全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2020 

搭接长度和铺层方式对CFRP复合材料层合板胶接结构连接性能和损伤行为的影响
Effect of lap length and stacking sequence on strength and damage behaviors of adhesively bonded CFRP composite laminates

DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20190308.001

Keywords: CFRP,复合材料,层合板,胶接结构,搭接长度,铺层方式,连接强度
CFRP
,composite,laminates,adhesively bonded structure,lap length,stacking sequence,bonding strength

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

针对不同搭接长度和铺层方式的碳纤维增强树脂(CFRP)复合材料层合板单搭胶接结构进行了拉伸试验,观察了试件的受力过程和失效形态,获得了载荷-位移曲线;同时基于连续损伤力学模型和三维Hashin失效准则模拟了CFRP复合材料层合板的层内损伤形成和演化,并利用内聚力模型来模拟层间及胶层的失效损伤,对CFRP复合材料层合板单搭胶接结构在拉伸作用下的失效强度和损伤机制进行了预测,通过对比验证了该数值方法的有效性;通过数值试验比较不同搭接长度和铺层方式的单搭胶接结构及双搭胶接结构的连接强度和损伤行为,并提出了一种优化的CFRP复合材料层合板胶接结构。结果表明:CFRP复合材料层合板胶接结构的极限失效载荷随着搭接长度的增大逐渐增加并趋于稳定值,且结构的失效形式逐渐从胶层自身剪切失效过渡到邻近胶层的层合板层间分层失效;CFRP复合材料层合板胶接结构的连接强度和损伤行为随着铺层方式的不同而改变,通过对3种铺层方式的对比和分析,得到性能最好的铺层方式是[03/903]2S;在搭接长度为5~20 mm时,通过对搭接长度进行优化,得到单搭胶接结构的最优搭接长度是17 mm,双搭胶接结构的最优搭接长度是19.3 mm,与搭接长度为20 mm相比,单搭胶接结构和双搭胶接结构的连接强度分别提高了13.26%和0.43%。 The experimental tensile tests have been performed on adhesively bonded single-lap joints of carbon fiber reinforced polymer(CFRP) composite laminates with different lap lengths and stacking sequences. The relevant mechanical responses and damage behaviors were observed during the test process. Finite element (FE) models were built, in which the intralaminar damage was captured using the continuum damage mechanics (CDM) theory derived from 3D Hashin damage criteria, and the delamination of CFRP composite laminates as well as the failure of adhesive were simulated by cohesive zone model (CZM). The numerical prediction is in a good agreement with the experimental results, which validates the numerical modeling strategy. The effect of lap length and stacking sequence on the bonding strength and damage behaviors was investigated for adhesively bonded joints with single-lap and double-lap configurations. The optimization configuration was obtained using the numerical simulation for adhesively bonded joint of CFRP composite laminates. The results show that the ultimate failure load rises with the increase of the lap length for both single-lap and double-lap configurations, and it finally tends to be a stable value. The failure modes of the joints gradually transform from the shear failure within adhesive film to the delamination within laminates adjacent to the ahesive film. The bonding strength and failure modes also change as the stacking sequence varies, and the optimal stacking sequence is obtained as[03/903]2 s by comparing and analysing three stacking sequences. When the lap length varies in the range of 5-20 mm, the optimum is obtained as 17 mm for single-lap configuration, and that value is 19.3 mm in the double-lap case. Compared with joint with the lap length of 20 mm, the bonding strengths of adhesively bonding single-lap and double-lap joints are increased by 13.26% and 0.43%, respectively. 国家自然科学基金民航联合基金重点项目(U1833116);国家博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2018M642775

References

[1]  李振凯, 余音, 汪海. 复合材料层合板双面贴补结构渐进损伤分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2014, 48(6):877-882.LI Z K, YU Y, WANG H. Progressive damage analysis of double-sided adhesively bonding repaired structures of composite laminates[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2014, 48(6):877-882(in Chinese).
[2]  苗学周, 李成, 铁瑛, 等. 补片形状和尺寸对复合材料胶接修补的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2014, 50(20):63-69.MIAO X Z, LI C, TIE Y, et al. Influence of patch shape and size on adhesively bonded composite repair[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 50(20):63-69(in Chinese).
[3]  LINDE P, PLEITNER J. Modelling and simulation of fibre metal laminates[C]//ABAQUS Users' Conference. Boston:[s.n.]. 2004:421-439.
[4]  GUO W, XUE P, YANG J. Nonlinear progressive damage model for composite laminates used for low velocity impact[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2013, 34(9):1145-1154.
[5]  许爱华, 李勇, 还大军, 等. Z-pin增强树脂基复合材料单搭接接头抗冲击性能[J]. 航空动力学报, 2018, 33(3):671-682.XU A H, LI Y, HUAN D J, et al. Impact resistance performances of resin matrix composite single lap joints reinforced by Z-pin[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(3):671-682(in Chinese).
[6]  ZHAO L B, WANG Y N, QIN T L, et al. A new material model for 2D FE analysis of adhesively bonded composite joints[J]. Materials Science, 2014, 20(4):468-473.
[7]  RIBEIRO T E A, CAMPILHO R D S G, DA-SILVA L F M, et al. Damage analysis of composite aluminium adhesively bonded single-lap joints[J]. Composite Structures, 2016, 13:25-33.
[8]  郭凯特, 谢宗蕻, 李想, 等. 复合材料双面贴补修理拉伸解析分析模型及试验验证[J]. 复合材料学报, 2017, 34(10):2194-2204.GUO K T, XIE Z H, LI X, et al. An analytical model and its validation for a composite double lap joints under unidirectional tension[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2017, 34(10):2194-2204(in Chinese).
[9]  吕胜利, 程起有, 姚磊江, 等. 损伤复合材料层板胶接修理的优化设计[J]. 机械强度, 2007, 29(4):598-600.LV S L, CHENG Q Y, YAO L J, et al. Optimization design of adhesive bonding repair of damaged composite laminates[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2007, 29(4):598-600(in Chinese).
[10]  郭霞, 关志东, 刘遂, 等. 搭接长度对复合材料单搭接胶接接头的影响[J]. 科技导报, 2013, 31(7):37-41.GUO X, GUAN Z D, LIU S, et al. Effect of lap length on the adhesive-bonded single-lap composite joints[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2013, 31(7):37-41(in Chinese).
[11]  SULU I Y. Mechanical behavior of single-lap and double-lap adhesive joined composite parts[J]. Mechanical Testing Numerical Simulation, 2017, 59:11-12.
[12]  王天宇, 段跃新, 向经纬, 等. 铺层顺序对预成型体搭接复合材料拉伸性能影响的仿真与验证[J]. 复合材料学报, 2018, 35(10):2745-2752.WANG T Y, DUAN Y X, XIANG J W, et al. Simulation analysis and verification of the effect of stacking sequence on tensile properties of preform laminated composites[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2018, 35(10):2745-2752(in Chinese).
[13]  SULU I Y. Mechanical behavior of composite parts adhesively jointed with the insert double-lap joint under tensile load[J]. Welding in the World, 2018, 62(2):403-413.
[14]  BUDHE S, BANEA M D, DE BARROS S, et al. An updated review of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2017, 72:30-42.
[15]  LI J F, YAN Y, ZHANG T T, et al. Experimental study of adhesively bonded CFRP joints subjected to tensile loads[J]. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 2015, 57:95-104.
[16]  孙振辉, 铁瑛, 侯玉亮, 等. 相对冲击位置和补片层数对胶接修理CFRP层合板抗冲击性能的影响[J]. 复合材料学报, 2019, 36(5):1114-1123.SUN Z H, TIE Y, HOU Y L, et al. Effect of relative impact location and patch layer number on impact resistance of adhesive repaired CFRP laminates[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2019, 36(5):1114-1123(in Chinese).
[17]  刘斌, 徐绯, 司源, 等. 飞机复合材料斜胶接修补结构的冲击损伤[J]. 复合材料学报, 2018, 35(10):2698-2705.LIU B, XU F, SI Y, et al. Impact damage of composite scarf bonded repair structure for aircraft[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2018, 35(10):2698-2705(in Chinese).
[18]  邓雅琼, 陈洋, 栗娜, 等. 三维编织复合材料与金属胶接结构的力学性能与优化[J]. 复合材料学报, 2018, 35(10):2760-2767.DENG Y Q, CHEN Y, LI N, et al. Mechanical properties and optimization adhesive structure of three-dimensional braided composites and metal[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2018, 35(10):2760-2767(in Chinese).
[19]  TIE Y, HOU Y L, LI C. An insight into the low-velocity impact behavior of patch-repaired CFRP laminates using the numerical and experimental approaches[J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 190:179-188.
[20]  YE J X, YAN Y, LI T, et al. 3D explicit finite element analysis of tensile failure behavior in adhesive-bonded composite single-lap joints[J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 201:261-275.
[21]  HOU Y L, TIE Y, LI C, et al. Low-velocity impact behaviors of repaired CFRP laminates:Effect of impact location and external patch configurations[J]. Composites Part B, 2019, 163:669-680.
[22]  刘魏光, 余音, 汪海. 考虑剪切非线性的复合材料渐进损伤模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2016, 50(2):194-199.LIU W G, YU Y, WANG H. A damage model considering shear nonlinearity for progressive failure analysis of composite laminates[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2016, 50(2):194-199(in Chinese).
[23]  梁祖典, 燕瑛, 张涛涛, 等. 复合材料单搭接胶接接头试验研究与数值模拟[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2014, 40(12):1786-1792.LIANG Z D, YAN Y, ZHANG T T, et al. Experimental investigation and numerical simulation of composite laminate adhesively bonded single-lap joints[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014, 40(12):1786-1792(in Chinese).
[24]  GUO X, GUAN Z D, NIE H C, et al. Damage tolerance analysis of adhesively bonded composite single lap joints containing a debond flaw[J]. The Journal of Adhesion, 2016, 93(3):216-234.
[25]  姚磊江, 童小燕, 吕胜利. 损伤复合材料层板胶接修理试验研究[J]. 机械强度, 2003, 25(3):260-263.YAO L J, TONG X Y, LV S L. Experimental study on the adhesive bonding repair of damaged composite lamiantes[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2003, 25(3):260-263(in Chinese).
[26]  CAMPILHO R D S G, BANEA M D, PINTO A M G, et al. Strength prediction of single-and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2011, 31(5):363-372.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413