This study presents field data and results on local fish processing, its energy supply, and consumption in the Northern Province of Zambia. The study also evaluates the impact of processing conditions on fish quality and cost for the different processing systems available in the selected communities. The result shows that fuelwood is the primary source of energy for fish processing used either in a modified three-stone fire (MTSF) system or a recently developed kiln. The charcoal smoking alternative had the least fuel consumption, yet was not considered as the preferred option due to the high cost of the fuel, a smaller quantity of fish processed per batch and longer processing time. The result also revealed that irrespective of the system used, the type of fish being processed and the pre-smoking drying time had a significant impact on the total energy consumption. Overall, the smoking kiln was found to increase the quantity of fish processed by five folds, reduce fuel use by 48% and reduce the overall smoking time per kilogram fish processed by 39%. A relatively higher fish quality was obtained with the use of the smoking kiln in comparison with the MTSF and the charcoal smoking system. The use of the smoking kiln as a fish processing system is recommended because it improves the quality of the fish, can scale up fish processing due to its capacity and reduces energy use with its associated costs.
References
[1]
FAO (2006) Zambia Fishery Country Profile. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Roma.
[2]
Desai, M.A., Mehta, S. and Smith, K.R. (2004) Indoor Smoke from Solid Fuels: Assessing the Environmental Burden of Disease at National and Local Levels. WHO Environmental Burden of Disease Series No. 4, World Health Organization, Geneva.
[3]
Johnson, N.G. (2005) Risk Analysis and Safety Evaluation of Household Stoves in Developing Nations.
[4]
Wickramasinghe, A. (2003) Gender and Health Issues in the Biomass Energy Cycle: Impediments to Sustainable Development. Energy for Sustainable Development, 7, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60365-8
[5]
Ramanathan, V. and Carmichael, G. (2008) Global and Regional Climate Changes Due to Black Carbon. Nature Geoscience, 1, 221-227.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo156
[6]
Lim, J.S., Abdul Manan, Z., Wan Alwi, S.R. and Hashim, H. (2012) A Review on Utilization of Biomass from Rice Industry as a Source of Renewable Energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 3084-3094.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.051
[7]
CSO (2010) Census of Population and Housing. National Descriptive Tables, Vol. 11, Central Statistics Office, Lusaka.
[8]
Bhattacharya, S.C., Albina, D.O. and Abdul Salam, P. (2002) Emission Factors of Wood and Charcoal-Fired Cookstoves. Biomass and Bioenergy, 23, 453-469.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00072-7
[9]
Bond, T. and Sun, H. (2005) Can Reducing Black Carbon Emissions Counteract Global Warming? Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 5921-5926.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0480421
[10]
Adamu, I.G., Kabri, H.U., Hussaini, I.D. and Mada, A.D. (2013) Design and Construction of Smoking Kiln. Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 5, 15-20. https://doi.org/10.5897/JETR12.042
[11]
ASTM (2010) Standard E1131-08. In: Test Method for Compositional Analysis by Thermogravimetry, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, 17.
[12]
Nhuchhen, D.R. and Abdul Salam, P. (2012) Estimation of Higher Heating Value of Biomass from the Proximate Analysis: A New Approach. Fuel, 99, 55-63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.04.015
[13]
WHO (2014) Household Air Pollution and Health. World Health Organization, Geneva.
[14]
Bruce, N., Perez-Padilla, R. and Albalak, R. (2000) Indoor Air Pollution in Developing Countries: A Major Environmental and Public Health Challenge. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78, 1078-1092.
