Dedicated Poster Abstracts

Background/Purpose: Increasing numbers of residency candidates and complicated candidate dossiers makes the portfolio review, often completed by program directors, difficult for one individual. This study assessed candidates more objectively, identify the utility of various components of the dossier and assessing the inter-rater reliability within and between Faculty and Resident evaluators. This project was taken on to determine the feasibility and reliability of a more objective process for evaluation of CaRMS portfolios