We propose the basis for a rigorous approach to modeling combat, specifically under conditions of complexity and uncertainty. The proposed basis is a tensorial generalization of earlier Lanchester-type equations, inspired by the contemporary debate in defence and military circles around how to best utilize information and communications systems in military operations, including the distributed C4ISR system (Command, Control, Communications, Computing, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance). Despite attracting considerable interest and spawning several efforts to develop sound theoretical frameworks for informing force design decision-making, the development of good frameworks for analytically modeling combat remains anything but decided. Using a simple combat scenario, we first develop a tensor generalization of the Lanchester square law, and then extend it to also include the Lanchester linear law, which represents the effect of suppressive fire. We also add on-off control inputs, and discuss the results of a simple simulation of the final model using our small scenario.
References
[1]
Jomini, A.H. (2007) Baron de: The Art of War (Dover Edition). Dover Publications, New York. (First Published in 1862)
[2]
Mahan, A.T. (2003) The Influence of Sea Power upon History: 1660-1783. Pelican Pub. Co., Gretna. (Original Publication 1890)
[3]
Fuller, J.F.C. (1926) The Foundations of the Science of War. Hutchinson and Company, London. https://archive.org/details/foundationsofsci00jfcf
[4]
Fuller, J.F.C. (1942) Machine Warfare: An Enquiry into the Influence of Mechanics on the Art of War. Hutchinson, London.
[5]
Hart, B.H. (1967) Liddell: Strategy. 2nd Revised Edition, Fredrick A. Praeger Publishers, New York.
[6]
Alberts, D., Garstka, J. and Stein, F. (1999) Network Centric Warfare: Developing and Leveraging Information Superiority. CCRP.
[7]
Davis, P.K. (2002) Effects-Based Operations: A Grand Challenge for the Analytical Community. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Arlington, and Pittsburgh.
[8]
von Clausewitz, C. (1989) In: Howard, M. and Paret, P., Eds., On War, Princeton University Press.
[9]
Rittel, H. and Webber, M. (1973) Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 155-169. (Reprinted in Cross, N., Ed. (1984) Developments in Design Methodology, Wiley and Sons, Chirchester.)
[10]
Reid, D.J., Goodman, G., Johnson, W. and Giffin, R.E. (2005) All That Glisters: Is Network-Centric Warfare Really Scientific? Defense and Security Analysis, 21, 335-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475179052000345403
[11]
Reid, D.J. (2017) An Autonomy Interrogative. In: Abbass, H.A., Scholz, J. and Reid, D.J., Eds., Foundations of Trusted Autonomy, Springer, New York, 365-391.
[12]
Hui, P.P. (2011) OPAL—A Survivability-Oriented Approach to Management of Tactical Military Networks. IEEE Military Communications Conference.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2011.6127450
[13]
Popper, K. (2014) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Routledge, New York (First Published in 1963).
[14]
Miller, D. (1998) Critical Rationalism: a Restatement and Defence. Open Court.
[15]
Lanchester, F.W. (1916) Aircraft in Warfare: The Dawn of the Fourth Arm. Constable, London.
[16]
Lanchester, F.W. (2000) Mathematics in Warfare. In: Newman, J., Ed., The World of Mathematics, Vol. 4, Simon and Schuster, New York, 2138-2157.
[17]
Osipov, M. (1995) The Influence of the Numerical Strength of Engaged Forces on Their Casualties. In: Helmbold, R.L. and Rehm, A.S., Trans., Warfare Modeling, Military Operations Research Society, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 290-343.
[18]
Chase, J.V. (1902) Sea Fights: A Mathematical Investigation of the Effect of Superiority of Force in Combats upon the Sea. Naval War College Archives, RG 8, Box 109, XTAV.
[19]
Fiske, B.A. (1905) American Naval Policy. U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings.
[20]
Baudry, A. (1912) La Bataille navale: Etudes sur les facteurs tactiques [The Naval Battle: Studies of the Tactical Factors]. Translated by C. F. Atkinson, Hugh Rees, London.
[21]
Peterson, R. (1967) On the Logarithmic Law of Combat and Its Application to Tank Combat. Operations Research, 15, 557-558. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.15.3.557
[22]
Bracken, J. (1995) Lanchester Models of the Ardennes Campaign. Naval Research Logistics, 42, 559-577.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199506)42:4<559::AID-NAV3220420405>3.0.CO;2-R
[23]
Keane, T. (2011) Combat Modelling with Partial Differential Equations. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35, 2723-2735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.11.057
[24]
McLemore, C., Gaver, D. and Jacobs, P. (2016) A Model for Geographically Distributed Combat Interactions of Swarming Naval and Air Forces. Naval Research Logistics, 63, 562-576. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21720
[25]
Ivancevic, V., Reid, D. and Pourbeik, P. (to appear) Tensor-Centric Warfare II: Entropic Uncertainty Modeling. ICA.
[26]
Wikipedia (2017) Battlespace.
[27]
Penrose, R. (2004) The Road to Reality. Jonathan Cape, London.
[28]
Ivancevic, V. and Ivancevic, T. (2006) Geometrical Dynamics of Complex Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4545-X
[29]
Ivancevic, V. and Ivancevic, T. (2007) Applied Differential Geometry: A Modern Introduction. World Scientific, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1142/6420
[30]
Ivancevic, V. and Ivancevic, T. (2008) Complex Nonlinearity: Chaos, Phase Transitions, Topology Change and Path Integrals. Springer, Berlin.
[31]
Ivancevic, V. and Reid, D. (2015) Complexity and Control: Towards a Rigorous Behavioral Theory of Complex Dynamical Systems. World Scientific, Singapore.
[32]
Ivancevic, V., Reid, D. and Pilling, M. (2017) Mathematics of Autonomy: Mathematical Methods for Cyber-Physical-Cognitive Systems. World Scientific, New Jersey/Singapore.
[33]
Ivancevic, V. and Ivancevic, T. (2007) Neuro-Fuzzy Associative Machinery for Comprehensive Brain and Cognition Modelling. Springer, Berlin.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48396-0
[34]
xTensor (2015) Fast Abstract Tensor Computer Algebra. http://xact.es/xTensor/
[35]
EurekAlert! (12 June 2017) Blue Brain Team Discovers a Multi-Dimensional Universe in Brain Networks.
[36]
Reimann, M., et al. (2017) Cliques of Neurons Bound into Cavities Provide a Missing Link between Structure and Function. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 11, 48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2017.00048
[37]
Bassett, D. and Sporns, O. (2017) Network Neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 20, 353-364. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4502
[38]
Bauer, U., Kerber, M., Reininghaus, J. and Wagner, H. (2017) PHAT—Persistent Homology Algorithms Toolbox. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 78, 76-90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsc.2016.03.008
