The growing update of computer and global technology provides the raw energy for college English teaching to start a revolution and development. How to deal with the teaching methods by using computer network to build a pluralistic system of interactive teaching for college English curriculum is a serious problem. This paper combines the characteristics of college English teaching, exploring the teaching ways of teaching mode and multi-interaction network of college English. Besides, it also reviews the evidence which is based on independent learning theory and several learning models, analyses the relationship between the advantages of computer network teaching and learning ability of students and enhances the benefits between teaching in practice and computer networks teaching. According to the research and survey of the College English Teaching Model of a University, it validated the role in promoting new teaching model to improve students’ self-learning ability.
References
[1]
Bardvi-Harlig, K. (2000) Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning, and Use. Language Leaning: A Journal of Research in Language Studies, 50, 1-5.
[2]
Gardner, R.C. and Lambert, W.E. (1959) Motivation Variables in Second Language Acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266-269.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083787
[3]
O’Malley, J.M. and Chamot, A.U. (1990) Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 56-59.
[4]
Olinger, H.C. (1939) Methodology in Language Teaching. The French Review, 12, 323-348.
[5]
Bpéen, M.P. and Candling, C.N. (1980) The Essentials of a Communicative Curriculum in Language Teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 89-112.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.2.89
[6]
Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Reppen, R. (1994) Corpus-Based Approaches to Issues in Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 15, 169-189.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.2.169
[7]
Jonassen, D.H. (2002) Engaging and Supporting Problem Solving in Online learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3, 9-12.
[8]
Stubbs, M. (2001) Texts, Corpora, and Problems of Interpretation: A Response to Widdowson. Applied linguistics, 22, 149-172.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.149
[9]
Chambers, A.T. and Bax, S. (2006) Making CALL Work: Towards Normalization. System, 8, 22-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.08.001
