全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2018 

基于因果分析的群体行为识别
Group Activity Recognition in Crowd via Causality Analysis

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0548.2018.02.015

Keywords: 因果分析,主集,群体行为识别,群体检测,稀疏表示

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

该文提出一种基于因果分析的群体行为识别方法,利用Grange因果检验分析个体行为间的因果关系,在此基础上,结合个体间的因果关系、空间位置关系和视觉注意力范围,利用基于主集的聚类法检测行为群体。为了有效地表示群体行为,用方向梯度直方图和光流直方图描述个体行为,用因果特征描述个体间的交互行为。采用稀疏表示进行群体行为识别,在公共数据库BEHAVE和collective activity上对该方法进行验证,并与其他方法进行对比试验,结果表明了该方法的有效性。

References

[1]  NI B, YAN S, KASSIM A. Recognizing human group activities with localized causalities[C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Miam:IEEE, 2009:1470-1477.
[2]  CHENG Z, QIN L, HUANG Q. Group activity recognition by gaussian processes estimation[C]//IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Istanbul:IEEE, 2010.
[3]  BULO S R, BOMZE I M. Infection and immunization:a new class of evolutionary game dynamics[J]. GAMES and Economic Behavior, 2011, 71(1):193-211.
[4]  MILAN A, SCHINDLER K, ROTH S. Multi-target tracking by discrete-continuous energy minimization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2016, 38(10):2054-2068.
[5]  ZHANG Y S, GUO Y. 2D OMP algorithm for space-time parameters estimation of moving targets[J]. Electronics Letters, 2015, 51(22):1809-1820.
[6]  MUKHERJEE S, BASU R, SEELAMANTULA C S. 1-K-SVD:a robust dictionary learning algorithm with simultaneous update[J]. Signal Processing, 2016, 123:42-52.
[7]  KANEKO T, SHIMOSAKA M, ODASHIMA S. A fully connected model for consistent collective activity recognition in videos[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2014, 43(1):109-118.
[8]  AMER M R, TODOROVIC S. A chains model for localizing participantsof group activities in videos[C]//IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Barcelona:IEEE, 2011:786-793.
[9]  ZHU G, YAN S, HAN T, et al. Generative group activity analysis with quaternion descriptor[J]. Adv Multimed Model, 2011, 6524:1-11.
[10]  ZHOU Y, HUANG T S, NI B, et al. Recognizing pair-activities by causality analysis[J]. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2011, 2(5):1-20.
[11]  YIN Y, YANG G, XU J. Small group human activity recognition[C]//IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Lake Buena Vista:IEEE, 2012:2709-2712.
[12]  JU J, YANG C, SCHERER S. Recognition of human group activity for video analytics[C]//Pacific-Rim Conference on Multimedia. Gwangju:IEEE, 2015.
[13]  KIM Y J, CHO N G, LEE S W. Group activity recognition with group interaction zone[C]//International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Stockholm:IEEE, 2014:3517-3521.
[14]  STEPHENS K, BORS A G. Group activity recognition on outdoor scenes[C]//IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance. Colorado Springs:IEEE, 2016:59-65.
[15]  ZHANG C, YANG X, LIN W, et al. Recognizing human group behaviors with multi-group causalities[C]//International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology Workshops. Macau:IEEE, 2012:44-48.
[16]  CHO N G, KIM Y J, PARK U. Group activity recognition with group interaction zone based on relative distance between human objects[J]. International Journal Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence,2015, 29(5):1-10.
[17]  TRAN K N, YAN Xu, KAKADIARIS I A, et al. A hybrid approach for individual and group activity analysis in crowded scene[J]. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2016, 598:189-204.
[18]  GRANGER C. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods[J]. Econometrica, 1969, 37(3):424-438.
[19]  PAVAN M, PELILLO M. Dominant sets and pairwise clustering[J]. IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 2007, 29(1):167-172.

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133