全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Comparison of GPR Random Noise Attenuation Using Autoregressive-FX Method and Tunable Quality Factor Wavelet Transform TQWT with Soft and Hard Thresholding

DOI: 10.4236/jsip.2019.101003, PP. 19-35

Keywords: GPR, Autoregressive-FX, Tunable Quality Factor Wavelet Transform TQWT

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Ground Penetration Radar is a controlled source geophysical method which uses high frequency electromagnetic waves to study shallow layers. Resolution of this method depends on difference of electrical properties between target and surrounding electrical medium, target geometry and used bandwidth. The wavelet transform is used extensively in signal analysis and noise attenuation. In addition, wavelet domain allows local precise descriptions of signal behavior. The Fourier coefficient represents a component for all time and therefore local events must be described by the phase characteristic which can be abolished or strengthened over a large period of time. Finally basis of Auto Regression (AR) is the fitting of an appropriate model on data, which in practice results in more information from data process. Estimation of the parameters of the regression model (AR) is very important. In order to obtain a higher-resolution spectral estimation than other models, recursive operator is a suitable tool. Generally, it is much easier to work with an Auto Regression model. Results shows that the TQWT in soft thresholding mode can attenuate random noise far better than TQWT in hard thresholding mode and Autoregressive-FX method.

References

[1]  Annan, A.P. (2001) Ground Penetrating Radar. Workshop Notes, September 2001, 192.
[2]  Daniels, D.J. (2004) Ground Penetrating Radar. 734.
https://doi.org/10.1049/PBRA015E
[3]  Burrus, S.C. and Gopinath, R.A. (2013) Wavelets and Wavelet Transforms. Rice University, Houston, 1-281.
[4]  Kim, J.H. and Cho, S.J. (2007) Removal of Rining Noise in GPR Data by Signal Processing. Geosciences Journal, 11, 75-81.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910382
[5]  Leonard, M. and Kennatt, B.L.N. (2008) Multicomponent Autoregressive Techniques for the Analysis of Seismograms. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 113.
[6]  Oskooi, B., Julayusefi, M. and Goudarzi, A. (2015) GPR Noise Reduction Based on Wavelet Thresholdings. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2937-2951.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1339-5
[7]  Selesnick, I.W. (2011) Sparse Signal Representations Using the Tunable Q-Factor Wavelet Transform. Proc. SPIE 8138, Wavelets and Sparsity XIV, 81381U.
[8]  Yilmaz, O. (2000) Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1-7.
[9]  Canales, L.L. (1984) Random Noise Reduction. 54th Ann. Mtg. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1894168
[10]  Hashemi Amroabadi, M. (2010) Data Denoising in Analog & Digital Domain. A Thesis Present to Ryerson University.
[11]  Harrison, M.P. f-x Linear Prediction Filtering of Seismic Images.
[12]  Luetkepohl, H. (2011) Vector Autoregressive Models, Economics Departments, Institutes and Research Centers in the World.
https://ideas.repec.org/p/eui/euiwps/eco2011-30.html
[13]  Fuss, R. (2007) Vector Autoregressive Models. Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg.
[14]  Naghizadeh, M. and Sacchi, M. (2012) Multicomponent f-x Seismic Random Noise Attenuation via Vector Autoregressive Operators. Geophysics, 77, V91-V99.
[15]  Wang, Y. (2015) Frequencies of the Ricker Wavelet. Geophysics, A31-A37.
https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0441.1

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413