Comparison of sandblasted, ground and melt-etched zirconia crowns regarding adhesion strength to resin cement

Abstract Objectives: The aim is to compare the adhesion between zirconia and cements attained with melt-etching with potassium hydrogen difluoride, KHF2, with that found when such traditional surface treatments as sandblasting and ceramic stone grinding are employed. Materials and methods: Groups of zirconia crowns where treated by sandblasting (n？=？6), grinding with carbide bur (n？=？6) or melt-etching with KHF2 (n？=？6) of the surface before cementation with a resin cement to an implant substitute made by Selective Laser Melting of a cobalt-chromium alloy. Tensile testing was performed to rupture, while measured increasing load at the zirconia-cement interface. The strength was calculated by dividing the rupture load with the contact area. The three groups were compared using one-way ANOVA. Results: The adhesion strength between the zirconia crowns and the cement resulted in significant differences between all groups (p？<？.05). The sandblasted group had the lowest strength (5.2？±？0.95？MPa), the ground group significantly higher (7.3？±？1.49？MPa) and the melt-etched group the highest values (9.8？±？1.37？MPa). Conclusion: The adhesive strength of resin cement to zirconia can be ranked according to the surface preparation with surfaces melt-etched with KHF2 stronger than ground which is stronger than sandblasted