityinnativesandnon-natives.JournalofEnvironmentalPsychology,2007,27(4):310-319.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494407000515AbstractPlaceattachmentisanaffectivebondthatpeopleestablishwithspecificareaswheretheyprefertoremainandwheretheyfeelcomfortableandsafe.Placeidentity,however,hasbeendefinedasacomponentofpersonalidentity,aprocessbywhich,throughinteractionwithplaces,peopledescribethemselvesintermsofbelongingtoaspecificplace.Mostresearchhasobservedpositivecorrelationsbetweenthesevariablesinpopulationsthathavemaintainedongoinginteractionsoverlongperiodsoftime.Thisworkpresentstwostudiesinwhichwecompareplaceattachmenttoplaceidentityinsamplesdifferentiatedaccordingtobirthplaceandlengthofresidence,andthemagnitudeofthesebondstodifferentplaces.Theresultsofthefirststudyrevealeddifferencesbetweenintensityofattachmentandidentitydependingonplaceoforiginandplaceassessed.Thesecondstudyfoundthatidentityandattachmenttendtocoincideinnatives,whileindividualsfromotherplacesgivehigherscoresforattachmentthanforidentity.Resultsfromthetwostudieshaveenabledustoconsiderthatplaceattachmentdevelopsbeforeplaceidentity,atleastinthecaseofthenon-natives.Bothstudiesrevealthatbondsarestrongerwiththecitythanwiththeneighbourhood,butthatattachmentandidentitywiththeislandarestrongerthaneitherofthem.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.003
[40]  ShamsuddinS,UjangN.Makingplaces:TheroleofattachmentincreatingthesenseofplacefortraditionalstreetsinMalaysia.HabitatInternational,2008,32(3):399-409.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397508000027AbstractSenseofplacedefinitionincludesthepointwherethephysicalelement,activityandmeaningareintertwinedinthepeopleexperienceofplace.Inurbandesignandplacequalityresearch,muchhasbeendiscussedonthesignificanceofthephysicalelementsandactivitiesincreatingthesenseofplace;however,theroleofplaceattachmentasacomponentthatgivesplacesmeaning(s)hasnotbeenadequatelyexplored.ThisarticleisbasedonthemainfindingsofadoctoralresearchexaminingattachmenttotraditionalshoppingstreetsinthecitycentreofKualaLumpur.Surveysandface-to-faceinterviewswereconductedwithusersofthestreetstoinvestigateplaceattachmentanditsinfluenceonplaceidentity.Thefindingdemonstratesthatattachmenttothetraditionalstreetsisstronganditinfluencestheusers’perceptionontheidentityoftheplaces.Thestreetswereregardedasveryimportantinsustainingtheeconomicactivitiesandmeaningfulinaccentuatingculturaldiversityandselfandgroupidentity.Thehistoricalsignificanceoftheareaastheearliestshoppinglocationsinthecityevokedpersonalandsharedmeaningstothelong-termuserswhodevelopedstrongerplaceattachment.Thepaperconcludesbyestablishingthatplaceattachmenthasasignificantcontributiontothesenseofplacethereforeshouldbeconsideredinthedesignofurbanplacesespeciallywhenredevelopmentisoneoftheoptions.

DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.01.004
[41]  ZhangNaihe.Trade,CultureandRegionalizationoftheWorld:InteractionandComparisonofChinaandtheWorldintheEarlyModernPeriod.Changchun:JilinPeople'sPublishingHouse,2007.[张乃和.贸易、文化与世界区域化:近代早期中国与世界的互动与比较.长春:吉林人民出版社,2007.]
[42]  SteeleF.TheSenseofPlace.Boston:CBIPublishing,1981.http://xueshu.baidu.com/link?url=0Mxm_-8pQIVoES1pXVfFq3ic1jXsbbuEnbcP4Mwjj6xmwOhk709TZNC8PMe2-KEAD6u9YsOKonSm9A7tDQHR-spttmYteXiuRGvLf7Ymr24x8dPxmaoOLJuPwO4CUtTxLi9dsHuwQr67aaSaFilH4IPESEIE0d72kgJRl9pqx9-vl6KmOJiEhLqmWazLxQzwRLBAkRc62dVD0Pms-MfA_1AHGVNFENrlr4hHCGasISvRDnXj4B6vPSpP1jPi9hzV&wd=SteeleF.The%20Sense%20of%20Place.Boston%3ACBI%20Publishing%2C1981.
[43]  StraussA,CorbinJ.GroundedTheoryMethodology:AnOverview.ThousandOaks:SagePublications,1994.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/232546195_Grounded_theory_methodology_An_overview?citationList=incominggiveanoverviewoftheorigins,purposes,uses,andcontributionsofgroundedtheorymethodology/groundedtheoryisageneralmethodologyfordevelopingtheorythatisgroundedindatasystematicallygatheredandanalyzed(PsycINFODatabaseRecord(c)2012APA,allrightsreserved)
[44]  ChiYongxin.Space,placeandhomeland:Place-characterofspatialityandplacecomposition[D].Tainan:NationalTaiwanNormalUniversity,2000.[池永歆.空间、地方与乡土:大茅埔地方构成及其聚落的空间性[D].台南:国立台湾师范大学,2000.]
[45]  BaiKai,ZhouShangyi,LvYangyang.TheprogressofsocialculturalgeographyinChinainrecent10years.ActaGeographicaSinica,2014,69(8):1190-1206.[白凯,周尚意,吕洋洋.社会文化地理学在中国近10年的进展.地理学报,2014,69(8):1190-1206.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_dlxb201408013.aspx21世纪以来,伴随中国社会的不断“分化”与“变迁”,典型社会文化现象不断涌现,社会文化地理学研究已成为学界所持续关注的研究领域.在初步总结国外社会文化地理学的理论演进脉络的基础上,本研究分析了过去10年以来中国社会文化地理学研究的热点与关注,结合中国发展现状提出,本土社会文化特质的地理学研究、权利与资本对社会文化空间形态与地方建构的影响、城乡与区域人口迁移所形成的流动现象与规模效应等,是未来社会文化地理学应重点关注的研究领域.同时强调了,社会文化地理学在中国的发展,需要注重知识贡献的普适性与中国自身社会文化特质的辩证统一.DOI:10.11821/dlxb201408013
[46]  ZhouShangyi,DaiJuncheng.Logicanalysisofconceptandtheoryofculturalgeography:ProgressinculturalgeographyinChina'smainlandduringthepastdecade.ActaGeographicaSinica,2014,69(10):1521-1532.[周尚意,戴俊骋.文化地理学概念、理论的逻辑关系之分析:以“学科树”分析近年中国大陆文化地理学进展.地理学报,2014,69(10):1521-1532.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_dlxb201410011.aspx梳理近年中国大陆文化地理学进展,需要说明近年代表性的研究课题或著述与文化地理学学科体系之间的关系.1990-2005年中国大陆文化地理学主要从五个文化地理学主题开展研究.然而这五个主题之间的逻辑关系不十分清晰,也没有说清主要概念和理论之间的关系.因此本文首先搭建文化地理学的“学科树”.地理学的主要研究对象是“地方和区域”,文化地理学的目标是从文化的角度分析“地方”的形成机制.本文将这个研究目标作为文化地理学“学科树”的主干,此外建立了“层间关系”和“尺度转换”两个分支,它们是探究地方性的两类方法.本文其次将文化地理学涉及的主要概念和理论分别挂在主干和两个分支上,并努力呈现出主要概念和理论出现的先后顺序,揭示文化地理学的发展进程.本文最后用“学科树”,分析了中国大陆主要文化地理学研究者自己提出的代表性著述.分析的结果是:第一,关于地方形成机制的案例类型多样,多是基于结构主义认识论的分析.第二,关于层间关系的研究已经突破了自然与文化两层关系的分析,延展到文化各层之间的关系.第三,在不同尺度文化区转换的领域研究较薄弱.DOI:10.11821/dlxb201410011
[47]  ZhouShangyi,YangHongyang,KongXiang.Thestructuralisticandhumanisticmechanismofplaceness:Acasestudyof798andM50artdistricts.GeographicalResearch,2011,30(9):1566-1576.[周尚意,杨鸿雁,孔翔.地方性形成机制的结构主义与人文主义分析:以798和M50两个艺术区在城市地方性塑造中的作用为例.地理研究,2011,30(9):1566-1576.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_dlyj201109003.aspx探讨地方性的形成机制对保护传统的地方性和发展新的地方性十分必要。本文选择北京和上海两个艺术类文化创意产业集聚区,分析人文主义机制和结构主义机制的相互作用。按照结构主义的分析思路,调查了艺术区与外界的社会关系;按照人文主义的分析思路,调查了艺术家、画廊经营人和消费者对地方性的认同程度。研究发现:(1)结构主义和人文主义机制共同促成艺术区以景观体现城市的地方性。(2)国外艺术品需求的结构机制虽促成了对中国题材作品的需求,但尚未形成对两个城市地方性题材作品的强大需求。(3)在外界结构动力不足的情况下,三类人群对城市地方性的深层情感认同比较少,因此他们在创作或营销艺术品时,缺少人文主义的内在机制。由此建议:两市的政府应组织一些活动,鼓励艺术家创作本城市题材的艺术作品,从而使该类题材作品逐渐具有市场竞争力,并能抵制经济全球化过程对地方文化的负面冲击。
[48]  PredA,WattsM.ReworkingModernity.NewBrunswick:RutgersUniversityPress,1992.
[49]  TuanYF.Topophilia:AStudyofEnvironmentalPerception,AttitudesandValues.NewJersey:Prentice-HallInc,1974.http://xueshu.baidu.com/link?url=06lA7qVdEB14xqlQpWt_YIOdq4KRTjd3lYrIjTwtr8brMERpz68tWAc2Jgz8tGGHia67hD8AC1J1U4CFD07BrbuNTsQe8X6PJY-ASAcrXy4g1G6xXswr723TR8_pro8xYzS95hIVtX626tovLoVnGv1VDGS8HKnwqZ9NNdWvWs0xGH_nAGvPySczSLYO_dziedyngdH_YfGekExW4P_Wk9Q5ffNIWvboX8Tcg6jLzu7uP3IdxREFzMnqn3yIf75USFs8lK3TVgj-hd317zRA3mpO4xpVnOfy6rtnokp3lXS&wd=Topophilia%3A%20A%20Study%20of%20Environmental%20Perception%2C%20Attitudes%20and%20Values.%20New%20Jersey%3A
[50]  TuanYF.Place:Anexperientialperspective.TheGeographicalReview,1975,65(2):151-165.http://www.jstor.org/stable/213970INTERESTinplaceandinthemeaningofplaceisuniversal.Theacademicdisciplinethatstudiesplaceisgeography.Geographershaveapproachedthestudyofplacefromtwomainperspectives:placeaslocation,aunitwithinahierarchyofunitsinspace;andplaceasaDOI:10.2307/213970
[51]  WangMu,WuBihu.Residents'perceptionsontourismdevelopmentofBarkhorhistoricdistrictinLhasa.HumanGeography,2012,27(2):128-133.[旺姆,吴必虎.拉萨八廓历史文化街区旅游发展居民感知研究.人文地理,2012,27(2):128-133.]http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_rwdl201202023.aspx历史街区是特定地域历史、社会、文化的核心载体,兼具遗产保护、旅游开发价值,在历史街区旅游发展过程中,如何平衡保护与开发是历史地段发展一直面临的挑战。拉萨市八廓街为"中国历史文化名街",代表着藏族历史文化街区的价值与特色,同时也是西藏集宗教、文化、旅游、商业为一体的重要旅游吸引物。本文以八廓街历史文化街区为例,通过实地观察及问卷调查等方式,探讨旅游开发影响与居民感知之间的关系。研究表明,旅游对于地方经济的积极效益已得到普遍肯定,但是旅游对历史街区的具体作用,尤其是对社会文化负面影响的表现是存在分异的,由此也形成了居民态度的差异。
[52]  GaoTian.Thecharacteristicsofmulticulturebroadcasting[D].Shanghai:FudanUniversity,2008.[高甜.我国跨民族人际交往的传播特征剖析[D].上海:复旦大学,2008.]
[53]  ZhuoShihong.Localperceptionandlocalidentityofnationalhighschoolfreshmen:AcasestudyinTaitungcounty.NationalTaitungTeachersCollege,1998.[卓世宏.国民中学一年级学生的乡土知觉与乡土认同:以台东县为例.国立台东师范学院,1998.]
[54]  XiaLiming.Localdefinitionanalysis.TaitungTeachersInauguralIssue,1998:283-299.[夏黎明.鄉土定義分析.台东师院创刊号,1988:283-299.]
[55]  PaauweJ,BoselieP.HRMandPerformance:Whatnext?HumanResourceManagementJournal,2005,15(4):68-83.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00296.x/abstractThelastdecadeofempiricalresearchontheaddedvalueofHRM,alsoknownasthe‘HRMandperformance’debate,demonstratesevidencethatHRMdoesmatter(Huselid,1995;Guestetal,2003;Wrightetal,2003).Unfortunately,therelationshipsareoftenstatisticallyweakandtheremltsambiguous.Thisarticlereviewsandattemptstoextendthetheoreticalandmethodologicalissuesinthisdebate.Itsaimistobuildanagendaforfutureresearchinthisarea.AbriefoverviewofachievementstodateisfollowedbythetheoreticalandmethodologicalissuesrelatedtowhatconstitutesHRM,whatismeantbytheconceptofperfomzanceandthenatureofthelinkbetweenthesetwo.Inthefinalsection,itisarguedthatresearchdesignsshouldstartfromamulti-dimensionalconceptofperformance,includingtheperceptionsofemployees;andbuildonthepremiseofHRsystemsasanenablingdeviceforawholerangeofstrategicoptions.Thisimpliesareversalofthestrategy-HRMlinkage.DOI:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00296.x
[56]  HuYouhui.QualitativeResearch:Theory,MethodandtheNativeWomen'sStudiesInstance.ChuliuPublisher,1996.[胡幼慧.质性研究:理论,方法及本土女性研究实例.巨流图书有限公司,1996.]
[57]  YuYiming.ResearchofthecorevalueofChina'smilitary:Theoreticalandempiricalanalysis.Taipei:FuHsingKangCollege,2005.[余一鸣.我国军人核心价值之研究:理论建构与实证分析.台北:政治作战学校,2005.]
[58]  WuMingling.QuestionnaireStatisticalAnalysisPractice:SPSSOperationandApplication.Chongqing:ChongqingUniversityPress,2010.[吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.]
[59]  BrymanA,CramerD.QuantitativeDataAnalysiswithSPSSforWindows.London:Rourlege,1999.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/243772542_Quantitative_data_analysis_with_SPSS_for_WindowsPage1.QuantitativedataanalysiswithSPSSforWindowsAguideforsocialscientistsAlanBrymanandDuncanCramerLondonandNewYork'fl'_~VI_~'DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1996.tb01096.x
[60]  KennethAB,ScottL.Testsforstructuralequationmodels:Introduction.SociologicalMethodsandResearch,1992,21(2):123-131.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/240277927_Tests_for_Structural_Equation_Models_IntroductionSincethepioneeringworkofRuscheandKirchheimer(1939),thetheoreticallinksbetweenlaborsurplusandpunishmenthaveseenextensivedevelopmentElevenofthoselinksdescribedherearemediatedbyeconomic,political,andideologicalfactorssuchasthevalueoflabor,thesystemicneedsofcapitalism,andtheideologyofjudgesandtheircommunities.Thesophisticationoftheorizingaboutlaborsurplusandpunishmentismatchedwithskepticismaboutthecorrespondingempiricalevidencewhichhasbeentermed"elusive"and"contradictory"atbest.Theresultsfrom44empiricalstudiesaresystematicallyassessed.Theevidencesuggeststhatindependentoftheeffectsofcrime,laborsurplusisconsistentlyandsignificantlyrelatedtoprisonpopulationandtoprisonadmissionswhentime-seriesandindividualleveldataareusedTherelationshipoflaborsurplusandpunishmentappearsslightlystrongerwhenage,race,andgenderspecificmeasuresareemployed.Thelimitationsofexistingresearch,inlightoftheoreticaldevelopments,arediscussed.DOI:10.1177/0049124192021002001
[61]  BagozziRP,YiY.OntheEvaluationofstructureequationmodels.JournaloftheAcademyofMarketingSience,1988,16(1):74-94.
[62]  FornellC,LarckerDF.Evaluatingstructuralequationmodelswithunobservablevariablesandmeasurementerror.JournalofMarketingResearch,1981,18(1):39-50.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3151312Thestatisticaltestsusedintheanalysisofstructuralequationmodelswithunobservablevariablesandmeasurementerrorareexamined.Adrawbackofthecommonlyappliedchisquaretest,inadditiontotheknownproblemsrelatedtosamplesizeandpower,isthatitmayindicateanincreasingcorrespondencebetweenthehypothesizedmodelandtheobserveddataasboththemeasurementpropertiesandtherelationshipbetweenconstructsdecline.Further,andcontrarytocommonassertion,theriskofmakingaTypeIIerrorcanbesubstantialevenwhenthesamplesizeislarge.Moreover,thepresenttestingmethodsareunabletoassessamodel'sexplanatorypower.Toovercometheseproblems,theauthorsdevelopandapplyatestingsystembasedonmeasuresofsharedvariancewithinthestructuralmodel,measurementmodel,andoverallmodel.DOI:10.2307/3151312
[63]  DaiQingzhong,TaoYusu.Comparisonofinteraction:Studyonmechanismofsmallethnicculturedevelopmentinthecontextofglobalization.Thinking,2011,37(1):22-27.[戴庆中,陶渝苏.比较互动:全球化语境下地方小族群文化发展机制研究.思想战线,2011,37(1):22-27.]
[64]  KeMeixia.CreativeculturegovernanceinTaipei:ThecaseofSongshanCulturalandCreativePark[D].Taipei:NationalTaiwanNormalUniversity,2014.[柯美霞.台北市创意文化治理:以松山文创园区的空间生产为例[D].台北:国立台湾师范大学,2014.]

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133