全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Tensor-Centric Warfare V: Topology of Systems Confrontation

DOI: 10.4236/ica.2019.101002, PP. 13-45

Keywords: Tensor-Centric Warfare, Systems Confrontation, Systems-Battlespace Topology, Cobordisms and Morse Functions, Morse-Smale Homology, Morse-Witten Cohomology, Hodge-De Rham Theory

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In this paper, as a new contribution to the tensor-centric warfare (TCW) series [1] [2] [3] [4], we extend the kinetic TCW-framework to include non-kinetic effects, by addressing a general systems confrontation [5], which is waged not only in the traditional physical Air-Land-Sea domains, but also simultaneously across multiple non-physical domains, including cyberspace and social networks. Upon this basis, this paper attempts to address a more general analytical scenario using rigorous topological methods to introduce a two-level topological representation of modern armed conflict; in doing so, it extends from the traditional red-blue model of conflict to a red-blue-green model, where green represents various neutral elements as active factions; indeed, green can effectively decide the outcomes from red-blue conflict. System confrontations at various stages of the scenario will be defined by the non-equilibrium phase transitions which are superficially characterized by sudden entropy growth. These will be shown to have the underlying topology changes of the systems-battlespace. The two-level topological analysis of the systems-battlespace is utilized to address the question of topology changes in the combined battlespace. Once an intuitive analysis of the combined battlespace topology is performed, a rigorous topological analysis follows using (co)homological invariants of the combined systems-battlespace manifold.

References

[1]  Ivancevic, V., Pourbeik, P. and Reid, D. (2018) Tensor-Centric Warfare I: Tensor Lanchester Equations. Intelligent Control and Automation, 9, 11-29.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ica.2018.92002
[2]  Ivancevic, V., Reid, D. and Pourbeik, P. (2018) Tensor-Centric Warfare II: Entropic Uncertainty Modeling. Intelligent Control and Automation, 9, 30-51.
[3]  Ivancevic, V., Pourbeik, P. and Reid, D. (2018) Tensor-Centric Warfare III: Combat Dynamics with Delta-Strikes. Intelligent Control and Automation, 9, 107-122.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ica.2018.94009
[4]  Ivancevic, V., Reid, D. and Pourbeik, P. (2018) Tensor-Centric Warfare IV: Kähler Dynamics of Battlefields. Intelligent Control and Automation, 9, 123-146.
[5]  Engstrom, J. (2018) Systems Confrontation and System Destruction Warfare: How the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Seeks to Wage Modern Warfare. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1708
[6]  Cormier, Y. (2016) War as Paradox: Clausewitz and Hegel on Fighting Doctrines and Ethics. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal.
[7]  Ivancevic, V. and Ivancevic, T. (2006) Geometrical Dynamics of Complex Systems. Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4545-X
[8]  Ivancevic, V. and Ivancevic, T. (2007) Applied Differential Geometry: A Modern Introduction. World Scientific, Singapore.
https://doi.org/10.1142/6420
[9]  Bauer, U., Kerber, M., Reininghaus, J. and Wagner, H. (2017) PHAT—Persistent Homology Algorithms Toolbox. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 78, 76-90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsc.2016.03.008
[10]  Reimann, M. et al. (2017) Cliques of Neurons Bound into Cavities Provide a Missing Link between Structure and Function. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 11, 4.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2017.00048
[11]  Bassett, D. and Sporns, O. (2017) Network Neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 20, 353-364.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4502
[12]  McLemore, C., Gaver, D. and Jacobs, P. (2016) Model for Geographically Distributed Combat Interactions of Swarming Naval and Air Forces. Naval Research Logistics, 63, 562-576.
https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21720
[13]  Ivancevic, V. and Ivancevic, T. (2008) Complex Nonlinearity: Chaos, Phase Transitions, Topology Change and Path Integrals. Springer.
[14]  Reid, D.J. (2018) An Autonomy Interrogative. In: Abbass, H., Scholz, J. and Reid, D.J., Eds., Foundations of Trusted Autonomy, Springer, 365-391.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64816-3_21
[15]  Milnor, J. (1963) Morse Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[16]  Milnor, J. (1965) Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint. The University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.
[17]  Milnor, J. (1965) Lectures on the H-Cobordism Theorem. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400878055
[18]  Milnor, J. (1962) A Survey of Cobordism Theory. L’Enseignement mathématique, 8, 16.
[19]  Dowker, H.F. and Garcia, R.S. (1998) A Handlebody Calculus for Topology Change. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 15, 1859-1879.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/15/7/005
[20]  Schwarz, M. (1993) Morse Homology. Birkháuser, Basel.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8577-5
[21]  Poincaré, H. (1895) Analysis Situs. Journal d’Ecole Polytechnique Normale, 1, 1-121.
[22]  Smale, S. (1960) The Generalized Poincaré Conjecture in Higher Dimensions. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 66, 373-375.
https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1960-10458-2
[23]  Smale, S. (1967) Differentiable Dynamical Systems. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 73, 747-817.
https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1967-11798-1
[24]  Witten, E. (1982) Supersymmetry and Morse Theory. Journal of Differential Geometry, 17, 661-692.
https://doi.org/10.4310/jdg/1214437492
[25]  Bott, R. (1988) Morse Theory Indomitable. Publications mathématiques de l’IHéS, 68, 99-114.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02698544
[26]  Chen, Y. (2018) A Brief History of Morse Homology.
[27]  Shub, M. (2007) Morse-Smale Systems. Scholarpedia, 2, 1785.
https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.1785
[28]  Milinković, D. (1999) Morse Homology for Generating Functions of Lagrangian Submanifolds. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 351, 3953-3974.
https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-99-02217-5
[29]  Bott, R. and Tu, L.W. (1982) Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology. Springer, New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3951-0
[30]  Choquet-Bruhat, Y. and DeWitt-Morete, C. (1982) Analysis, Manifolds and Physics. 2nd Edition, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
[31]  Marsden, J.E. and Tromba, A. (2003) Vector Calculus. 5th Edition, W. Freeman and Company, New York.
[32]  de Rham, G. (1984) Differentiable Manifolds. Springer, Berlin.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61752-2
[33]  Flanders, H. (1963) Differential Forms: With Applications to the Physical Sciences. Academic Press, Cambridge.
[34]  Misner, C.W., Thorne, K.S. and Wheeler, J.A. (1973) Gravitation. Freeman, San Francisco.
[35]  Ciufolini, I. and Wheeler, J.A. (1995) Gravitation and Inertia, Princeton Series in Physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[36]  Switzer, R.K. (1975) Algebraic Topology—Homology and Homotopy (in Classics in Mathematics). Springer, New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61923-6
[37]  Hatcher, A. (2002) Algebraic Topology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[38]  Abraham, R., Marsden, J. and Ratiu, T. (1988) Manifolds, Tensor Analysis and Applications. Springer, New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1029-0
[39]  Wise, D.K. (2006) p-Form Electrodynamics on Discrete Spacetimes. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23, 5129-5176.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/23/17/004
[40]  Voisin, C. (2002) Hodge Theory and Complex Algebraic Geometry I. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615344
[41]  Ivancevic, V. and Ivancevic, T. (2008) Quantum Leap: From Dirac and Feynman, across the Universe, to Human Body and Mind. World Scientific, Singapore.
https://doi.org/10.1142/6913

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413