全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
植物学报  2015 

芸芥自交亲和性变异的初步研究

DOI: 10.11983/CBB14113, PP. 598-604

Keywords: 芸芥,套袋自交,自交亲和指数,自交亲和性变异

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

?为了判断芸芥(Erucasativa)自交亲和性的变异情况,采用套袋自交、剥蕾自交和开放授粉3种方法,对来源于中国、伊朗和巴基斯坦的52份芸芥的自交亲和指数及相对亲和指数进行了统计分析。结果表明:(1)芸芥为高度自交不亲和植物,其不同品种(系)中存在自交亲和基因;(2)芸芥不同品种间自交亲和性存在广泛的变异,品种间自交亲和指数介于0–4.98之间,品种内不同个体间自交亲和性也存在广泛的变异;(3)参试材料分为4种类型,即高自交亲和、自交亲和、自交不亲和(0<自交亲和指数<1.00)及高自交不亲和;(4)芸芥自交亲和性因生态类型而异,西南地区的材料自交亲和性最高,西北地区次之,华北地区最低。总之,芸芥为一种高度自交不亲和植物,其自交亲和性状存在广泛的变异,共有4种变异类型。

References

[1]  Michalis O, Chara P, Dimitra K(2012). Relationships between nitrogen, dry matter accumulation and glucosinolates in Eruca sativa Mill. Plant and Soil 1, 347-358.
[2]  张 涛,孙万仓(2004). 芸芥与油菜远缘杂交亲和性研究. 西北农业学报13, 28-30.
[3]  孙万仓,官春云,孟亚雄,刘志刚, 张 涛, 李 栒,杨随庄,令利军,陈社员,曾秀存,王鹤龄(2005). 芸芥与芸薹属3 个油用种的远缘杂交. 作物学报31, 36-42.
[4]  Matsuzawa Y, Mekiyanon S, Kaneko Y, Bang S W, Wakui K,Takahata Y(1999). Male sterility in alloplasmic Brassica rapa L. Carrying Eruca sativa cytoplasm. Plant Breeding 118,82-84.
[5]  范惠玲,孙万仓,武军艳,朱惠霞,燕 妮(2007). 白芥自交亲和性分析, 西北植物学报27, 0859 -0863.
[6]  孙万仓,范惠玲,孟亚雄, 张涛, 张金文, 王宝成, 武军燕, 邵登魁(2006). 利用 RAPD 分子标记技术研究芸芥的遗传多样性. 中国农业科学 39, 1049-1057.
[7]  陶国华,徐家炳,李银安(1982). 关于大白菜自交不亲和性稳定性问题的探讨. 中国农业科学15, 30-37
[8]  方智远, 孙培田, 刘玉梅(1983).甘蓝杂种优势利和自交不亲和选育的几个问题.中国农业科学16, 51-62
[9]  刘后利(2000).油菜遗传育种学. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社,.pp. 82-177.
[10]  Szabo(2003). Plum(Prunus domestica L.) In:Floral biology,pollination and fertilisation in temperature zone fruit species and grape. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest. pp.383-410.
[11]  孙万仓,范惠玲,叶剑, 张亚宏,刘雅利,曾军,王鹏(2006).白菜型油菜自交亲和性变异分析.西北植物学报26,688 -695.
[12]  孟金陵(1995). 植物生殖遗传学.上海:科学出版社. pp. 50-51.
[13]  Seavey S R., Bawa K S(1986). Late-acting self-compatibility in angiosperms. Bot.Rev 52, 195-219.
[14]  Kodad O, Socias i Company R(2008). Fruit set evaluation for self-compatibility selection in almond. Scientia Horticulturae 118, 260 -265.
[15]  Dragan N AND Dragan M(2010). Examining self-compatibility in plum by fluorescence microscopy. Genetic42, 287-396.
[16]  Sun WC, Pan QY, Liu Z G, Meng YX, Zhang T, Wang HL(2005). Overcoming self-incompatibility in Eruca sativa by chemical treatment of stigmas. Plant Genetic Resources 1, 13 -18.
[17]  Jeremiah WB and Lillis U(2011). Insights Gained From 50 Years of Studying the Evolution of Self-Compatibility in Leavenworthia (Brassicaceae). Evolutionary Biology 1,15-27.
[18]  Daniel JB, Lisa J R, John S, Frank AD(2010). Yield variation among Clones of Lowbush Blueberry as a Function of Genetic Similarity and Self-compatibility. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science3,259-270.
[19]  Noemi TZ, Mordehai D, Eran R, Yossi M (2012). Selection of interspecific vine cacti hybrids (Hylocereus spp.) for self-compatibility. Plant Breeding 5, 681-685.
[20]  Chen K, Zhang XB, Jiang JL (2011) . Plantlet regeneration from cotyledon, cotyledon petiole, and hypocotyl explants via somatic embryogenesis pathway in roquette(Eruca sativa M.). Plant Biosystems 1-2, 68-76.
[21]  孙万仓(2000). 中国芸芥的分布、类型划分及油菜、芸芥杂交亲和性研究.博士论文. 湖南农业大学. pp. 26-30.

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133