全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

中国特别重大自然灾害损失统计的最新进展——《特别重大自然灾害损失统计制度》解析*

DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.05.0530, PP. 530-538

Keywords: 特别重大自然灾害,损失统计,指标体系,科学性,实用性

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

以《特别重大自然灾害损失统计制度》(简称《统计制度》)主要执笔人的视角,详细阐述了制度的主要内容、蕴含的科学问题和未来研究方向。《统计制度》报表和指标设计在与现有国家标准保持一致、历经汶川地震等多次重特大灾害实践检验完善、充分吸收相关行业部门意见和建议、适用于多灾种与灾害链损失统计、实用于灾后恢复重建规划编制等方面均体现出其权威性与最新性,《统计制度》具备科学性、综合性、实用性和动态性等特征。《统计制度》在推进特别重大自然灾害损失综合评估、启发涉灾行业部门开展专项深入研究、引领地方建立相关制度等方面具有极大潜力。

References

[1]  Zou Ming, Yuan Yi, Liao Yongfeng, et al. Integrated Risk Governance: Integrated Natural Disaster Relief System in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011:2-10.[邹铭,袁艺,廖永丰,等. 综合风险防范:中国综合自然灾害救助保障体系[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2011:2-10.]
[2]  Zhang Weixing, Shi Peijun, Zhou Hongjian. Study on definition and division criteria of a large-scale disaster: Analysis of typical disasters in the world in recent years[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2013, 28(1): 15-22.[张卫星,史培军,周洪建. 巨灾定义与划分标准研究:基于近年来全球典型灾害案例的分析[J]. 灾害学,2013,28(1):15-22.]
[3]  Zhang Weixing, Zhou Hongjian. Conceptual model of disaster chain risk assessment: Taking Wenchuan Earthquake on 12 May 2008 as a case[J]. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(1): 130-138.[张卫星,周洪建. 灾害链风险评估的概念模型:以汶川5·12特大地震为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2013,32(1):130-138.]
[4]  EMA (Emergency Management Australia). Australia Emergency Manuals Series, Part III: Emergency Management Practice, Disaster Loss Assessment Guidelines[C]. Canberra: Lllycfoft Pty Ltd, Brisbane and PenUltimate, 2002.
[5]  ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). Handbook for Estimating the Socio-economic and Environmental Effects of Disasters[R].Mexico, 2003.
[6]  Consultative Group on Indonesia (CCI). Preliminary Damage and Loss Assessment: Yogyakarta and Central Java Natural Disaster[EB/OL]. The 15th Meeting of the Consultative Group on Indonesia, Jakarta. (2006-06-14)[2014-09-10].http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTINDONESIA/Resources/226271-11501965 84718/PackageJune13_HIRES_FINAL.pdf.
[7]  WMO & GWP. Flood Loss Assessment Tool[EB/OL]. (2007-10-20)[2014-09-10].http://www.gwptoolbox.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=26&Itemid=25.
[8]  FEMA. HAZUS, FEMA’s Software for Estimating Potential Losses from Disasters[EB/OL].Federal Emergency Management Agency.(2008-07-15)[2014-08-20].http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/.
[9]  APEC (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation). Guidelines and Best Practices for Post-disaster Damage and Loss Assessment[R].Yogyakarta, 2009.
[10]  PAGER (Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response)[EB/OL].(2010-04-20)[2014-08-21].http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/pager.
[11]  WAPMERR (World Agency of Planetary Monitoring Earthquake Risk Reduction)[EB/OL].[2010-11-11].http://www.wapmerr.org.
[12]  SUPREME (former name SIGNAL)[EB/OL].[2010-11-11].http://www.tokyo-gas.co.jp/signal.
[13]  NERIES (Network of Research Infrastructures for European Seismology)[EB/OL].[2010-10-21].http://www.neries-eu.org.
[14]  Yuan Yi. Advances in the assessment of natural disaster situation[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2010,25(1): 22-32.[袁艺. 自然灾害灾情评估研究与实践进展[J]. 地球科学进展,2010,25(1):22-32.]
[15]  Yuan Yi, Zhang Lei. Present statistics situation on natural disaster and its future in China[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2006, 21(4): 89-93.[袁艺,张磊. 中国自然灾害灾情统计现状及展望[J]. 灾害学,2006,21(4):89-93.]
[16]  Wu Guoxiong, Lin Hai, Zou Xiaolei, et al. Research on global climate change and scientific data[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2014, 29(1): 15-22.[吴国雄,林海,邹晓蕾,等. 全球气候变化研究与科学数据[J]. 地球科学进展,2014,29(1):15-22.]
[17]  Shi Peijun, Kong Feng, Ye Qian, et al. Disaster risk science development and disaster risk reduction using science and technology[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2014, 29(11): 1 205-1 211.[史培军,孔峰,叶谦,等. 灾害风险科学发展与科技减灾[J]. 地球科学进展,2014,29(11):1 205-1 211.]
[18]  Ministry of Civil Affairs, the National Bureau of Statistics. Statistical System of the Large- scale Natural Disaster Loss[EB/OL].(2014-05-09)[2014-10-21].http://xxgk.mca.gov.cn/n1360/n51127.files/n51128.pdf.[民政部、国家统计局. 特别重大自然灾害损失统计制度[EB/OL].(2014-05-09)[2014-10-21].http://xxgk.mca.gov.cn/n1360/n51127.files/n51128.pdf.]
[19]  Shi Peijun, Yuan Yi. Integrated assessment of large-scale natural disasters in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(9): 1 145-1 151.[史培军,袁艺. 重特大自然灾害综合评估体系构建[J]. 地理科学进展,2014,33(9):1 145-1 151.]
[20]  NCDR (National Disaster Reduction Committee), (EGER-MST) Expert Group for Earthquake Relief of The Ministry of Science & Technology. Comprehensive Analysis and Assessment for Wenchuan Earthquake[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008.[国家减灾委,科技部抗震救灾专家组.汶川地震灾害综合分析与评估[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.]
[21]  The Sate Council. The State Overall Planning for Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction[EB/OL].(2008-08-12)[2014-11-01].http://www.gov.cn/wcdzzhhfcjghzqyjg.pdf.[国务院. 国家汶川地震灾后恢复重建总体规划[EB/OL].(2008-08-12)[2014-11-01].http://www.gov.cn/wcdzzhhfcjghzqyjg.pdf.]
[22]  The Sate Council. Overall Planning for Post-Lushan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction[EB/OL].(2013-07-15)[2014-11-01].http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-07/15/content_2445989.htm.[国务院. 芦山地震灾后恢复重建总体规划[EB/OL].(2013-07-15)[2014-11-01].http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-07/15/content_2445989.htm.]
[23]  Yuan Yi. Comprehensive damage and loss assessment system of catastrophic natural disaster[J]. Disaster Reduction in China, 2014, (1): 34-37.[袁艺. 特别重大自然灾害损失综合评估回顾与展望[J]. 中国减灾,2014,(1):34-37.]
[24]  Li Quanmao, Zhou Hongjian. Three acquisition from the travel to Thailand[J]. Disaster Reduction in China, 2012, (15): 58-59.[李全茂,周洪建. 访泰三得[J]. 中国减灾,2012,(15):58-59.]

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133