全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Improving the Autoregressive Modeling Method in Random Noise Suppression of GPR Data Using Undecimated Discrete Wavelet Transform

DOI: 10.4236/jsip.2018.91002, PP. 24-35

Keywords: Ground Penetrating Radar, Random Noise, Undecimated Discrete Wavelet Transform, Autoregressive Filter

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Geophysics has played a significant and efficient role in studying geological structures over the past decades as the goal of geophysical data acquisition is to investigate underground phenomena with the highest possible level of accuracy. The ground penetrating radar (GPR) method is used as a nondestructive method to reveal shallow structures by beaming electromagnetic waves through the Earth and recording the received reflections, albeit inevitably, along with random noise. Various types of noise affect GPR data, among the most important of which are random noise resulting from arbitrary motions of particles during data acquisition. Random noise which exists always and at all frequencies, along with coherent noise, reduces the quality of GPR data and must be reduced as much as possible. Over the recent years, discrete wavelet transform has proved to be an efficient tool in signal processing, especially in image and signal compressing and noise suppression. It also allows for obtaining an accurate understanding of the signal properties. In this study, we have used the autoregression in both wavelet and f-x domains to suppress random noise in synthetic and real GPR data. Finally, we compare noise suppression in the two domains. Our results reveal that noise suppression is conducted more efficiently in the wavelet domain due to decomposing the signal into separate subbands and exclusively applying the method parameters in autoregression modeling for each subband.

References

[1]  Annan, A.P. (2001) Ground Penetrating Radar. Workshop Notes, No. September, 192.
[2]  Daniels, D.J. (2004) Ground Penetrating Radar.
[3]  Burrus, S.C. and Gopinath, R.A. (2013) Wavelets and Wavelet Transforms. Rice Univ. Houston, Texas, 1-281.
[4]  Leonard, M. and Kennatt, B.L. (2008) Multicomponent Autoregressive Techniques for the Analysis of Seismograms. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 113.
[5]  Oskooi, B., Julayusefi, M. and Goudarzi, A. (2015) GPR Noise Reduction Based on Wavelet Thresholdings. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2937-2951.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1339-5
[6]  Kim, J.H. and Cho, S.J. (2007) Removal of Rining Noise in GPR Data by Signal Processing. Geosciences Journal, 11, 75-81.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910382
[7]  Canales, L.L. (1984) Random Noise Reduction. 54th Ann. Mtg. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 3.
https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1894168
[8]  Yilmaz, O. (2000) Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data. Soc. Explor. Geophys, 2000, 1, 7. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1-7.
[9]  Hashemi Amroabadi, M. (2010) Data Denoising in Analog & Digital Domain. A Thesis Present to Ryerson Univ., 11.
[10]  Harrison, M.P. (n.d.) f-x Linear Prediction Filtering of Seismic Images. 147-165.
[11]  Luetkepohl, H. (2011) Vector Autoregressive Models, Economics Departments, In-stitutes and Research Centers in the World. Retrieved from IDEAS.
https://ideas.repec.org/p/eui/euiwps/eco2011-30.html
[12]  Fuss, R. (2007) Vector Autoregressive Models. Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg.
[13]  Naghizadeh, M. and Sacchi, M. (2012) Multicomponent f-x Seismic Random Noise Attenuation via Vector Autoregressive Operators. Geophysics, 99, 15.
https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0198.1
[14]  Wang, Y. (2015) Frequencies of the Ricker Wavelet. Geophysics, 80, A31-A37.
https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0441.1

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133