The effect of transfixation pins on the biomechanical properties of angled acrylic connecting bars

With acrylic external-fixation frames for fracture repair the acrylic columns can be contoured to allow greater versatility in the placement of transfixation pins, thus minimizing damage to the surrounding soft tissue and making mandibular and transarticular fixation easier. However, contouring affects the stiffness and ultimate strength of the construct under axial compression. In this study, polymethylmethacrylate columns 21 mm in diameter angled at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, or 90° with clamps were constructed. For each angulation group, pins 3.2-mm long were placed in 6 columns, 2 pins at each end, 1.5 cm from each other, and 6 columns had no pins. Each column was allowed to polymerize for a minimum of 10 min, then was placed in a biomechanical-testing machine, the load cell at the bottom end of the column and the actuator on top, with a preload of 10 to 12 N to prevent slippage. The columns underwent axial loading at a rate of 8 mm/s until catastrophic failure occurred. Data on force and deformation were collected every 0.025 s. Both stiffness and ultimate strength of the column decreased significantly (P < 0.01), up to 77% and 70%, respectively, with each increase of angulation. The columns with pins were significantly less stiff (P < 0.05) than those without pins at angulations of 45° and 60°. However, the columns with pins did not show significant differences in ultimate strength from the columns without pins at any of the angulations. The point of failure was always at the angle of the column, demonstrating that in axial compression the weakest point is not the pin–acrylic interface when pins are eccentrically located within the column