全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

温室气体排放权的财产权属性和制度化困境――对哈丁“公地悲剧”理论的反思

, PP. 101-110

Keywords: 公地悲剧,财产权,排放额

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

哈丁的“公地悲剧”理论引导西方学者们从产权的角度论证温室气体减排的途径,并建议相关法律制度对排放实体所持有的排放额予以财产权确认。中国学者亦论证了排放额用益物权的属性。然而,以静态的财产制度处理动态的大气环境问题,予以确认和保护的财产权不免欠缺稳定性和持续性,并使政府不得不面临财产分配和财产征收是否合法和公允的质疑。并且,大气环境问题的综合性、远期性和国际性,亦决定了以国内财产制度应对大气环境容量问题的不足。

References

[1]  Robert W. McGee & Water E. Block. Pollution Trading Permits as a Form of Market Socialism and the Search for a Real Market Solution to Environmental Pollution[J]. Fordham Envtl. L.J. ,1994,(6).
[2]  Bruce Yandle. Escaping Environmental Feudalism[J]. Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y. ,1992,(15).
[3]  Harold Demsetz. The Cost of Transacting[J]. Q.J. Econ. ,1968,(82).
[4]  Daniel H. Cole. From Local to Global Property: Privatizing the Global Environment?Clearing the Air: Four Propositions about Property Rights and Environmental Protection[J]. Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y F. ,1999,(10).
[5]  David M. Driesen and Amy Sinden. The Missing Instrument: Dirty Input Limits[J]. Harv. Envtl. L. Rev.,2009,(33).
[6]  Bruce Yandle. From Local to Global Commons: Private Property, Common Property, and Hybrid Property Regimes: Grasping for The Heavens: 3-D Property Rights and the Global Commons[J]. Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y F. ,1999,(10).
[7]  Daniel H. Cole. Pollution and Property: Comparing Ownership Institutions for Environmental Protection[M]. Cambridge :Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[8]  Gerald Torres. Who Owns the Sky?[J]. Pace Envtl. L. Rev. ,2001,(18).
[9]  Carol M. Rose. The Several Futures of Property: Of Cyberspace and Folk Tales, Emission Trades and Ecosystems[J]. Minn.L.Rev.,1998,(83) .
[10]  Carol M. Rose. Expanding the Choices for the Global Commons: Comparing Newfangled Tradable Allowance Schemes to Old-Fashioned Common Property Regimes[J]. Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y F. ,1999,(10).
[11]  王利民,主编.民法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
[12]  David M. Driesen. What’s Property Got to Do with It? -A Review Essay of Pollution & Property: Comparing Ownership Institutions for Environmental Protection by Daniel Cole[J]. Ecology L.Q.,2003,(30).
[13]  黄宏平.七省市试点方案出炉,探索中国特色碳交易[EB/OL].(2012-10-15)[2013-07-10].http://paper.chinahightech.com.cn/html/2012-10/15/content_32256.htm.
[14]  RGGI at One Year: An Evaluation of the Design and Implementation of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative[EB/OL]. (2010-02-23)[2013-06-20].http://www.env-ne.org/public/resources/pdf/ENE_2009_RGGI_Evaluation_20100223_FINAL.pdf.
[15]  Daniel H. Cole & Peter Z. Grossman. When Is Command-and-Control Efficient? Institutions, Technology, and the Comparative Efficiency of Alternative Regulatory Regimes for Environmental Protection[J].Wis. L. Rev.,1999,(23).
[16]  Alexander Kazazis. The Western Climate Initiative: The Fate of an Experiment In Subnational Cross-Border Environmental Collaboration[J]. Brooklyn J. Int’l L., 2012,(37).
[17]  英国企业不满欧洲议会否决提高碳排放价格的投票[EB/OL]. (2013-04-23)[2013-07-17].http://news.china.com.cn/live/2013-04/23/content_19652763.htm.
[18]  Garrett Hardin. The Tragedy of the Commons[J]. Science,1968,(162).
[19]  Amy Sinden. The Tragedy of the Commons and the Myth of a Private Property Solution[J]. U. Colo. L. Rev.,2007,(78).

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413