全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Preliminary Study by Reservoir Simulation of Field Trial Polymer Injection in SBR Field Using Silica-Modified HPAM

DOI: 10.4236/ojogas.2020.51001, PP. 1-15

Keywords: Polyacrylamide, Silica, Polymer, Injection, EOR

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Polyacrylamide (PAM) is the most inorganic polymer type which is usually used in injection for enhanced oil recovery. Furthermore, hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) is a common polymer used in polymer injection, but it has the sensitivity towards salinity and temperature. Thus, the experiment modified PAM and HPAM with silica aims to improve the performance of polymer toward temperature and salinity. This experiment included polymer synthesis, polymer modification, rheological measurement of the product and reservoir modeling study. Some experiments were performed to assess the feasibility of the product. In the polymer injection simulation, the properties of a polymer are referred to as product properties. The best outcome is selected to be implemented in SBR field. Prior to do trial in the real SBR field, the study by simulation is needed. The simulation predicts the incremental oil recovery and helps to determine an optimum injection rate and the best injection well location. The SBR field temperature, the salinity and the oil viscosity were about 60?C, 10,000 ppm and 2.64 cp, respectively. From the viscosity measurement, it was concluded that HPAM-Si was qualified to become a displacing agent because it had the highest viscosity among other product which was about 9.8 cp. The simulator used in this study was black oil IMEX-CMG simulator. The three scenarios applied were the base case, water injection and polymer injection. The base case gained recovery about 15.26%, whereas the water injection with a rate of about 2000 bbl/day gained oil recovery about 21.33%. The best scenario is polymer injection, where the optimum polymer injection rate is about 2000 bbl/day and the highest recovery is approximately 30.73%.

References

[1]  Needham, R.B. and Doe, P.H. (1987) Polymer Flooding Review. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 39, 1503-1507.
https://doi.org/10.2118/17140-PA
[2]  Green, D.W. and Willhite, G.P. (1972) Enhanced Oil Recovery. Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, SPE of AIME, New York.
[3]  Van Pollen, H.K. (1980) Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil Recovery. PennWell Books, Tulsa.
[4]  Seright, R.S., Campbell, A.R., Mozley, P.S. and Han, P.H. (2010) Stability of Partially Hydrolized Polyacrylamides at Elevated Temperatures in the Absence of Divalent Cations. SPE Journal, 15, 341-348.
https://doi.org/10.2118/121460-MS
[5]  Manichand, R.N., Moe Soe Let, K.P., Gil, L., Quillien, B. and Seright, R.S. (2013) Effective Propagation of HPAM Solutions through the Tambaredjo Field during a Polymer Flood. Society of Petroleum Engineers, London.
https://doi.org/10.2118/164121-MS
[6]  Jung, J.C., Zhang, K., Chon, B.H. and Choi, H.J. (2013) Rheology and Polymer Flooding Characteristics of Partially Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide for Enhanced Heavy Oil Recovery. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 127, 4833-4839.
https://doi.org/10.1002/app.38070
[7]  Hu, Z.L., et al. (2017) Rheological Properties of Partially Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide Seeded by Nanoparticles. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 56, 3456-3463.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b05036
[8]  Sharma, et al. (2011) A Practical Method to Calculate Polymer Viscosity Accurately in Numerical Reservoir Simulator. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 30 October-2 November 2011, 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.2118/147239-MS
[9]  Luftenegger, M., Kadnar, R., Puls, C. and Clemens, T. (2016) Operational Challenges and Monitoring of a Polymer Pilot, Matzen Field, Austria. PE Production and Operation.
https://doi.org/10.2118/174350-MS
[10]  Al-Shaky, B., Shiran, B.S. and Skauge, T. (2018) Enhanced Oil Recovery by Polymer Flooding: Optimizing Polymer Injectivity. SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Dammam, 23-26 April 2018, 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.2118/192437-MS
[11]  De Simoni, M., et al. (2018) Polymer Injectivity Analysis and Subsurface Polymer Behavior Evaluation. SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat, 25-28 March 2018, 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.2118/190383-MS
[12]  Henry, C.B. (1977) Modern Reservoir Engineering—A Simulation Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
[13]  Saleh, L.D., Wei, M. and Bai, B. (2014) Data Analysis and Updated Screening Criteria for Polymer Flooding Based on Oilfield Data. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 17, 15-25.
https://doi.org/10.2118/168220-PA

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413