The secondary flow downstream of a triple elbow layout was studied experimentally and numerically to visualize the flow behavior under swirling inlet flow conditions. The inlet swirling condition was generated by a swirl generator, consisting of a rotary pipe and honeycomb assembly. The experiments were carried out in turbulent water flow condition at Reynolds number Re = 1 × 104 and inlet swirl intensity S = 1. Ultrasonic measurements were taken at four locations downstream of the third elbow. The two-dimensional velocity field of the flow field was measured using the phased array ultrasonic velocity profiler technique to evaluate the flow field with separation. Furthermore, a numerical simulation was performed and its results were compared with the experimental data. The numerical result was obtained by solving three-dimensional, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations with the renormalization group k-ε turbulence model. The experimental results confirmed that the swirling flow condition modified the size of the separation region downstream of the third elbow. A qualitative comparison between the experimental and CFD simulation results of the averaged velocity field downstream of the third elbow showed similar tendency on reverse flow.
References
[1]
Ono, A., Kimura, N., Kamide, H. and Tobita, A. (2011) Influence of Elbow Curvature on Flow Structure at Elbow Outlet under High Reynolds Number Condition. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 241, 4409-4419.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.09.026
[2]
Yuki, K., Hasegawa, S., Sato, T., Hashizume, H., Aizawa, K. and Yamano, H. (2011) Matched Refractive-Index PIV Visualization of Complex Flow Structure in a Three Dimensionally Connected Dual Elbow. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 241, 4544-4550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.12.026
[3]
Kim, J., Yadav, M. and Kim, S. (2014) Characteristics of Secondary Flow Induced by 90-Degree Elbow in Turbulent Pipe Flow. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 8, 229-239.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2014.11015509
[4]
Mizutani, J., Ebara, S. and Hashizume, H. (2016) Evaluation of the Influence of the Inlet Swirling Flow on the Flow Field in a Triple Elbow System. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41, 7233-7238.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.040
[5]
NISA (2005) Secondary Piping Rupture Accident at Mihama Power Station, Unit 3, of the Kansai Electric Power Co. Inc. (Final Report).
http://www.atomdb.jnes.go.jp/content/000025568.pdf
[6]
Fujisawa, N., Yamagata, T., Kanno, S., Ito, A. and Takano, T. (2012) The Mechanism of Asymmetric Pipe-Wall Thinning behind an Orifice by Combined Effect of Swirling Flow and Orifice Bias. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 252, 19-26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.07.001
[7]
Takano, T., Ikarashi, Y., Uchiyama, K., Yamagata, T. and Fujisawa, N. (2016) Influence of Swirling Flow on Mass and Momentum Transfer Downstream of a Pipe with Elbow and Orifice. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 92, 394-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.08.087
[8]
Ebara, S., Sato, T., Hashizume, H., Aizawa, K. and Yamano, H. (2010) PIV Measurement for Dual Elbow Flow Using 1/7-Scale Model of Cold-Leg Piping in a Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor. Proc. 7th International Conference on Flow Dynamics, Sendai, 1-3 November 2010, 108-109.
[9]
Ebara, S., Takamura, H., Hashizume, H. and Yamano, H. (2016) Characteristics of Flow Field and Pressure Fluctuation in Complex Turbulent Flow in the Third Elbow of a Triple Elbow Piping with Small Curvature Radius in Three-Dimensional Layout. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41, 7139-7145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.068
[10]
Vester, A.K., Örlü, R. and Alfredsson, P.H. (2016) Turbulent Flows in Curved Pipes: Recent Advances in Experiments and Simulations. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 68, Article ID: 050802. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034135
[11]
Al-Rafai, W.N., Tridimas, Y.D. and Woolley, N.H. (1990) A Study of Turbulent Flows in Pipe Bends. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 204, 399-408.
https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1990_204_120_02
[12]
Hilgenstock, A. and Ernst, R. (1996) Analysis of Installation Effects by Means of Computational Fluid Dynamics—CFD versus Experiments? Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 7, 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(97)88066-1
[13]
Kalpakli, A. and Örlü, R. (2013) Turbulent Pipe Flow Downstream a 90° Pipe Bend with and without Superimposed Swirl. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 41, 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2013.01.003
[14]
Chang, T.H. and Lee, H.S., (2003) An Experimental Study on Swirling Flow in a 90 Degree Circular Tube by Using Particle Image Velocimetry. Journal of Visualization, 6, 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03181741
[15]
Takeda, Y. (1986) Velocity Profile Measurement by Ultrasound Doppler Shift Method. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 7, 313-318.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-727X(86)90011-1
[16]
Takeda, Y. and Kikura, H. (2002) Flow Mapping of the Mercury Flow. Experiments in Fluids, 32, 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480100296
[17]
Fukumoto, T., Tsukada, K., Ihara, T., Tsuzuki, N. and Kikura, H. (2013) A Study of Phased Array Ultrasonic Velocity Profile Monitor for Flow Rate Measurement. Proc. 21st International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Chengdu, 29 July-2 August 2013, Paper No. ICONE21-16601, 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE21-16601
[18]
Örlü, R. (2009) Experimental Studies in Jet Flows and Zero Pressure-Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers. Doctoral Dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology KTH Mechanics, Stockholm.
[19]
A. F. U. Guide (2011) Release 14.0. ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg.
