Comparison of Amplitude Modulated Sounds and Pure Tones at the Tinnitus Frequency: Residual Tinnitus Suppression and Stimulus Evaluation

Recent studies have compared tinnitus suppression, or residual inhibition, between amplitude- and frequency-modulated (AM) sounds and noises or pure tones (PT). Results are indicative, yet inconclusive, of stronger tinnitus suppression of modulated sounds especially near the tinnitus frequency. Systematic comparison of AM sounds at the tinnitus frequency has not yet been studied in depth. The current study therefore aims at further advancing this line of research by contrasting tinnitus suppression profiles of AM and PT sounds at the matched tinnitus frequency (i.e., 10 and 40？Hz AM vs. PT). Participants with chronic, tonal tinnitus (n？=？29) underwent comprehensive psychometric, audiometric, tinnitus matching, and acoustic stimulation procedures. Stimuli were presented for 3 minutes in two loudness regimes (60？dB sensation level [SL], minimum masking level [MML] + 6？dB, control sound: SL ？6？dB) and amplitude modulated with 0, 10, or 40？Hz. Tinnitus loudness suppression was measured after the stimulation every 30 seconds. In addition, stimuli were rated regarding their valence and arousal. Results demonstrate only trends for better tinnitus suppression for the 10？Hz modulation and presentation level of 60？dB SL compared with PT, whereas nonsignificant results are reported for 40？Hz and MML + 6？dB, respectively. Furthermore, the 10？Hz AM at 60？dB SL and the 40？Hz AM at MML + 6？dB (trend) stimuli were better tolerated as elicited by valence ratings. We conclude that 10？Hz AM sounds at the tinnitus frequency may be useful to further elucidate the phenomenon of residual inhibition