全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
财贸经济  2015 

集体领导者与个人领导者——一项公共品博弈实验研究

, PP. 20-34

Keywords: 个人领导者,集体领导者,领导者榜样,公共品博弈

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

个人领导者与集体领导者孰优孰劣?对这个问题的讨论将极具现实意义,并且有着重要的理论意义。本文在一个领导者榜样的标准线性公共品博弈框架内对这个问题进行了探讨。通过对比个人领导者和集体领导者的捐赠和估计行为,以及个人领导者下和集体领导者下追随者的捐赠行为,我们发现个人领导者比集体领导者更有利于公共品的供给。我们的发现对现实中的组织设计和管理问题有一定的启示。

References

[1]  1.黄国宾、周业安:《领导者博弈的实验经济学研究述评》,《经济理论与经济管理》2014年第10期。
[2]  2.姜树广、韦倩:《信念与心理博弈:理论、实证与应用》,《经济研究》2013年第6期。
[3]  3.雷震:《集体与个体腐败行为实验研究——一个不完全信息最后通牒博弈模型》,《经济研究》2013年第4期。
[4]  4.聂左玲、汪崇金:《公共品实验中策略性方法的有效性检验——来自中国的经济学实验证据》,《财经研究》2013年第12期。
[5]  5.汪崇金、聂左玲、岳军:《个体异质性、预期与公共品自愿供给——来自中国的经济学实验证据》,《财贸经济》2012年第8期。
[6]  6.周业安、连洪泉、陈叶烽、左聪颖、叶航:《社会角色、个体异质性和公共品自愿供给》,《经济研究》2013年第1期。
[7]  7.周业安、黄国宾、何浩然、刘曼微:《领导者真的能起到榜样作用吗?——一项基于公共品博弈实验的研究》,《管理世界》,2014年第10期。
[8]  8.Alchian,A.A.,and Demsetz,H.,Production,Information Costs,and Economic Organization.The American Economic Review,Vol.62,No.5,1972,pp.777-795.
[9]  9.Andreoni,J.,Toward a Theory of Charitable Fund-Raising.Journal of Political Economy,Vol.106,No.6,1998,pp.1186-1213.
[10]  10.Balafoutas,L.,Kerschbamer,R.,Kocher,M.,and Sutter,M.,Revealed Distributional Preferences: Individuals vs.Teams.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,Vol.108,December 2014,pp.319-330..
[11]  11.Cardella,E.,and Chiu,R.,Stackelberg in the Lab: The Effect of Group Decision Making and“Cooling-off”Periods.Journal of Economic Psychology.Vol.33,No.6,2012,pp.1070-1083.
[12]  12.Cartwright,E.J.,and Lovett,D.,Leadership and Conditional Cooperation in Public Good Games:What Difference does the Game Make?Department of Economics,University of Kent Working Paper,No.1324,2013.
[13]  13.Charness,G.,and Sutter,M.,Groups Make Better Self-Interested Decisions.The Journal of Economic Perspectives,Vol.26,No.3,2012,pp.157-176.
[14]  14.Fehr,E.,and Gchter,S.,Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments.The American Economic Review,Vol.90,No.4,2000,pp.980-994.
[15]  15.Fischbacher,U.,Gchter,S.,and Fehr,E.,Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from A Public Goods Experiment.Economics Letters,Vol.71,No.3,2001,pp.397-404.
[16]  16.Fischbacher,U.,Z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-Made Economic Experiments.Experimental Economics,Vol.10,No.2,2007,pp.171-178.
[17]  17.Fischbacher,U.,and Gchter,S.,Social Preferences,Beliefs,and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods Experiments.The American Economic Review,Vol.100,No.1,2010,pp.541-556.
[18]  18.Fischbacher,U.,Gchter,S.,and Quercia,S.,The Behavioral Validity of the Strategy Method in Public Good Experiments.Journal of Economic Psychology,Vol.33,No.4,2012,pp.897-913.
[19]  19.Gchter,S.,Nosenzo,D.,Renner,E.,and Sefton,M.,Who Makes a Good Leader? Cooperativeness,Optimism,and Leading-By-Example.Economic Inquiry,Vol.50,No.4,2012,pp.953-967.
[20]  20.He,H.,and Villeval,M.C.,Are teams less inequality averse than individuals?IZA Discussion Paper No.8217,May 2014.
[21]  21.Hermalin,B.E.,Toward an Economic Theory of Leadership: Leading by Example.American Economic Review,Vol.88,No.5,1998,pp.1188-1206.
[22]  22.Hildenbrand,A.,Is a firm a firm? A Stackelberg Experiment.Economics: The Open-Access,Open-Assessment E-Journal,Vol.7,No.2003-20,2013,pp.1-26.
[23]  23.Holmstrom,B.,Moral Hazard in Teams.The Bell Journal of Economics,Vol.13,No.2,1982,pp.324-340.
[24]  24.Isaac,R.M.,Walker,J.,Thomas,S.H.,Divergent Evidence on Free Riding: An Experimental Examination of Possible Explanations.Public Choice,Vol.43,No.2,1984,pp.113-149.
[25]  25.Kugler,T.,Kausel,E.E.,and Kocher,M.G.,Are Groups more Rational than Individuals? A Review of Interactive Decision Making in Groups.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science,Vol.3,No.4,2012,pp.471-482.
[26]  26.Meidinger,C.,and Villeval,M.C.,Leadership in Teams: Signaling or Reciprocating? Working Paper du GATE,No.2002-13,2002.
[27]  27.Müller,W.,and Tan,F.,Who Acts more Like A Game Theorist? Group and Individual Play in A Sequential Market Game and the Effect of the Time Horizon.Games and Economic Behavior,Vol.82, 2013,pp.658-674.
[28]  28.Selten,R.,Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des Eingeschrankt Rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperimentes.In: Sauermann,H.(Ed.),Beitrage zur Experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung.J.C.B.Mohr(PaulSiebeck),Tubingen,1967,pp.136-168.
[29]  29.Tversky A,Kahneman D.,The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.Science,Vol.211,No.4481,1981,pp.453-458.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133