全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Internal Migration and Fertility in Turkey: Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis

DOI: 10.1155/2012/329050

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Starting from the mid-twentieth century, Turkey has experienced a remarkable fertility decline. Total period fertility declined from the level of 6 or 7 to the almost replacement level by 2003. Similarly, in the 1950s onwards internal migration gathered speed and transformed Turkey from a predominantly rural country to a mainly urban one in less than half a century. Fertility and migration were mutually reinforcing processes in Turkey. Considering this relationship, the study aims to compare fertility behaviours of migrants with those of nonmigrants at both origin and destination areas. The data source is the 2003 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey. A nonparametric descriptive survival analysis technique, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, was employed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of transition to first, second and subsequent births were compared by migration status. Survival curves of second and subsequent births for rural-to-urban and urban-to-rural migrant women are similar to the curves at the place of destination rather than place of origin. This result reveals that adaptation theory, rather than socialization theory, is more explanatory in the case of Turkey. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates showed that rural native and rural-to-rural migrant women experience all the events related with family formation earlier in their life cycle. 1. Introduction Turkey underwent substantial social and economic changes in the last century, especially from 1950 onwards. Starting in the 1950s, internal migration and urbanization gathered speed and became one of the most important factors changing social and economic structure of Turkey. The results of 2003 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey [1] reveal that urban population exceeded 71 percent of the total population, transforming Turkey from a predominantly rural country to a mainly urban one in less than half a century. Similarly, Turkey experienced a serious fertility decline starting in the 1950s. Until the 1970s, the decline was gradual, but since that time the country experienced a steeper decline. During this process of change, the level of total period fertility declined from a level of 6 or 7 to a value near to replacement level by the 2000s. Moreover, the 2003 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey [1] shows that in three of the five demographic regions, namely in the West, the Central, and the North Anatolia regions, the total fertility rate is below the replacement level. Changes in fertility and migration occurred simultaneously as mutually reinforcing processes in Turkey. There are relatively few

References

[1]  Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (HUIPS), 2003 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey, 2004.
[2]  D. Goldberg, “The fertility of two generation urbanites,” Population Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 214–222, 1959.
[3]  D. Goldberg, “Another look at the Indianapolis fertility data,” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, vol. 38, pp. 23–36, 1960.
[4]  O. D. Duncan, “Farm background and differential fertility,” Demography, vol. 2, pp. 240–249, 1965.
[5]  R. Freedman and D. P. Slesinger, “Fertility differentials for the indigenous non-farm population of the United States,” Population Studies, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 161–173, 1961.
[6]  N. J. McGirr and C. Hirschman, “The two generation urbanite hypothesis revisited,” Demography, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 1979.
[7]  I. Rosenwaike, “Two generations of Italian in America: their fertility experience,” International Migration Review, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 271–280, 1973.
[8]  E. H. Stephen and F. D. Bean, “Assimilation, disruption and the fertility of Mexican-origin women in the United States,” International Migration Review, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 67–88, 1992.
[9]  J. R. Kahn, “Immigrant selectivity and fertility adaptation in the United States,” Social Forces, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 108–128, 1988.
[10]  G. C. Myers and E. W. Morris, “Migration and fertility in Puerto Rico,” Population Studies, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 85–96, 1966.
[11]  S. Goldstein, “Interrelations between migration and fertility in Thailand,” Demography, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 225–241, 1973.
[12]  V. A. Hiday, “Migration, urbanization, and fertility in the Philippines,” International Migration Review, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 370–385, 1978.
[13]  S. C. Farber and B. S. Lee, “Fertility adaptation of rural-to-urban migrant women: a method of estimation applied to Korean women,” Demography, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 339–345, 1984.
[14]  B. S. Lee and L. G. Pol, “The influence of rural-urban migration on migrants' fertility in Korea, Mexico and Cameroon,” Population Research and Policy Review, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3–26, 1993.
[15]  H. Kulu, “Migration and fertility: competing hypotheses re-examined,” European Journal of Population, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 51–87, 2005.
[16]  State Institute of Statistics (SIS), The Population of Turkey, 1923–1994 Demographic Structure and Development, State Institute of Statistics Prime Ministry Republic of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey, 1995.
[17]  State Institute of Statistics (SIS), 2000 Census of Population Social and Economic Characteristics of Population, State Institute of Statistics, Ankara, Turkey, 2000.
[18]  ?. Ko?, M. A. Eryurt, T. Adal?, and P. ?a?atay, Türkiye’nin Demografik D?nü?ümü: Do?urganl?k, Aile Planlamas?, Anne-?ocuk Sa?l??? ve Be? Ya? Alt? ?lümlerdeki De?i?imler: 1968–2008, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey, 2010.
[19]  Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT) (Download date: 29.03.2012) Population Projections and Estimations—Demographic Indicators, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/VeriBilgi.do?tb_id=39&ust_id=11.
[20]  N. Levine and S. Uner, Population Policy Formation and Implementation in Turkey, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey, 1978.
[21]  S. üner, Türkiye Nüfusu: Boyutlar Sorunlar Yorumlar, HUIPS, Ankara, Turkey, 1984.
[22]  TüS?AD, Türkiye’nin F?rsat Penceresi Demografik Ge?i? ve ?zdü?ümleri, Türk Sanayicileri ve ??adamlar? Derne?i, ?stanbul, Turkey, 1999.
[23]  E. Franz, Population Policy in Turkey, Deutches Orient-lnstitut, Hamburg, Germany, 1994.
[24]  A. Gedik, “Internal migration in Turkey, 1965–1985: test of some conflicting findings in the literature,” Working Paper, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, 1996.
[25]  T. Kocaman, “Türkiye’de ?? g??ler—?ller aras? k?r-kent g??leri ve g?? edenlerin nitelikleri (1965–1990),” in Türkiye’de Tar?msal Yap? ve ?stihdam, T. Bulutay, Ed., DPT, Ankara, Turkey, 1998.
[26]  A. ??duygu and ?. Sirkeci, “Cumhuriyet d?nemi Türkiye’sinde G?? hareketleri,” in 75 Y?lda K?ylerden ?ehirlere, O. Baydar, Ed., Türk Tarih Vakf?, ?stanbul, Turkey, 1999.
[27]  Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT), Census of Population, Migration Statistics, Ankara, Turkey, 2000.
[28]  Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (HUIPS), Survey on Migration and Internally Displaced Persons in Turkey, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey, 2006.
[29]  F. ?zbay and B. Yücel, “Türkiye’de g?? hareketleri, devlet politikalar? ve demografik yap?,” in Nüfus ve Kalk?nma: G??, E?itim, Demokrasi, Ya?am Kalitesi, F. ?zbay, B. Yücel, and ?. Sezai, Eds., Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Ankara, Turkey, 2001.
[30]  G. Rodriguez and J. N. Hobcraft, “Illustrative analysis: life table analysis of birth intervals in Colombia,” The Haugue Netherlands, World Fertility Survey Scientific Reports 369, 1980.
[31]  G. Feeney and Jingyuan Yu, “Period parity progression measures of fertility in China,” Population Studies, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 77–102, 1987.
[32]  United Nations, Family-Building and Family Planning Evaluation, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. United Nations, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
[33]  H. P. Blossfeld, K. Golsch, and G. Rohwer, Techniques of Event History Modeling Using Stata. New Approaches to Causal Analysis, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2007.
[34]  E. L. Kaplan and P. Meier, “Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 53, pp. 457–481, 1958.
[35]  N. Mantel, “Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration,” Cancer Chemotherapy Reports. Part 1, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 163–170, 1966.
[36]  D. Schoenfeld, “The asymptotic properties of nonparametric tests for comparing survival distributions,” Biometrika, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 316–319, 1981.
[37]  D. Harrington, Linear Rank Tests in Survival Analysis Standard Article, Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, Wiley Interscience, 2005.
[38]  Y. Hong, “Marital decision-making and the timing of first birth in rural China before the 1990s,” Population Studies, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 329–341, 2006.
[39]  G. Feeney and Wang Feng, “Parity progression and birth intervals in China: the influence of policy in hastening fertility decline,” Population & Development Review, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 61–101, 1993.
[40]  S. Yavuz, “Completing the fertility transition: third birth developments by language groups in Turkey,” Demographic Research, vol. 15, article 15, pp. 435–460, 2006.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413